Ok, perfectly valid arguments, but there is no reason to disclose equipment designs just to save money on super-colliders. They are a perfectly reasonable way of examining fundamental partical physics even if they cannot find something that doesn't exist.
It's obvious that if all gravity is merely the tendency of all matter or energy to return to a singularity projected onto time then you're not going to find a special particals directed towards that. Matter is just an illusion place over time.
You can observe this using a high power super-collider, but not using the current methods of observation. You are not going to be able to watch film develop by looking at the film through a microscope. That's the problem with modern physics' approach. They continue to look at time space instead of time by itself. Until you get past that fundamental difference, you're stuck in o-space and you'll only get to g-space through a black hole. But you don't need to do what i've done to myself. You can just bump your particles together and look at the results, eventually, you'll go down the worm hole, from any number of points, and you'll end up in the same spot and then you'll have it figured out.
No comments:
Post a Comment