If you can travel in time you have already told your self that in a universe where every thing has happened you can see both the past and the future in its entirety. However, it is one thing to predict the future and to see into the past. That is a relatively common occurrance whether you believe in it or not. I am not saying that it actually does or does not happen, just that it can.
In my next post, I will explain how to easily undertake faster than light travel. Yes, it is easy, doesn't require much energy and is relatively obvious given what has been written and is clearly possible unlike time travel which is not.
First, however, I am going to require one comment from a physisict in each of 20 different countries, so if you really care to travel faster than light (apparently), get out to your neighborhood and regional physists and get them to send a comment to this blog. I know you can do it!
P.S. I know more about the universe than I do about how this blog program works, so don't be surprised if I've set a task for you that is impossible.
Faster than light (apparent) time trave is easy. The complicated part is going somewhere else in time.
To see the past or the future, you can go to the singularity where everything happens at once. We will have to talk about what this looks like eventually, but for now imagine a spool of film for a movie and then imagine that every image in the spool is in every frame and you approach the singularity.
If time is added to each particle to generate our vision of space, time travel would require that you move every particle either back or forward to some point while keeping your particles fixed in their presnt state. Since time gives dimension to tendencies, your tendencies would also have to be moved relative to all the tendencies in space.
While you might correctly assume this to be impossible; it is probably much easier than you'd think given the fact that in the singularity these vast distances do not exist. However, it would be unlikely.
The alternative is to have some variation of the string universe where multiple dimensions exist simultaneously which sounds great in principle, but takes a simple model for projection and complicates it greatly. In this universe, all things that happened and will happen are ongoing and maybe in infinite variety. This would mean that there were an infinite number of times and that in burning tendency it maintains each burned portion. It might also suggest that the singularity is continually bombarded with time-bombs (a play on words). While this is not a desirable model, it has a certain (insert proper french word here-thank god for the French). This is because if the singularity is continually subjected to time, it gives a reason why our universe, among the now infinite versions thereof, came into existence; albeit one that leaves us with more questions than answers.
In this case, you would not so much travel in time as you would find the bombed universe at the stage you wanted and drop to the singularity (which means giving up your time) and rejoin the new universe with some new time; perhaps stripping time off from a like tendency.
You could, in this way, potentially travel to another universe and then come back to the one where you started.
I'm waiting for those posts from physists!
No comments:
Post a Comment