TSON 4

AuT is pretty well defined. The places we will go are to get back to the roots to show how curvature works with the new underlying symmetries and to study how directional forces, net directional forces, play into the overall positive and negative atomic states we see as well as better defining the other forces that are observed in pre-AuT math.
The idea that dimension and time are different from what we observe.  But the idea of the difference between a varying universe and a set information universe are intriguing.  The idea of compression and decompression complicate this further.
We know the universe compresses and then big bangs.  The compressed states, being history begin to decompress, at least net.  In addition there is the "space pressure" which must come to some extent from the increase in the amount of information in the universe. 
One of the key elements which has not been defined yet is how does the base expansion work.

This early figure shows F-series growth, but how does this change as x increases?  One idea is taht information growth occurs only on the scale of one element, perhaps an additional -1, with each change and that -1+-1=2*-1 that somehow combines to [-1^x plus 2x(-1)^x-1] which is summed as each value of x increases.
What this means is that as x increases you see this change:
x increases by 1
f(pix) vibrates between -2 and 2 in this fashion:
x=1
f(pix)=1+-3
x=2
f(pix)=1+-3+5
x=3
f(pix)=1+-3+5+-7
While this is the denominator, it hints at something like this:

Ignoring the superfluous numbers this means that information continues to grow in this way:
1,-3,5,-7 which states exist together.
Negative 3 could only combine for a quantum instant with 1 but could combine for 3 quantum instances with 5 because the numbers would match up for that length of time before...what?

I think I will add ghosts to Nostradamus' predictions coming from the past, but first...

Chapter 4

I was angry.  I had to argue to get my speaking engagement.  “Algorithm Universe Theory (AuT) is not a minor theory.  It defines not only the source and effects of Quantum Mechanics, but the origin of space time itself.”

            “Who are the morons that I have to ask for money,” I complained as he helped me to adjust my tie.

            “They are the ones that have the money.  Now quit complainting and get out there and present your theory.

I walked out and looked at the panel.   “You all have my paper, so I’m uncertain as to why Ihave to make a presentation.  It should be fairly obvious that I have presnted a compelling argument for the circumstances surrounding the establishmnet of dimension to the universe.”

“We have you paper, but I’m unconvinced that the universe is defined by a single variable.  If it is, why can I say whetheer you get your grant or not?”

“It’s a good question, but the basic  concepts behind it is…”

“Let’s start there, in a sentence set out your theory.”

“In a sentence!  Define the universe!  Fine.  The universe is the solution to a single variable algorithm defining offsetting infinite expanding and contracting algorithms about a solution to -1.

“Variations is 0’ (-1^x) lead to F-series durable solutions varying between positive and negative states which form vibrational offsetting expanding and contracting infinite converging and diverging series in higher compression states defined by the number of places of F-series solution, the F-series in question and 2^n information arm compression series.

Inherent in the solutions is an evolving curvature associated with the place based compression of information.  Observed spiral curvature is an effect and not a cause of this solution…”

          “Put in in terms of a draft hypothesis,” one of the men said interrupting me.  He had dark hair, intense eyes.  Eyes that showed no acceptance, disbelieving eyes. 

          “A single…”

          “More than one if you want.”  It was some bizarre test to him Ibelieved.

I tried to keep myself from swearing.  Looking into the wings he was making calm down gestures.  I almost laughed.  What would the muse want me to do, I wondered.  “Draft hypothesis one: The universe is an information based system based on a self-generating single variable algorithm of the following rough form: Sum(x=1 to infinity) Fseries/Information interaction (defined by each element changing (with x) but also the sum of all (changing) elements begin added in the prior two quantum embodiments to form the current quantum state of the universe) where each of the embodiments are offset from each prior embodiment by a definition of pi changing based on an infinite converging series restricted and modified regionally by the value of x, the single variable and by solution order.

“Draft hypothesis two:  Dimension and time (sct) arise from the relative stacked changes of the higher ct states interacting with “carrier spirals” formed by the stacking of ct1 states. The "old version" of the big bang has been equated to "let there be light."  The AuT version says that time and dimension only existed when photonic light emerged as a compressed form of information from the time and space independent ct1 state (what is called space by most people) and became measurable based on the relative changes of photons to space.

“Draft hypothesis…er..three: The AuT version says that time and dimension only existed when photonic light emerged as a compressed form of information from space (an independent ct1 state); and “standard clock time” became measurable based on the relative changes of photons to space which also appears coincidentally to say that at the beginning of time (standard clock time) there was light. “

I realized I was sweating.  If Ionly had a hndkerchief, but there was nothing,
noting to do but continue, “Draft hypothesis five, no four: There is a distinction between organized informational change based on converging infinite series and illusory entropy based changes which appear based on a poor understanding of the background algorithms defining the series.”

“I don’t see how you can believe something like this.  Is there some observed basis for these four hypothesis?” One of the others interjected.  It was an older physicist, one who I suspected was angry that someone would say that everything he had ever learned had been wrong.

“AuT is a theory which defines the origins of quantum mechanics, movement and time.  It defines aging, what is also called standard clock time (SCT), as an effect of the verging and diverging infinite series which average over the universe and occur as quantum information states.   True time is nothing more than changes of a single variable (x) that defines SCT free quantum moments in a dimensionally free universe.”

Continue with the hypothesis presentation,” the  black haired skeptic said.

“Draft Hypothesis….err…

          “It is five,”  So he was listening at least.

 “Five, yes,  History is created through stacking of prior universe solutions.  History is persevered by maintaining the stacked solutions in an otherwise quantum universe.  Changes in the current universe (quantum value of x) relative to those prior universes (beginning at x-1) in response to the variations in the single variable cause history to become less predictively relevant over time and compression states.

          When I began discussing Hawkins’ book on the Hologram Universe said it was apparent that something much more elegant was happening than a projected hologram, an idea which was memorialized a year later in a work which raised the questions that led to this theory embodied herein.  The Einstein Hologram Universe” sought to reconcile Hologram theory with something that was, at that time, too ephemeral to fully differentiate from existing theory. Now there is also the question of the past coming from a breakdown of…”

          “Are you trying to say that the future is the breakdown of the compressed past in your paper?”

“That is only part of it.  It is complicated because there is only net decompression, so history is embodied in the future even as the past breaks down to power, at least partially the present.  There is also the addition of information with the variable...”

“You’re not clear on every point?”

“If I was finished, I would not need to continue my research.  While many of the AuT breakthroughs were conceptualized, a clear understanding of what black holes was, for example were not made.  Worse still, a blockade remained at the point of “the big bang.”   That barrier has now been torn down, reduced to mathematical kindling and a universe exponentially older has been revealed, the big bang resolved into an event of relative insignificance, an inflection point.”

“I think we’ve heard enough,” the dark haired man said looking to the others who nodded.

I had not even started on the meat of my presentation when I was ushered out of the room and another presenter took my place.

TSON Chapter 3

The first edition will be sloppy, half written, but finished quickly.
I will, perhaps include this to the reader..."This work is being published in rough form for those who would be more interested in the science than the writing.  If you want to get more deeply into the mathematics, you should read the following books on this subject....I hope the second edition will be rewritten a bit more artfully."
And how like a horror story and how like a love story.  Have to be careful not to get off track

Chapter 3

“I think I am writing this only because she wants me to.”

“You have your own willpower, just stop.”

“I cannot.  I am obsessed with the ideas.”  I said this, but was it my obsession or hers?  How much was I in control...My thinking was cut off when he started speaking again.

“Your ideas,” he laughed.  “Your ideas are mathematical, those of these ancients were…occult.  The supernatural, mystical, magic.”

“That isn’t entirely true.”

“You’re saying Nostradamus claimed to base his predictions on science?”

“Not publicly.   But he hid what he was really doing.  He had travelled to Italy and had access to the works of the middle east as a result, those having been refined by Fibonacci.  But what was he really doing?  He called his form astrology, something he practiced not as the supernatural, but in the form of a series of farmer’s almanacs, very accurate ones.”

“Like Benjamin Franklin?”

“Exactly the same, although his were years in advance, his incorporated the same type of side stories, including forecasting future events.  He was very much a mathematician in this way,  calculation of the planets and stellar bodies in relationship to the earth is the same type of geometric study that Algorithm theory relies on.

“And he studied classical historians like Plutarch and Moses if you accept him as the author of the bible and Moses studied under the Egyptians who were also great astronomers of their day.  He was much closer to those sources than we can be today.  Perhaps even copies of the original works of Parmenides existed.”

“Plutarch is not Parmenides.”

“Not directly, but he was a biographer of the ancients.  Indeed, he identified himself with Plato.”

“Plato?”

“Zeno was Parmenides’ student, Socrates was Zeno’s student, Plato was Socrates’ student and Plutarch was the biographer of Plato.  And he ended his life as an Oracle at Delphi.”

“Michel de Nostradame  was born December of 1503 in the South of France.  He wrote “The Prophecies” in 1555, when he was 51 or 52 years old.  In today’s lime frame he would have been in his 70’s or 80’s.  He had early learned Latin, Greek and Hebrew which must have played an important part in his studies.”

“It seems largely irrelevant to my studies,” I replied.

“In 1538 he traveled to Italy.”

“Really, to Italy?”

“Yes, why is that so interesting to you.  He was apparently running from a ruinous accusation of heresy.  He would have never made it back were it not for the plague which largely silenced the church.”

“Nothing only Italy…is so closely connected with North Africa.  It was much more just an extension of the middle east, not separated by the suez canal, but connected both by the Mediterranean and overland routes that cut the world in half.”

“I don’t see what that has to do with your theory?”

“Well, this was hundreds of years later, during the plague years, but it was also a time of the renaissance.  Leonardo da Vinci had only died a few years before, but…”

“What?”

“The Renaissance was powered by the Arabic numbering system.  Leonardo Pisano, Leonard da Pisa, a Christian raised during the time of the Moors’ rule in Italy, brought that from middle east.  His book, “the book of the abacus” was finished in 1202, he was born around 1175 so he would only have been..27 years old.  Around then he became known as Fibonacci, a shorthand version of his name.  But his original work was updated 26 years later, he would have been 53, roughly the same age as Nostradamus when the final copy was written.”

“You used the Fibonacci series.  This Leonardo invented it?”

“No…the Arabic numbering system was invented, or at least reduced for historical purposes, by a Persian, Al-Khwarizmi, around 825. I have no idea how old he was when it was written.  The F-series…well, that seems to have been prevalent in the middle east among the mathematicians, but why, I don’t know.”

“Why is age important?”

“It’s not just…”

“What?”

“When I wrote my first version, “The Einstein Hologram Universe.”  

“Let me guess, you were 53.”

“No, 55.  And while close, it was not exact science.  Perhaps you need to reach a certain age to finish something like this.

“My work was refined in “Non-Linear Time Theory.” That title was abandoned as being confusing given an unrelated model by that name and a determination that coordinate change and not time was the key element to an NLC, Non-linear coordinate, universe.  Of course, I did not have another’s math to work from.  I was working from a place of…I’m not sure.

“The early thought was that coordinates were only results from a fixed algorithm, but I’m not sure that was what I understood back then.  I was trapped initially in space time from a more traditional stance.

“I was wrong because I thought of the universe as having a fixed amount of information.  That was because of the teachings of physics which were both certain on that issue and obviously wrong mathematically.  The problem was ‘the big bang’ which was completely misunderstood until my work redefined it.”

“But no one recognizes your work.  No, they do not, but they will.”

          AuT proves that the universe's grand design is just a very simple algorithm intertwined to the point that the windings and unwinding on quantum levels cannot be experienced except as apparent randomness.  The result is supersymmetry. 

          The algorithm governs the generation of force and there is no force in the sense that we define force that effects these changes.  

          The basic algorithms are converging infinite series matched with diverging series which cycle between net expansion and net compression both locally and for the universe.

          The differentiation equation giving rise to gravity is an equation that changes when solutions give rise to linearity and the associated features which give rise to compression and decompression to yield the various forces we experience.

          This equation starts with a non-relativistic aspect experienced as gravity when two dimensions in the form of two places interact in a ct1-ct2 matrix which exists within the solution order of ct1.  The other forces we experience are derived from this same equation. The infinite reach of gravity requires that it be a ct1 phenomenon which is a non-dimensional framework.  The same is true of photons, but these function according to ct1 exchange.

          If we have two masses far away from everything but space, then you have m1 and m2 and if they are held stationary relative to each other for a period you have a relatively simple math model.

          There is not “still, because all points will change with each change in x and for higher ct states, the replacement of ct1 states is movement although relative sharing has unexpected results, like compression and gravity. 

          In our example with two masses, each absorbs a certain amount of ct1 in order to maintain stable position to one another and to present unraveling decompression.  This absorption is both internal, sharing ct1 states between different ct2 spirals, and external, corresponding with movement relative to everything else and each other.  Some ct1 exchange is required because movement is a requirement of the algorithm.

          The relative solution order is preserved, otherwise distance changes, and gravity between two masses stays the same because of the fixed ratio of ct1 exchange (1:256).

          If other ct states are present and stable to each other, ct1 states must be absorbed in a manner to maintain a steady state. That occurs with ct4 but we are going to use two stable quantum ct4 states in space to minimize distractions and to allow us to add other ct states into the mix as we continue the discussion.  To make it even less complicated we are going to use quantum ct4 states.  It seems likely that quantum ct4 doesn't exist in a vacuum because it appears, and observations show that quantum ct4 states require a substitution rich orbit (proximate solution) of ct3 states.

          This analysis applies to ct2 states, but since those don't experience mass the same way and since it appears that they change relative to each other more immediately, that is they move relative to one another more with each change in x due to convergence (infinite converging series), you get a different approximation than with the larger mass states.  In other words, this process with ct2 states would be cleaner and would include the same perturbation that you see with the geo function based on the evolving solution of pi based curvature which is driven by the changes in the amount of information (essentially a function of, at very high values of x, very large changes in the denominator making tiny changes in the value of the geo function).

          Knowing the net effect (the gravity equation) and that the change in ct1 over a value of x (time in this case is present since we have ct4 states) is equal to the gravitational force generated.  Mathematically then

dct1/dx=m1*m2/r^2.

          The equation is using two different scales, but r is the number of ct1 states separating the two ct4 states.  The mass is proportional to (an equivalent of) the number of ct1 states making up the mass and that over a set time period these are exchanged externally at a set rate, and in particular between the two masses. 

          The reason that gravity appears to warp space time (over several values of x) is because of this feature of pulling ct1 states in from the surrounding ct1 environment to make up for those absorbed by mass as it moves.  For quantum states two masses would not change nor would the surrounding space matrix, but over a long values of x the appearance of curvature exists.

          The exchange of ct1 states where one moves from one ct4 state to another ct4 state gives rise to a different equation, the strong and weak forces, according to which lower state the substitution is affecting (ct3 or ct2 states).

TSON-chapter 2

Yes, I'm going to tortue you with my bit of self serving rewrite, more of a repositioning.  Having accidently stumbled upon a mathematical basis for the work of Nostradamas, I will turn it into a "commercial" work in the hope of getting my theories more widely read.  I have 50,000 words of math in Book 2 which means I can, by adding 10,000 words of fiction, turn the most important theory...ever...in mathematics into something the broader world might understand.
Much of the other work must be on hold for this so I will share it with you to amuse you, I hope, while the first edition is put in place.  You should be studying the books written in any event.
I will, as time allows, over the next couple of weeks, as I take this magnificent work of physics and turn it into crap for the masses. 
Perhaps it will entertain someone, I will be happy enough if it entertains you.

There is a part of the most recent science which within this I will develop to some extent.

"AuT shows, however that the future in a net expansion universe, is built from the present, which in effect means it is built from the past being steadily released at a ratio which entropy suggests is greater, perhaps much greater than the degree to which the future results from a new combination of past events.

Moreover, this breakdown which will occur and which is occurring comes forth in the form of electromagnetic phenomena, carrying portions of the future with it.  It is energy in the form of waves.  The present is built from the compressed past which is the future.  A compressing universe has a more hidden future, but not an expanding one. 

One asks what is the most dangerous aspect of AuT, it is the ability to see the future which mathematically, may be easier than in other theories where the nature of history is misunderstood."

On this idea a book with some mystery and some horror, the one genre I haven't written, can be built.  To do so, perhaps I should take the most precious thing and turn it into a monster?

Chapter 2: The Greek Muse

          “I began my studies in the cold damp of a New Orleans winter.  Winter has now come again,”  I told the Muse.

          I met the Muse under the strangest of circumstances.  I could not tell how old she was, for she seemed very young, but there was a touch of some half hidden wisdom, in certain light she looked absolutely ancient, as if she were an entirely different person.  And I was not able to get too close to her.

          How many times had I met her before now?  A dozen, perhaps?  Each time there was some barrier between us.  Today, however, I had gotten an invitation to her house.  Others were there, but they were outside the large double doors to type of hidden grotto.  While others swirled around us, it seemed as if we were alone.

          I longed to be truly alone with her, but she was with one of the sequence of lovers she had.  They were the kings of industry, successful professional men.  I did not dare to compete with them, especially in my current circumstances.

          She had noted the small notebook I had and asked me about it.  “And how did they begin?” She asked.  There was something in her voice that I could not place, musical?  No, authoritative, entrancing.  I didn’t want to answer honestly, but I could not help myself.

          “I lost everything in speculation,” I began.  I had told no one else about this, but for some reason, I shared it with her.  “I had decided on a life of pursuing wealth, and when the wealth was gone, I had to turn to something else.  There was only one thing I had in my life that was untouched.”

          “And what was that,” she asked, almost laughing?  She seemed to always be on the verge of laughing at what I said.  My embarrassed financial situation seemed to interest her not at all.”

          “My mathematics, my physics really.”

          “Let me see what you’ve wrote.”

          “Really?  It’s quite boring.” But I handed the notebook which I had been writing in.  She read out loud.

          “The first thing I discovered was that history and dimension were not what I thought they were.  One of the last things I began to determine, was that that time and time are not what I thought they were.”

          “It’s silly, I know.”

          “No, fascinating.”  She read quietly for another moment.  She seemed to be debating whether to continue.  At last she said,  “It is like the work of Zeno.”

          “Who?”  I was hurt at first.  Had someone come to my conclusions before me?  Then I was curious.  I was a physicist, but I did not know that name, someone famous enough that the muse would know of him.  The name sounded ancient.

          “Parmenides, would be better, but his work no longer exists.”   She said this as if she had read his work before.  “You should read his work, you might find it interesting.  It is a shame, Nostradamus’ work did not survive.”

          “His prognostications?  I think there are well preserved.”

          “His mathematics, his studies in history.”

The science of nostradamas

It starts.  It is dark I can only write this under the cover of darkness, even though there is fear in what you cannot see.  I need to warn you darling.  Do not continue with this book.  There is more to fear in life than the monsters of stories and movies and this book will endanger everything that you hold dear.  Time itself will cease to have the same meaning.
I tell you to read no further, but if you insist...
You are the love of my life.  I know at this time and with all of the things stacked against us, that is unfair for me to say, you who have so many lovers.  But if you know me at all, you know how much I love  you, how I hold all of your faults as gifts, how beautiful the sound of your voice is to me, how precious the time we spent togther has been and how I long to spend whatever part of eternity is left to us together.    If you cannot feel it then you must see how I look into your eyes, hang onto your words how I relish the taste...but I go too far, to a place that is too dear to me to put into words.  If there is great danger in writing this, in reading it is an equally terrible danger, but I want to tell you what happened from my perspective.
This is a gothic horror story set in modern time, or perhaps it is just a way for me to put my story in front of a broader audience.  You can decide.
Early in the story, I will introduce a monster, but it will be up to you to decide who is the true monster in the story.
It starts many years before when i was a student, long before i could explain the science. long before I met the muse, and hence long before this story  truely begins; but every story has to begin somewhere.  I left the warm climates of my initial studies to pursue passions in the ice covered mountains.
injured in the heart of winter, when the others left I was forced to,forced to stay in until boredom forced me to leave my rooms.  The Halls were open and in one i
ran into the physics teacher, the books of learning were put up and his private studies remained. He poured over an ancient text that was delivered in a box filled with straw and all manner of postage. A borrowed book alleged to be part of the library of Nostradamas.  "There is nothing in here," Dr. Hardt says shaking his head.  He has the long grey hair and beard of a senior physicist profession.  He seems a little whimsical to my young eyes.  In my old age, I wonder if he lives still, if he'd remember the oral test administered me earlier in the year, how I filled the chalkboard with equations and he slashed  through one and another until all that was left were a few short lines.  "Why do you think you solved this in such a round about way," he asked.  

"It just seemed like it belonged there."

He reminds me of that day with a laugh.  "It was the strangest math, now I wish that Ihad somehow preserved it.  I've never sense seen the solution given in just that way."

I am embarrassed with my awkwardness in physics.  "Why this book?  Isn't it occult, not science."

He is quiet.  Then he pulls out an old paper, "I found this, it was done in World War II.

I look over it, it appears to be a study of some time, "Ninety percent?  Is that the answer?"

He looks at me, surprised.  "That was quickly done."

"I just looked at the end.  But its 90 percent of what?"
"When Nostradamus was studied in World war II my profession and I were on a team.  This is sstill top secret although why is anyone's guess."  

"You dont seem to feel that way," I said noting the sarcastic tone of his voice and something, was it fear?

"Based on what was known at the time it was felt there was a 90% chance that Nostradamus did see into the future."
"You gest," I said laughing a little.

Dr. Hardt did not laugh.  "Imagine what a weapon, it would make.  It is thought perhaps it was nkown to Greeks and the Jews.  It would go a long way to expain why the israelis and greeks could defeat much stronger armies."
"There was no technology so there must be another way."
"A way to see the future?  Surely that is impossible."

"Is it?  I suppose it is, but hitler pursued it but failed to find it before he perished."

I looked over the probability.   "This is science.  If it is good science than the workings of Nostradamus must be governed by science."
It was a long time after that that this book was started.  This book covers the sicence of Nostradamas, practically it explains the physics behind seeing the future.  It is not a "theoretical" study nor does it require a working knowledge of what Nostradamas did or predicted.  It is the independently developed science of true quantum mechanics and how it applies to predicting the future.  It is a work of science, mathematics and physics so don't expect it to be the easiest read ever.
One of the early things you will find in this book is that history and time are not what you think they are.  In order to understand this a lengthy discussion of how the universe works is necessary and it will answer many questions you have about the universe and will explain fundamentally what time is.
In fact, what we experience as "the future" is the break down of the past.  As such a person or a piece of equipment should be capable of picking through the information in order to piece together what has already happened from what is and what has happened before.
To understand this you have to accept information in a fundamentally different way, how it builds up and how it breaks down and how we fit into that process at this point in time in the universe.
Fundamentally the way of the universe is offsetting infinite series.
The amount of information is always increasing, the so call "push" of empty space, but this is also offset by the compression of information, the most common example of this being fusion, but other examples will be given.  Moreover, it will be seen that the "future" is a mix of these states and that at our point in time in the universe, the future is made up of more of a degrading past than it is of a compressing future.

It should perhaps remain unpublished.  Perhaps that is why the work of the ancients can no longer be found, but I have to write it to you.

AuT-steps in compression and why the future is the result of entropying the past

Well, I explained how nostradamus could have done his thing and what?
that's right, still nothing.  The universe is a perverse little thing.  It's hard to get into the heads of my readers, seeing the universe for the first time clearly and...what?  I can see how the universe develops, its most inner workings, looking backwards and forwards trillions of years and beyond time and even space in either direction, well sort of in either direction, and yet I don't know if I'm getting through to you at all.
I wonder if you wonder about the relevance of what you read.  Do you share it?  Do you go to sleep thinking about me as I go to sleep thinking about you?
Book 2 is present in both forms and while it isn't complete by itself, it's probably the most complete version incorporating as it does 95% of the grant which has to be self explanatory.  There are volumes yet to write.
Let's talk about patterns
Zero may be in there somewhere, it may not be.  This is the realm of g-space and for the moment, rather than answer questions of great isgnficance to those who would ignore me, let me assume that i'll die, lealve a mystery and you will suffer for it.
First visible step is -1, the most powerful apparent number in g-space.
2) -1^x
3) 2x(-1)^x-1
4) 2*y/(pix^(2n+1)
5) f(n)
6) 2f(n)^(2n)
The existence of intermediary steps after step 6 is observed and n varies from 1-infinitity.

Let's look at time dilation in this context.
You have x
You have a multiple of x moving from positive to netative values (ct1)
As the amounts of ct1 increase you begin to have 1:ct1 changing relative to 256 ct2 states.
The ratios from here on out allow relative perception changes even though at the ct0 state and to some extent in the ct1 state continue to be at the same rate for the constituent parts of the higher states.
The change in x is at a single rate, likewise the movement between positive and negative values continue to change at the same rate, but the length of the transition value between these positive and negative values, get longer and longer and provide a perspective for relative change.
Time dilation and aging suggest that the features of these larger chains 256 to 1, etc change relative to the surrounding environment to create first velocity at a 1:256 exchange and in higher states, even wave states where the difference is not observed, a sharing state and an exchange state which also have a ratio. 
10^16 to 1 is the ratio of change of ct3 to ct4.
The maximum rate of change of 1:256 is preserved within this (at light speed) based on:
10^2^4 (ct4)
*6^2^3 (ct3)
*4^2^2 (ct2) 
The transition between ct2 and ct1 at 256:1 is a more perfect transition since the shift otherwise breaks down to transitional changes which are viewed as electromagnetism even though they remain viable.  These changes are bidirectional meaning that they travel from positive to negative and from negative to positive.

The exchange rates between ct3 and ct4 are not at 256:1 that would create light speed and a break down instead exchanges occur within the matrix as positive and negative changes require the balance to shift.  The "within the matrix" includes between transitional states, PEP suggesting that these exchanges are between transitional states to achieve a balanced result.  The balance that appears relatively perfect at ct4 (electron) states, becomes imbalanced within transitions although the transition arms that exist in either direction (combining and decombining) suggest that there is a near constant imbalance giving rise to less than perfect velocity and less than perfect substition.

Because exchanges are constant at every level and only relative change gives rise to perception the calculation of any point becomes complicated.  AuT spends most of its time looking a compression, but the anti-compression aspects which presumably include a brea(down in information at a level where time doesn't exist raises issues about what can be determined from gross observations of information.

To understand this, let's look at the current universe, about 1/10th of the way towards the net inflection point where the flow of information will exchange from decompression towards compression.
There are huge accumulations of compression which will eventually decompress up to a point.  As they do so, they release information stored about the past which give rise to our sense of history as much as that history is preserved by building the next time state from the past.  To understand this let's look at  a brief historical event; the decision to walk outside.
Past information states are combining in order to create a sequence.  In a net expansion universe, presumably as much as 10 times as much compressed information is decompressing compelling (in what we view as entropy) the movement towards the out of doors.  This release of information from a compressed state is visible as history even though it is coming from the present and even though the next moment will be the result of a combination of past information.
It looks like this on a net scale:

forx=1 (x-1+x-2=x)
for y=1 to 10 (y=y-1+y-2)

In a decompressing universe where entropy is increasing you have this relative massive net release of information to get the sense of time.  Because this happens in transition states between higher and lower compression states it is smooth, but it also results in a 1:10 net movement which is why things seem to be moving so fast.

It also shows, however that the future in a net expansion universe, is built from the present, which in effect means it is built from the past being steadily released at a ratio which entropy suggests is greater, perhaps much greater than the degree to which the future results from a new combination of past events.

Indeed, without this there would be no predictability to the universe, but the importance of this to how AuT can be used is enormous and unconventional.  But more on this later, perhaps.  God forbid you'd buy one of my books or ask me to lecture on these issues.

AuT Durabilty and curvature, reading the future and finding g-space.

I have republished book 2 which now contains most of the most uptodate information on durabilty and curvature which is repeated below.  The importance of this, other than anchoring my place as the primier physicst of all time, said in as much jest as I can modestly muster, is that it gives the specific derivation between a positive and negative (-1^x) universe to one which is based on F-series, information type compression and (by combination of 1 and 2 from different compression states) standard clock time and relativity.
Predicting the Future:
I discuss the idea that change in x, affection only ct0, is not time which is only a function where ct0 coverts to ct1.  Indeed just as information comes together to form the future, so it breaks down, creating in essence an anti-time.  For those who question how Nostradamus could predict the future, you need only understand that it is possible to tap into the anti-matter, anti-electron, anti-time, anti-history stream where combined information states forming the future act in reverse to see how this is possible.  Hence, there are two ways to see the future using AuT.  The first is to observe phenomena in line with the net compression or decompression state on a gross scale in order to predict what the universe is having us move towards.  The second is on the opposite scale where we look at the future breaking down and observe the history embodied in that stream of decaying information.
Relative Change:
The idea of relative change of one compressed state to another is where time arises as we experience it, as a '4th dimension' there being no dimension before a comparison between ct1 (space) and ct2 (photonic features) even though some form of information (ct0) existed beforehand and can be 'seen' through its effects and through the transition from -1^x to sin-type transitions and the independent f-series and 2^n simultaneous solution/compression features.
The perfect theory
Indeed, AuT was so perfect from a theoretical aspect, that before the methodology was mathematically set out, the existence of the transitions was seen allowing (1) multiple coordinates to change together, at least relative to higher states (2) for the rates of change to vary between the different ct states to allow for (a) clock time and (b) dimension and (c) time dilation which are required to have perception of the universe and a (d) framework from which separation can exist on different levels and (e) offsetting infinite expanding and infinite compressing series along with (f) a vibrational aspect dating back to the underlying -1^x "super carrier." While defined, these conceptually have been aluded to since Spirals in Amber, if not before, but to mathematically plot them is substantial if mathematically unchallenging.
You can be forgiven for not seeing the true beauty in this. However, I am putting my name in the hat for the greatest physicist ever, so you ask, "what is greater than the origin of space time and an explanation of all heretofor unknown, observed phenomena and predictability of the universe?" 

The Answer

The answer is that ct0 toct1 is a different mathematical function. Indeed ct0 is different from ct1, not having a direct connection to curvature and associated more directly with -1^x.  So?  So, It points the way towards other infinite series that function in a similar fashion (to the ct0-ct1 transition) and to a pattern that leads all the way back to g-space! Dare I say it..Of course I do. Through the pain you caused me, through your ignoring me and leaving me to go blind and starve, I have have opened a pathwall alltheway to the almighty. And, I suppose,that is still not enough for you.  Your gods forbid that I be invited to lecture, better you treat me like all the other superstitious twits in the face of truth, burn me at your metaphysical stake, it is no less than I deserve.

Getting Back to Things.
While a complete reading of books 1-4 (1,3 and 4 will need some editing to be fully compliant) and the soon to be released book amended book 4 and new book 5 is necessary to complete understanding, the primary section, previously published in this blog in unedited form is set out below as it appears now in book 2.
As mentioned, book 2 currently benefits from several upgrades, including the most recent spreadsheets, correcting the defect which was distracting because the inaccuracy raised questions about how the transition applied which are elminated by the corrected spreadsheets.

Before we get to today's post, I note.

So I'm reading 3 empires on the nile by Green which is one of those well researched works that are thoroughly enjoyable.  Having written about africa in this area, it has is very interesting and I'm think may even go into the first absynnian war which predates my book only by a little.  It is a beautiful work of historical research.  I look forward to commenting further.

Today's post:

Durability and Curvature

Durability can be shown graphically for curvature creation.

Figure 5

          Figure 5 shows the vibrational nature and the preservation of states.  This gives the impression of durability of results and also the importance of transitions between these states.  The length between 1 and -2 (CT0 Values is -3 (Transition value) (the transition direction is negative), between -2 and 3 is 5; between 3 and -4 is -7.  I.E. the distance between any state and the next higher state gives the same result as the denominator for pi which gives a ratio (for the total amount of information) between two F-series states.

          What pi reflects is -1^x+2x(-1)^x-1; which in turn reflects this transition.

          X=1=-1+2(1)(-1)^0=1

          X=2=-3

          X=3=5,etc.

          This recurring pattern defines the denominator for pi and is the base for comparison to higher states which is critical to both curvature and to compression.  It also reflects the difference between each state in the alternating positive and negative state building independent of the underlying state (ct0 value) as positive or negative and instead uses the transition direction to create positive or negative states in higher ct states.

          Figure 5 is interesting because it shows the derivation of the denominator (comparison ratio) as a function of moving towards or away from compression.

Looking at the -3 this is the distance between -1 and -2 (away from compression).  5 is the distance (transition value) from -2 to 3 (compression/positive movement).  For high values of x this movement towards or away from compression gets very high.

          We are used to thinking of the fixed value as either positive or negative controls, but that doesn't work very well with the model where there is a single positive or negative charge for unitary objects.  If it were the measure of single objects it would require a very small deviation.

          However, if what we see as positive and negative is merely the net movement towards or away from an inflection point, it can be seen it is either positive or negative except at that one point.

          You ask, why?

          The simple answer is that the derivation of dimension is driven by the sin type equations which are, at their heart, quantum equations.  We are taught that since they are functions of y they have true curvature, but if AuT teaches anything, it is that pi is fixed for any fixed amount of information and for any fixed combination of compression states.

          Hence, the smooth curve of the sin equation is individual net movements either up or down making the sin curve (by virtue of adding all of those points together at least above ct1 which is where we observe positive and negatives.

Transition to Fibonacci series

          Comparison of higher states to the ct0-ct1 comparison gives pi higher states being f-series starting with 2^(2^2)=8.

          Stability is locking something in a freezer, putting longer states together.

AuT more posts and New!

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/techandscience/the-universe-should-not-actually-exist-cern-scientists-discover/ar-AAu23E9?ocid=sf

One day, you'll be explaining to someone that you followed my posts all along.  They'll say, why didn' t you invite the most brillian physicist of your time to speak?  I just want it on the record that I'm still looking for those invitations.

I'm not going to follow up on my last post because of an important announcement.  The amended book 2, 2nd edition mod1 is going to be available tomorrow.   it's probably available right now, but some of the corrected spreadsheets may bleed off the page and i need to put a correced copy up to fix that printing error.  the hard copy can also be ordered.

Filling in the gaps.

The second modification of the second edition, really a third edition, of book 2 is being published as we speak.  By next week, you'll have the much updated version with the corrected spreadsheets and all of the information developed in this blog up till today.  I high recommend if you have an interest in the universe, that you obtain a copy.  If you purchased an old copy and bring it by my office in the next few weeks, I'll replace your copy.

The basic underlying features of both volumes are the same, but much of the detail associated with the derivation of space from pre-space phenomena and other issues such as the application of PEP in at least its first drafts are included in the new editions.  It's not so much a rewrite as the middle section is updated to include the corrected spreadsheet and a few observations on the derivation of space from ct0, a pretty important aspect.

A question I am often expecting to be asked is why isn't x time?  Its a good question and the general reason is that there is no "aging" as x increases.   The amount of information goes up and quantum instants are defined by changes in x, but time as we recognize it does not exist without a relative change between two ct states.

I hear dumb stuff about time and entropy all the time, being surrounded by people who do not understand AuT physics (because they haven't seen it.  Question like "is time smooth or quantum (obviously qunatum).  The problem is people see space as smooth, which its  quantum too.  The see curves as quantum, same problem, they cannot see the quantum aspects so they assume they re not there, while AuT solves for them and explains how the co-exist.  The fact that there is a single variable for the entire universe also is mind blowing until you think about how obvious it is.
Another one is whether time started with the big bang or even what is the big bang, both highly aggravating.   Now if you said, what is the environment where x changes, what causes it to change (it doesn't necessarily change since it could be all numbers and changes free of time) and how is the algorithm created and held in place I'd say those are darn good questions.  You could say they are thoughts in god's mind and in some ways you would be right no matter what the answer.
The issue of why time only goes in one direction, also irritating.  X changes in one direction only to the extent that whatever value you have for x, the universe is a certain way (all of it because of the single variable issue).  That keeps you from going back in time as a separate entity (although this issue is dealt with earlier since the universe could probably absorby rouge information although it would no longer be the same universe, it would also be pretty darn similar; but woudl x affect the new information or would you be stagnate in teh new universe?  Probably is my answer although that's a question for another day.   The fact is that time probably does goe both ways, we just don't see it that way because of our idea that the direction of information change is the same as time which it isn't. exactly.  This is where the aging issue comes up.  As substitutions occur without net inflection point changes, we see that as aging.  Absolute velocity is, in such a case, total invlection point change for the higher state in question or light speed.  This also requires more analysis than I'm willing to go into, but book 2 does discuss  time dilation which is a version of this.  The fact is however, that these changes which we see as disorder are only disorder while the universe is in a net expansive phase, otherwise, the amount of order is decreasing because velocity is decreasing and compression and shared state aging increases.  This is worth a longer look, but not tonight.

AuT-more posts and space 2

There is not enough evidence of pre-AuT physics to justify the flogging of a cat.  In this discussion of flaws present in pre-AuT physics, the role of AuT physics is set out.


https://futurism.com/physicists-discover-possible-break-standard-model-physics/

This first article points out that traditional physics fails to properly account for the decay rate observed for Taus which AuT would designate an "unstable" transitional state between ct4 and ct5.

http://gizmodo.com/new-calculation-could-spell-trouble-for-a-popular-theor-1796264033
This second article corrrectly points out that the standard model for the beginning of the universe is flawed.  As AuT points out geometry and time evolved.  Correctly, these physicist predicted an early universe having a wave function (defined in a prior post for AuT) and perhaps an initil particle that embodied this.  Incorrectly, these pre-AuT physicists saw the particle as important and also saw time introduced at this early stage.
AuT correctly points out that the so called "particle" is nothing more than a mathematical potential which is formed into pre-space forms and then compressed into space forms before time as we view it exists and before there are any "particles."  That being said, if you eliminate 90% of the background noise, these ideas support AuT substituting durable values of x for time and information states for particles you begein to approach the correct approach.
Unfortunately, pre-AuT physics completely unravels shortly after that; at least in this article, as "randomness" the non-existent bugaboo in pre AuT physics is poured into the mix in order to justify the existence of the scientists writing or reviewing the articles.
There is also the discussion of bounce type universes, an idea which is entirely consistent with AuT except that bounce universes in prior theories rely on "gravity" whereas AuT universes rely on mathematics, namely net inflection points from expansion and compression due to negative and positive undelrying values, the area being explored in the current series of posts.
The article correctly points out that pre-aut physics is inadequate for the job which we know is because it is not AuT physics.

https://futurism.com/researchers-break-a-100-year-old-fundamental-limitation-of-physics/
https://phys.org/news/2017-06-year-old-physics-problem.html
the length of time a wave could be stored was inversely proportional to its bandwidth. Using a magnetic field (transitional ct1-ct2 sates) the length of storage is increased.  Conceptually, what AuT would suggest is that the transitional states allow for longer substitution than would be otherwise present.  This is not a new item in AuT, instead it is alorithm driven to have these longer lasting stored states which ultimately rely on the pre-determined math.  While they may be maintained for very long periods of time, the algorithm dictates how they will be kept alive.
Why this article out of the billions to review?  Because it speaks to a more important aspect of AuT, prediction.  One troubling area where AuT interacts with the real work lies in radioactive research.  The scientists of the prior two articles would call these scientific advances of a dangerous nature.  AuT, on the other hand, would say that compression/decompression cycles dictate that we increase the concentration of fissionable materials.  If we are able to determine to what end this is done, we might well determine our own "length of time."
The whole 'probabiiity of things' which is such nonsense in a true quantum universe is replace with 'if we're tending towards it there is a reason, and tending towards concentratomg fossionable materialse , amd of we are tending towards that there is a reaon and it doesn't bode well.  can we do anything about it, not really, but we can at least see how stupid we are.

What government official said not enough evidence to flog a cat-relative to mata hari after she was executed?

Figure 5 shows the vibrational nature and the preservation of states.  This gives the impression of durability of results and also the importance of transitions between these states.  The length between 1 and -2 is -3 (direction is negative), between -2 and 3 is 5; between 3 and -4 is -7.  I.E. the distance between any state and the next higher state gives the same result as the denominator for pi which gives a ratio (for the total amount of information) between two F-series states.

What pi reflects is -1^x+2x(-1)^x-1; which in turn reflects this transition.

          X=1=-1+2(1)(-1)^0=1

          X=2=-3

          X=3=5,etc.

This recurring pattern defines the denominator for pi and is the base for comparison to higher states which is critical to both curvature and to compression, but it also reflects the difference between each state in the alternating positive and negative state building.Figure 5 is interesting because it shows the derivation of the denominator (comparison ratio) as a function of moving towards or away from compression.
Looking at the -3 this is seen as the distance between -1 and -2 (away from compression).  5 is the distance from -2 to 3 (compression/positive movement).  It can be seen that for high values of x this movement towards or away form compression gets very high.
We are used to thinking of the fixed value as either positive or negative controls, but that doesn't work very well with the model where there is a single positive or  negative charge for unitary objects.  If it were the measure of single objects it would require a very small deviation.
However, if what we see as positive and negative is merely the net movement towards or away from an inflection point, it can be seen it is eitehr positive or negative except at that one point.
You ask, why?
The simple answer is that the derivation of dimension is driven by the sin type equations which are, at their hear, quantum equations.  We are taught that since they are functions of y they have true curvature, but if aut teaches anything, it is that pi is fixed for any fixed amount of information and for any fixed combination of compression states.
Hence, the smooth curve of the sin equation is actually indiivdual net movements either up or down making the sin curve (by virtue of adding all of those points together at least above ct1 whcih is where we observe positive and negatives.

So I was in a discussion the other day about race and it turned to whether a writer could write from the perspective of someone of a different race legitimately.  While that is a great moral argument, in the name of meaningless arguments, I think that the argument was put to rest by Harriet Beacher Stowe with her "Uncle Tom's Cabin."
Lincoln is supposed to have said when meeting her, 'So you're the little woman who wrote the book that made this great war!.'  This says volumes about the difference that one person can make, the power of the printed word and the legitimacy of writing from the perspective of someone who is vastly different.

With that disclaimer, I want to discuss a book I'm reading and a book I've published.  The book I reading is (I'll give the name later) about the late 1800 changes in the Ottoman Empire, so far focused on the great Canal and slavery.  The violence, even after the Civil War, associated with the middle eastern Sudan slave trade, 'the old people's bones lining the slave roads, the children too young to walk tossed to the side of the roads,' and relevant to my book, the Absynnian sex slave trade. 

This is the forward of "The First Battlefield of WWII"

In a northern desert in Africa lies an oasis.  A few trees grow there, a few spiny, stunted desert plants and a well surrounded by sand in as an isolated a place as exists on dry land. 

                It could be said the first battlefield of World War II was the last battlefield of World War I.  But World war I ended. World War II must have begun afterwards and the starting place for World War II was this Oasis.

                This book is a work of fiction, but if it has a historical thesis, then the thesis of this book is this; World War II started with a battle around the time of American Thanksgiving in 1934 at the Wal Wal desert oasis.  Like the events which started WWI, the participants were quickly marginalized by subsequent events.  For a short period of time, one of the combatants on the winning side of World War I, engaged in a horrible war history largely chose to forget.

                The war began in Ethiopia, the first battlefield of World War II and the last battlefield of Africa colonialism.               

                Africa for a short time was fully colonialized and so damaged politically it never fully recovered.  The horrors of World War II resulted from collusion, tacit or otherwise, allowing the belligerents to act against a peaceful African nation, a member of the league of nations.  This is not speculation this is history.

                Little of this appears in popular history.  Most histories, at most, show one or two photographs.  These preserve none of the horrors of what would become known as the Second Absinthian war. There is little if anything about this battle resulting in World War II except in scholarly texts.

                This story is a work of fiction, but the battlefield which is described in this book existed and the battles took place, much as it is laid out.

So with that I'm going to put some chapters from my book which takes place at the time immediately after that book ends, having finished with out of doors in the holy land.

AuT-an early look at space

It is 4:00 am.  It is far after the witching hour, it is the hour of poets, the hour when those who love too deeply to sleep wander the night in search of peace only to find whatever the night holds.
In my book "Notes From Venus" I look at the problems associated with days that stretch into months on a planet (which is very close to earth in the grand scheme of things) where a year is shroter than a day due to the decreased speed of rotation.  At this time of the night, the idea of 4:00 am stretching into weeks is particularly poignant.

I'm going to discuss this initial step in going from 0 to negative and positive numbers in this post, but first a note about irony.

so i hear steven  hawkin published his first treatise on properties of an expanding universe and the server crashed.  I have said before that this work was an atttempt to reconcile a book on hologram theory by hawkin with Einstein concepts, but it has, since those humble beginnings, buried both of those earlier works beneath super symmetry concepts that render them trivial by comparison.  It doesn't make their work less relevant, it only shows that relevance is relative and that is what Einstein set out to prove in the first place.
Irony, I know more about space and the expanding universe than Hawkin and to the extent that you read this blog and my books, you do also.  And yet, he understands so much more about the ways of pre-aut physic, the practical application of the illusion, where I know more about reality.  And yet the magician Hawkin, is recognized, while the true scientist speaks to empty stadiums, I have not crashed any servers.  true genius truly lives in dark places, at 4:00AM.
It's little enough to know one day perhaps hawkin will say that perhaps he will not.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/oct/23/stephen-hawkings-expanding-universes-thesis-breaks-the-internet
If I'm right, which I am, it can be said that traditional physicists know more about what the illusion looks like, but I know where the cards are hidden during the trick.

An early look at space

           

          AuT has reached the point where space can be defined.  However, there are many alternatives in the definition.

          For purposes of this discussion, some assumptions will be made.  Those are that space can be positive, negative or neutral and can shift between these values.

          There are alternative views, but some view has to be taken in order to begin the inquiry and the existence of positive, negative and neutral features at higher concentrations makes this starting point reasonable.

          The early features of AuT are based on -1 or 0', an information based system.  which is extensively discussed in book 2.  0' evolves or "becomes durable" as solutions for space.

           We tend to look at information as bits, positive/negative, yes/no types of information.  To get to this result, AuT relies of -1^x to create both types of information.

          The first Information arms can arise from -1^x or from 2x+1 where x=either -1 or 0 creating positive and negative carriers based on 2(fx) or 2(x-1+x-2) summed over all the values of n from 0 to infinity.  Note that instead of 2(fx), fx can be defined as x+x-1+x-2 and these are past Fibonacci series values of x as opposed to 2 times x in the other part of the equation.  AuT suggests that -1^x gives rise to the type of information and the formulation of 2(fx) serves to preserve this result as compression is increased.

          The observed result is 1) information in a fluid pre-space state (ct0); information as -1^x with x=0,1: 2) information as positive, negative or neutral based on combinations of 2-4 as -1,1, or 0 preserved in information arms based on 2^1 as space; 3) a conversion of the 4 states of information to the fixed 2f(x) which can be compressed by subsequent information arms as state and proximity allow as discussed in more detail below in reference to figures 5, 7 and particularly 8.

          The exact mathematics change slightly as the value of x gets large enough to allow larger combinations.

          One critical aspect of preserved information is that it allows the value of these concrete bits of information to shift in value.  How this shift occurs is the second critical aspect of the theory.  Observation suggests that the shift occurs based on geometry, but at early values of compression, geometry is absent, so we have to rely on the equations giving rise to geometry.  The first one present, -1^x is inadequate to preserve values at longer and longer sizes based on their creation as fixed information states at larger and larger values of x making them trail behind the earlier states which have lives which are increasingly long.

There are many ways to arrive at this.  The F-series was an early choice, 2^n another, but the mathematically suggested methodology and the one adopted for this discussion is -1^x+2x(-1)^x-1.

X is the single variable but for each new ct0 created, a value of x starts as 1 for its lifespan.  In this way, we’re using this formulation for the lifespan of ct1 states as positive or negative.

1, -3, 5, -7.  When the first ct1 has a life of -3, the second has a life of 1 in the positive state.  This assumes the initial value is 0 for each information state which may or may not be the case.  At very large values of x where ct5 states are possible (our universe) the length of existence for the first information states are for our purposes nearly infinite.  Moreover, the length of higher states of compression (ct2,3,4,5) the lifespans get exponentially longer due to information arms allowing for information sharing, but they shift nevertheless, but according to F-series effects.

Figure 5

Here are the last lines from OODITHL

Dear Lord and Father of mankind, Forgive our foolish ways! Reclothe us in our rightful mind, In purer lives thy service find, In deeper reverence, praise. "O Sabbath rest by Galilee! O calm of hills above, Where Jesus knelt to share with Thee The silence of eternity Interpreted by love! "Drop thy still dews of quietness, Till all our strivings cease; Take from our souls the strain and stress, And let our ordered lives confess The beauty of Thy peace."