My meager rationed coffee grew cold as I contemplated all the horrors that awaited me, old age the final insult, perhaps after blindness, perhaps my eyes would go dark after my mind, confusing whatever thought processes remained, the fate of all of us.
What a cold, grey morning outside. Those introductory paragraphs are part of the science of nostradamus which is now a pretty well developed outline of 39,000 words. It could masquerade as a novel on a kindle already, although it is not sufficiently polished to share.
On the other hand, Algorithm Universe Theory, Book 5, 2nd edition, is now available in print. If you bought the first edition and feel cheated, you can come by and I'll sign your first edition and give you a second. 1-4 need to be rewritten, book 5 is hardly written, but it has these key element that convince me I have an understanding laid out fairly well, many the product of the posts just written.
For those of you waiting for the "oral version," I apologize for not having dictated much, the needs of the flesh and all of that.
I thought last night as I lay awake about individual photons, not some phantasmagorical wave function, but ct2 quantum waves and how they must, due to linearity, explode during phase transitions, wondering if this is where their power above the non dimensional plane of super-symmetry might lie, could they recombine after such a tragic end and is there some mathematical requirement that they do so or not built into the sub-formula of supper-symmetry?
I started reading and was saddened by how much there was that is not yet in AuT, that may never be there.
I went back to some of the drawings that reflected how these things were held together that might prevent them from breaking apart and decided to put them together. This is all a reflection of quantum math, the actual drawings of a single ct2 quantum state is not outside of the artist's expertise, there is only so much information represented there in the shells, the four boxes below giving some hint to the interaction of a ct4 state, imagine how much easier a ct2 state would be to draw. Indeed, the drawing below it, the large one, not the tiny snowman, is not the worst of starts.
None of these drawings is intended to be "right." Each one represents some element of the mathematics that I wanted to picture for a better understanding of what was going on. There is too much dimension in them.
Even the drawing on the right which represents so much more than what it appears and which suggests so much that is not yet written and which appears, at least so far, only in the second edition of book 5, is merely a tool.
But tools are what I have. The equations I have also, but they appear so trivial, because compression occurs by accident, because the only compression I have been able to determine yet comes not from some dimensional element by form the order of the solutions and how those ordered solutions combine.
The triangle drawing, which is such a poor representation of anything, is not the worse of drawings. This order shifts in an outer layer, maintaining the inner layer and we live in the line of solutions at the very top, the amount of information increasing even as it breathes in and out through compression, an event that is reflected in the very breath that we breath, for so short a time.
If exchanges happen in a linear fashion, so then a "state" (+/-) transition during a carrier arm will disrupt the carrier on which the change occurs like an exploding rail-car in the middle of a long train speeding on a train track.
Perhaps the drawing below best explains why this does not always result in some terminal event, even rarely so. Remember that each ct2 is surrounded by a cloud of solutions, going to one, of ct1 so that at the ct2 level it is ct1-ct2-ct1-ct2 or nearly so.
We have this "mystery" of the 22 to 256 which might mean, in some fashion, that there are 22 intervening solutions of ct1 even though the substitution rate may be less or even more.
Note that we show the ct0 building which is the pre-space element but equally important because it shows the first pairing to get to a compressed state of fpluspix, the solution for which is that discussion of the strange triangle model above and to the right.
The two drawings above reflect the built in durability of ct2 states given the density and the bottom of the two shows how substitution is expected to occur within the carrier arm type solution. Carrier arms are likely the result of the linear form as well as "pairing" which is only a theoretical concept, but one which makes sense given our sense of logic, although how that is reflected in an equation without force is, itself, forced.
This drawing showing how states can be shared has to be looked at in light of all the activity and linearity of solution in all the prior drawings.
There is no predicted way for higher ct states to be put merely put on an adjoining track, but that is the effect of multiple place solutions that we see with the ct1 to ct2 transition. The reason we can have quantum moments is because the transitions and solution order aspects occur in a non-linear environment so that they can occur together even though they are adjacent and linear one to the next in that other environment.
In these pre-linear transitions you get minor train wrecks like this:
abab (plus/minus ct0)
baba (minus/plus ct0)
abab
baba
These four together in this order create ct0, but these have fpluspix transitions of each letter (a or b) although only one of these has irregular transitions at a time. Behind this, something goes -1,1 creating the "pairings" and back while this ct0 has fpluspix explosive changes which take the alignment out of the 4 states.
The first dimension which to some extent must allow the first side-train track is ct2 which is 256 double aligned (ct0, ct1) state.
While there are explosive changes in the middle, there is presumably some durability due to the amount of stacking and the possibility of interchanging states. Moreover, the constant transitions of ct1 within the ct2 and those without the ct2 give rise to the SOL transitions that we associate with light.
The more tracks, the higher the chance for sharing, although how this "fixes" trainwrecks in the middle is easier to envision with a 2nd dimension which may be required (ct3) to do that. You can see that we do not live very far into this compression cycle, yet we have so much internal velocity (high ct state exchange relative to lower ct state exchanges).
In looking over this and considering transitional states a number of thoughts come to mind and I began to get articles which I thought might be of some value in seeing how this is reflected in higher state adn it would be worthwhile to spend time reconciling these observations with AuT.
https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/Journal-of-Photonics-for-Energy/volume-5/issue-01/050997/The-role-of-photonics-in-energy/10.1117/1.JPE.5.050997.full?SSO=1
https://nanoscalereslett.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s11671-016-1357-1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasmon
http://nanoscale.blogspot.com/2009/02/what-is-plasmon.html
Did I mention that book 5 was ready? For those waiting for more audio, it is coming, I hope.
No comments:
Post a Comment