https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/techandscience/the-universe-should-not-actually-exist-cern-scientists-discover/ar-AAu23E9?ocid=sf
One day, you'll be explaining to someone that you followed my posts all along. They'll say, why didn' t you invite the most brillian physicist of your time to speak? I just want it on the record that I'm still looking for those invitations.
I'm not going to follow up on my last post because of an important announcement. The amended book 2, 2nd edition mod1 is going to be available tomorrow. it's probably available right now, but some of the corrected spreadsheets may bleed off the page and i need to put a correced copy up to fix that printing error. the hard copy can also be ordered.
I'm not going to follow up on my last post because of an important announcement. The amended book 2, 2nd edition mod1 is going to be available tomorrow. it's probably available right now, but some of the corrected spreadsheets may bleed off the page and i need to put a correced copy up to fix that printing error. the hard copy can also be ordered.
Filling in the gaps.
The second modification of the second edition, really a third edition, of book 2 is being published as we speak. By next week, you'll have the much updated version with the corrected spreadsheets and all of the information developed in this blog up till today. I high recommend if you have an interest in the universe, that you obtain a copy. If you purchased an old copy and bring it by my office in the next few weeks, I'll replace your copy.
The basic underlying features of both volumes are the same, but much of the detail associated with the derivation of space from pre-space phenomena and other issues such as the application of PEP in at least its first drafts are included in the new editions. It's not so much a rewrite as the middle section is updated to include the corrected spreadsheet and a few observations on the derivation of space from ct0, a pretty important aspect.
A question I am often expecting to be asked is why isn't x time? Its a good question and the general reason is that there is no "aging" as x increases. The amount of information goes up and quantum instants are defined by changes in x, but time as we recognize it does not exist without a relative change between two ct states.
I hear dumb stuff about time and entropy all the time, being surrounded by people who do not understand AuT physics (because they haven't seen it. Question like "is time smooth or quantum (obviously qunatum). The problem is people see space as smooth, which its quantum too. The see curves as quantum, same problem, they cannot see the quantum aspects so they assume they re not there, while AuT solves for them and explains how the co-exist. The fact that there is a single variable for the entire universe also is mind blowing until you think about how obvious it is.
Another one is whether time started with the big bang or even what is the big bang, both highly aggravating. Now if you said, what is the environment where x changes, what causes it to change (it doesn't necessarily change since it could be all numbers and changes free of time) and how is the algorithm created and held in place I'd say those are darn good questions. You could say they are thoughts in god's mind and in some ways you would be right no matter what the answer.
The issue of why time only goes in one direction, also irritating. X changes in one direction only to the extent that whatever value you have for x, the universe is a certain way (all of it because of the single variable issue). That keeps you from going back in time as a separate entity (although this issue is dealt with earlier since the universe could probably absorby rouge information although it would no longer be the same universe, it would also be pretty darn similar; but woudl x affect the new information or would you be stagnate in teh new universe? Probably is my answer although that's a question for another day. The fact is that time probably does goe both ways, we just don't see it that way because of our idea that the direction of information change is the same as time which it isn't. exactly. This is where the aging issue comes up. As substitutions occur without net inflection point changes, we see that as aging. Absolute velocity is, in such a case, total invlection point change for the higher state in question or light speed. This also requires more analysis than I'm willing to go into, but book 2 does discuss time dilation which is a version of this. The fact is however, that these changes which we see as disorder are only disorder while the universe is in a net expansive phase, otherwise, the amount of order is decreasing because velocity is decreasing and compression and shared state aging increases. This is worth a longer look, but not tonight.
The second modification of the second edition, really a third edition, of book 2 is being published as we speak. By next week, you'll have the much updated version with the corrected spreadsheets and all of the information developed in this blog up till today. I high recommend if you have an interest in the universe, that you obtain a copy. If you purchased an old copy and bring it by my office in the next few weeks, I'll replace your copy.
The basic underlying features of both volumes are the same, but much of the detail associated with the derivation of space from pre-space phenomena and other issues such as the application of PEP in at least its first drafts are included in the new editions. It's not so much a rewrite as the middle section is updated to include the corrected spreadsheet and a few observations on the derivation of space from ct0, a pretty important aspect.
A question I am often expecting to be asked is why isn't x time? Its a good question and the general reason is that there is no "aging" as x increases. The amount of information goes up and quantum instants are defined by changes in x, but time as we recognize it does not exist without a relative change between two ct states.
I hear dumb stuff about time and entropy all the time, being surrounded by people who do not understand AuT physics (because they haven't seen it. Question like "is time smooth or quantum (obviously qunatum). The problem is people see space as smooth, which its quantum too. The see curves as quantum, same problem, they cannot see the quantum aspects so they assume they re not there, while AuT solves for them and explains how the co-exist. The fact that there is a single variable for the entire universe also is mind blowing until you think about how obvious it is.
Another one is whether time started with the big bang or even what is the big bang, both highly aggravating. Now if you said, what is the environment where x changes, what causes it to change (it doesn't necessarily change since it could be all numbers and changes free of time) and how is the algorithm created and held in place I'd say those are darn good questions. You could say they are thoughts in god's mind and in some ways you would be right no matter what the answer.
The issue of why time only goes in one direction, also irritating. X changes in one direction only to the extent that whatever value you have for x, the universe is a certain way (all of it because of the single variable issue). That keeps you from going back in time as a separate entity (although this issue is dealt with earlier since the universe could probably absorby rouge information although it would no longer be the same universe, it would also be pretty darn similar; but woudl x affect the new information or would you be stagnate in teh new universe? Probably is my answer although that's a question for another day. The fact is that time probably does goe both ways, we just don't see it that way because of our idea that the direction of information change is the same as time which it isn't. exactly. This is where the aging issue comes up. As substitutions occur without net inflection point changes, we see that as aging. Absolute velocity is, in such a case, total invlection point change for the higher state in question or light speed. This also requires more analysis than I'm willing to go into, but book 2 does discuss time dilation which is a version of this. The fact is however, that these changes which we see as disorder are only disorder while the universe is in a net expansive phase, otherwise, the amount of order is decreasing because velocity is decreasing and compression and shared state aging increases. This is worth a longer look, but not tonight.
No comments:
Post a Comment