Pages

Thursday, January 18, 2018

Carrying dimension with us


I want to wax eloquent (complain) for a moment.
I struggled through 2200 yards swimming tonight so I could use the shower without too much guilt to shower and shave given the frozen pipes.  The 1000 im included two breaks in my much weakened condition, but I feel less guilty about the pound cake that cost me an extra 2 sheckles that will be sorely missed as I deal with the economic realities of a very expensive December.
I am making some passable progress in editing 4 books, dealing with one chapter per day in the Nostradamus science book, editing one chapter in the second romance book and moving between the various physics texts.
Nothing is happening fast enough because of problems at home.
It should be easier to deal with these, but my big plan seems to be unraveling which affects me less perhaps than the others involved, but it is nevertheless an irritant, affecting not only my plans to address the more serious aspects in my personal life, but also would have given some immediate financial purpose, apparently unavailable to the person who figured out the true symmetry of the universe.  
Of course, physicists have always been mistreated as a group, no less than one who having scooped the others now puts on airs that are not qualified, taking such a position, for example.  But I cannot help that, what is done is done and if none saw what I saw first, it is because none have suffered as much, or so I'd tell you.

Here is one of my favorite feeds, its just like sitting in your second floor room looking out the window and tomorrow it may snow.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-F4CeVsWHA

Tonight we take a chapter out of book 6

The lumpy nature of time

You might ask, correctly, if space is ct1 and a ship goes out into space, does it carry its four-dimensional presence with it?
We imagine space as four dimensional because we are four dimensional and we see space around us, but AuT suggests that the dimensional aspects of space break down outside of the higher ct state framework.
The reason the breakdown is incomplete is that the space we experience is all a part of the spatial cloud controlled or more correctly affected by the surrounding higher ct states.  The farther you get from a higher ct state, the less dimensional space should become.
If we could look at space at very low values of x, we would see it is as non-dimensional because there would be no dimensional features to affect it.
Once dimensional features are added this changes.  While the mind repels this kind of thinking, Einsteinian physics has no problem saying that we each take our own time into space. 
Hence, it is hypocritical to say we cannot take other dimensions with us.
Of course, time isn't what Einstein thought it was, but neither is space.
While Einstein and AuT have two entirely different views of what space is, space-time is something of a misnomer in AuT, both recognize that features of compressed states carry features that are not present in adjoining lower ct states.
This theory is a new way of looking at the universe free from thermodynamics.  It provides a model for how the universe operates on a fundamental level, below supersymmetry.
What is time?  It is not a dimension, it is an effect of combined prior quantum states of the universe based on a single variable controlling the entire universe. 
In the absence of time and thermodynamics, how do we examine the fundamental universe?  The footprints of the creation of the universe are fossilized within the math we use to interpret the universe.  In doing so, it will answer where forces arise, what the big bang was, why the universe expands and when it will contract.

While hard to accept initially, this paper will show how the footprints of the creation of the universe are fossilized within the mathematical models which we use to interpret the universe as we see it.  In doing so, it will answer where forces arise, what the big bang was, why the universe expands and when it will contract.

Here's a bit of audio book for those who tire of reading what I write.
https://soundcloud.com/greg-friedlander/book5autlogic

So that's the audio-which includes some edits, for the chapter on logic.  I want to encourage you to listen if you want to get some context to these posts, i.e. to hear me whining out loud instead of in my writing.




No comments:

Post a Comment