AuT Durabilty and curvature, reading the future and finding g-space.

I have republished book 2 which now contains most of the most uptodate information on durabilty and curvature which is repeated below.  The importance of this, other than anchoring my place as the primier physicst of all time, said in as much jest as I can modestly muster, is that it gives the specific derivation between a positive and negative (-1^x) universe to one which is based on F-series, information type compression and (by combination of 1 and 2 from different compression states) standard clock time and relativity.
Predicting the Future:
I discuss the idea that change in x, affection only ct0, is not time which is only a function where ct0 coverts to ct1.  Indeed just as information comes together to form the future, so it breaks down, creating in essence an anti-time.  For those who question how Nostradamus could predict the future, you need only understand that it is possible to tap into the anti-matter, anti-electron, anti-time, anti-history stream where combined information states forming the future act in reverse to see how this is possible.  Hence, there are two ways to see the future using AuT.  The first is to observe phenomena in line with the net compression or decompression state on a gross scale in order to predict what the universe is having us move towards.  The second is on the opposite scale where we look at the future breaking down and observe the history embodied in that stream of decaying information.
Relative Change:
The idea of relative change of one compressed state to another is where time arises as we experience it, as a '4th dimension' there being no dimension before a comparison between ct1 (space) and ct2 (photonic features) even though some form of information (ct0) existed beforehand and can be 'seen' through its effects and through the transition from -1^x to sin-type transitions and the independent f-series and 2^n simultaneous solution/compression features.
The perfect theory
Indeed, AuT was so perfect from a theoretical aspect, that before the methodology was mathematically set out, the existence of the transitions was seen allowing (1) multiple coordinates to change together, at least relative to higher states (2) for the rates of change to vary between the different ct states to allow for (a) clock time and (b) dimension and (c) time dilation which are required to have perception of the universe and a (d) framework from which separation can exist on different levels and (e) offsetting infinite expanding and infinite compressing series along with (f) a vibrational aspect dating back to the underlying -1^x "super carrier." While defined, these conceptually have been aluded to since Spirals in Amber, if not before, but to mathematically plot them is substantial if mathematically unchallenging.
You can be forgiven for not seeing the true beauty in this. However, I am putting my name in the hat for the greatest physicist ever, so you ask, "what is greater than the origin of space time and an explanation of all heretofor unknown, observed phenomena and predictability of the universe?" 

The Answer

The answer is that ct0 toct1 is a different mathematical function. Indeed ct0 is different from ct1, not having a direct connection to curvature and associated more directly with -1^x.  So?  So, It points the way towards other infinite series that function in a similar fashion (to the ct0-ct1 transition) and to a pattern that leads all the way back to g-space! Dare I say it..Of course I do. Through the pain you caused me, through your ignoring me and leaving me to go blind and starve, I have have opened a pathwall alltheway to the almighty. And, I suppose,that is still not enough for you.  Your gods forbid that I be invited to lecture, better you treat me like all the other superstitious twits in the face of truth, burn me at your metaphysical stake, it is no less than I deserve.

Getting Back to Things.
While a complete reading of books 1-4 (1,3 and 4 will need some editing to be fully compliant) and the soon to be released book amended book 4 and new book 5 is necessary to complete understanding, the primary section, previously published in this blog in unedited form is set out below as it appears now in book 2.
As mentioned, book 2 currently benefits from several upgrades, including the most recent spreadsheets, correcting the defect which was distracting because the inaccuracy raised questions about how the transition applied which are elminated by the corrected spreadsheets.

Before we get to today's post, I note.

So I'm reading 3 empires on the nile by Green which is one of those well researched works that are thoroughly enjoyable.  Having written about africa in this area, it has is very interesting and I'm think may even go into the first absynnian war which predates my book only by a little.  It is a beautiful work of historical research.  I look forward to commenting further.

Today's post:

Durability and Curvature

Durability can be shown graphically for curvature creation.

Figure 5

          Figure 5 shows the vibrational nature and the preservation of states.  This gives the impression of durability of results and also the importance of transitions between these states.  The length between 1 and -2 (CT0 Values is -3 (Transition value) (the transition direction is negative), between -2 and 3 is 5; between 3 and -4 is -7.  I.E. the distance between any state and the next higher state gives the same result as the denominator for pi which gives a ratio (for the total amount of information) between two F-series states.

          What pi reflects is -1^x+2x(-1)^x-1; which in turn reflects this transition.

          X=1=-1+2(1)(-1)^0=1

          X=2=-3

          X=3=5,etc.

          This recurring pattern defines the denominator for pi and is the base for comparison to higher states which is critical to both curvature and to compression.  It also reflects the difference between each state in the alternating positive and negative state building independent of the underlying state (ct0 value) as positive or negative and instead uses the transition direction to create positive or negative states in higher ct states.

          Figure 5 is interesting because it shows the derivation of the denominator (comparison ratio) as a function of moving towards or away from compression.

Looking at the -3 this is the distance between -1 and -2 (away from compression).  5 is the distance (transition value) from -2 to 3 (compression/positive movement).  For high values of x this movement towards or away from compression gets very high.

          We are used to thinking of the fixed value as either positive or negative controls, but that doesn't work very well with the model where there is a single positive or negative charge for unitary objects.  If it were the measure of single objects it would require a very small deviation.

          However, if what we see as positive and negative is merely the net movement towards or away from an inflection point, it can be seen it is either positive or negative except at that one point.

          You ask, why?

          The simple answer is that the derivation of dimension is driven by the sin type equations which are, at their heart, quantum equations.  We are taught that since they are functions of y they have true curvature, but if AuT teaches anything, it is that pi is fixed for any fixed amount of information and for any fixed combination of compression states.

          Hence, the smooth curve of the sin equation is individual net movements either up or down making the sin curve (by virtue of adding all of those points together at least above ct1 which is where we observe positive and negatives.

Transition to Fibonacci series

          Comparison of higher states to the ct0-ct1 comparison gives pi higher states being f-series starting with 2^(2^2)=8.

          Stability is locking something in a freezer, putting longer states together.