Our brains have huge amounts of processing power. There are a billion specialized cells working off electric currents, one of the manifestations of the alternating cycles of information.
Why would it be unusual for them to read the tides (incoming and outgoing) of history as it combines and breaks up to ascertain what is coming up if the patterns are there to begin with.
Yes, but if we can see them in advance, could we not change them?
You should go with me to get something to eat. Strange, you have the opportunity to take the person who has figured out how the universe works (and you know why) and yet you don't take the opportunity to take me out to eat.
I know, you cay "i cannot, i have to write down my notes.
the movement of history..."
This little piece is a bothersome piece about the movement of time. I need to do some math on this, the 27:256 type. I want to see if we could get to where we need to be using the method of averaging discussed in book 5 and set out in an earlier blog, although even then I don not believe that I went out even close to 27 places. That is what I have to do, but even then it is a very complex mathematical averaging, especially if the prior states remain in place. Anyway...
Velocity
only goes in one direction in that there is no “anti-velocity.” You can reduce velocity but you either move or you don't and AuT requires some movement,a change with each change in x, but relative changes can go in either direction, compression vs decompression.
High ct changes only move in one direction, only compression vs decompression change and this is a high ct result based on low ct variations.
As long a ct changes of any size only moves in one direction, time only moves in one direction. The compression vs decompression allows entropy can go in either direction, but that doesn't change ct substitution.
Ct1 exchange is matched ct1 addition with ct1 subtraction in all cases so compression and decompression are how the rate change happens.
High ct changes only move in one direction, only compression vs decompression change and this is a high ct result based on low ct variations.
As long a ct changes of any size only moves in one direction, time only moves in one direction. The compression vs decompression allows entropy can go in either direction, but that doesn't change ct substitution.
Ct1 exchange is matched ct1 addition with ct1 subtraction in all cases so compression and decompression are how the rate change happens.
History
builds from prior states, but these prior states separate from their
attachments to be free to make the combinations and allow history to fall apart.
While
you have information building it is building along a set path of addition
inbalanced with subtraction of information but whatever “history” exists at a
quantum moment reflects what is being added and not what is coming out which is
potential, but not actual history which must be preserved in the present
quantum compression moment to be appreciated.
And finally, the subject of this post, sorry the figures are not included, but they are mostly included in book 5 (they will be all there in book 6):
And finally, the subject of this post, sorry the figures are not included, but they are mostly included in book 5 (they will be all there in book 6):
Figure
showing the source of vibrational effects in the universe (fpluspix).
Importantly,
as will be seen later, up to this point there is no dimension. It is worth mentioning why this is so
important. This allows the universe to
differentiate change rates. In this case,
this allows 27 changes to occur before a single ct2 change experiences time
which gives the 27:256 ratio the effect of 1:256 for those of us in a
dimensional environment.
If
there are 27 changes for a single ct2 movement it would insert an enormous
level of complexity into the solutions of o-space.
This
feature of relative change, instead of absolute change is what allows a single
change in a single variable to be experienced as if all the other changes are
operating on separate, independent variations.
At the
ct0 and ct1 states, all there is potential for positive and negative results
and in the case of fpluspix, the ability to achieve inflection point life spans
on the scale that we see with big bangs and big contractions, currently around
20 billion years apart. The specifics of this are set out in book 5...of course there are 5 books.
No comments:
Post a Comment