Most of Theoretical Physics has focused (incorrectly in my opinion unless you're worried about bumping into walls) on matter and energy. In Hologram theory, there is only time to worry about in the practical analysis of things.
You have Time in O-Space and everything else in G-space; understanding that o-space and g-space are merely methods of designating (not defining) the relationship between some projection of the universe (o-space) and the projector itself (g-space).
Picking up on Einstein's Hologram Principle (EHP) "the only reason for time is so everything doesn't happen at once" the critical analysis for our universe has to focus on time since everything else is in g-space. An understanding of g-space is equally critical, of course, since that is where the meat is and once we get to g-space; which we will, we are dealing with true fundamental physics and prediction, predestination and presence (or the 4 P's);but we live in time, so we're going to talk about time.
Time can come in multiple forms and perhaps it is only in one form. Keep in mind that if matter and dimensions are only funtions of time it is a truely marvelous "material" and a full understanding of it will only enrich things. I would add that the manipulation of time, is extremely discomforting and so far the most interesting method is by looking at the relationship between the singularity (g-space) and the projection (matter/energy). But for a moment, we're going to talk about the different aspects of time.
1) Cloud Time assumes that every "particle" has its own time. There will be a discussion of how the Higgs Boson "tool" (i.e. it doesn't really exist, it is just a tool to explain non-existent matter/energy in a classical quantum universe). In this way, relativity is more easily explained; and matter and energy must have quantum aspects so that they each have their own time. Higgs, in this case, makes his appearance by attaching time to each quanta. This allows for everything to exist independently and simplifies the EHP equation. EHP-m+t; m*t; etc.
2) Bubble Time: Bubble time looks good on the surface, but is probably unlikely because it assumes time is something that fits easily into space. It is forcing us back to "space time" which has already been rejected since "space time" assumes that space exists outside of time which flies in the face of the projection concept and would argue that multiple "black holes" could lead to multiple singularities. While absurd to think that light year separated black holes would go to separate singularities (obviously it's only absured to hologram theorists :)) it is a model of time that is tossed about as if we could toss time about. Bubble time assumes that matter is projected on a sheet which is "expanding". Hence time has a beginning (the same beginning for all matter/energy) and perhaps that it will expand to some maximum level and then who knows what will happen. The idea it would "pop" is somewhat disturbing, the idea that it could somehow expand and either lose some of its density or expand indefinitely without any loss of "thickness" is equally disturbing. This is one of two projection theories. In this theory there is a question of whether time gets "thicker" as it expands or whether things merely get projected onto an infinitely thin layer of time. Hence there is thick bubble time (tbt) or layer bubble time lbt EHP(tbt)=sum of (or integration of) matter/energy over time delta m/e from zero to infinity and EHP(lbt)=sum of (or integration of) (matter/energy(1)+/-matter/energy(2)). This allows both addition and subtraction of "net material" since you add times, but subtract prior matter as it were. Note that this "bubble" expands "as time" and not "in space". The expansion of the universe shoudl have nothing to do with the expansion of time.
3) Reel Time: Reel time is much like bubble time and would have a similar equation. Since the equations are "conceptual only" for this discussion (we'll get into more complete equations later, but until they give me chair at Sanford or the CERN I only have a limited amount of time to put into this) and this assumes that time comes in continuous sheets. Unlike bubble time which is linear, this assumes that there are packets of time. Instead of there being a steady expansion, time is in discreet packets, like individual slides on a reel of film (hence the designation). This would indicate at least the possibility that time could be "rewound" or that you could "skip ahead". Likewise, each "slide" of time could have cloud time qualities, although presumably if each had bubble qualities you'd end up with infinite universes (each slide would bubble out with infinite subsequent reels-i.e. there would be predestination). While Reel Time with bubble/cloud time qualities is interesting and can be solved by a combination of equations; it repudiates EPH unless all of the bubbles are identical (which defeats any purpose behind having multiple cloud/bubble slides but doesn't rule out an infinitely repetitive series of copy). Our ability to theorize in this way indicates that this quality of "reel time" is possible-an infinite number of possibilities coming off of each reel slide, as it were. These slides would have quanta and might explain why we perceive matter/energy as having quanta aspects. You have to combine the equations to get to this, but for the moment, let's just look at reel times as EHP=m/e over time1; m/e over time2; etc on to the end of the reel.
Of course, this raises the question of what happens when we reach the last sli....
4) Other Time theories: Of course there are other ways of approaching time, more on this later.
No comments:
Post a Comment