Pages

Sunday, October 29, 2017

TSON Chapter 3

The first edition will be sloppy, half written, but finished quickly.
I will, perhaps include this to the reader..."This work is being published in rough form for those who would be more interested in the science than the writing.  If you want to get more deeply into the mathematics, you should read the following books on this subject....I hope the second edition will be rewritten a bit more artfully."
And how like a horror story and how like a love story.  Have to be careful not to get off track

Chapter 3

“I think I am writing this only because she wants me to.”
“You have your own willpower, just stop.”
“I cannot.  I am obsessed with the ideas.”  I said this, but was it my obsession or hers?  How much was I in control...My thinking was cut off when he started speaking again.
“Your ideas,” he laughed.  “Your ideas are mathematical, those of these ancients were…occult.  The supernatural, mystical, magic.”
“That isn’t entirely true.”
“You’re saying Nostradamus claimed to base his predictions on science?”
“Not publicly.   But he hid what he was really doing.  He had travelled to Italy and had access to the works of the middle east as a result, those having been refined by Fibonacci.  But what was he really doing?  He called his form astrology, something he practiced not as the supernatural, but in the form of a series of farmer’s almanacs, very accurate ones.”
“Like Benjamin Franklin?”
“Exactly the same, although his were years in advance, his incorporated the same type of side stories, including forecasting future events.  He was very much a mathematician in this way,  calculation of the planets and stellar bodies in relationship to the earth is the same type of geometric study that Algorithm theory relies on.
“And he studied classical historians like Plutarch and Moses if you accept him as the author of the bible and Moses studied under the Egyptians who were also great astronomers of their day.  He was much closer to those sources than we can be today.  Perhaps even copies of the original works of Parmenides existed.”
“Plutarch is not Parmenides.”
“Not directly, but he was a biographer of the ancients.  Indeed, he identified himself with Plato.”
“Plato?”
“Zeno was Parmenides’ student, Socrates was Zeno’s student, Plato was Socrates’ student and Plutarch was the biographer of Plato.  And he ended his life as an Oracle at Delphi.”
“Michel de Nostradame  was born December of 1503 in the South of France.  He wrote “The Prophecies” in 1555, when he was 51 or 52 years old.  In today’s lime frame he would have been in his 70’s or 80’s.  He had early learned Latin, Greek and Hebrew which must have played an important part in his studies.”
“It seems largely irrelevant to my studies,” I replied.
“In 1538 he traveled to Italy.”
“Really, to Italy?”
“Yes, why is that so interesting to you.  He was apparently running from a ruinous accusation of heresy.  He would have never made it back were it not for the plague which largely silenced the church.”
“Nothing only Italy…is so closely connected with North Africa.  It was much more just an extension of the middle east, not separated by the suez canal, but connected both by the Mediterranean and overland routes that cut the world in half.”
“I don’t see what that has to do with your theory?”
“Well, this was hundreds of years later, during the plague years, but it was also a time of the renaissance.  Leonardo da Vinci had only died a few years before, but…”
“What?”
“The Renaissance was powered by the Arabic numbering system.  Leonardo Pisano, Leonard da Pisa, a Christian raised during the time of the Moors’ rule in Italy, brought that from middle east.  His book, “the book of the abacus” was finished in 1202, he was born around 1175 so he would only have been..27 years old.  Around then he became known as Fibonacci, a shorthand version of his name.  But his original work was updated 26 years later, he would have been 53, roughly the same age as Nostradamus when the final copy was written.”
“You used the Fibonacci series.  This Leonardo invented it?”
“No…the Arabic numbering system was invented, or at least reduced for historical purposes, by a Persian, Al-Khwarizmi, around 825. I have no idea how old he was when it was written.  The F-series…well, that seems to have been prevalent in the middle east among the mathematicians, but why, I don’t know.”
“Why is age important?”
“It’s not just…”
“What?”
“When I wrote my first version, “The Einstein Hologram Universe.”  
“Let me guess, you were 53.”
“No, 55.  And while close, it was not exact science.  Perhaps you need to reach a certain age to finish something like this.
“My work was refined in “Non-Linear Time Theory.” That title was abandoned as being confusing given an unrelated model by that name and a determination that coordinate change and not time was the key element to an NLC, Non-linear coordinate, universe.  Of course, I did not have another’s math to work from.  I was working from a place of…I’m not sure.
“The early thought was that coordinates were only results from a fixed algorithm, but I’m not sure that was what I understood back then.  I was trapped initially in space time from a more traditional stance.
“I was wrong because I thought of the universe as having a fixed amount of information.  That was because of the teachings of physics which were both certain on that issue and obviously wrong mathematically.  The problem was ‘the big bang’ which was completely misunderstood until my work redefined it.”
“But no one recognizes your work.  No, they do not, but they will.”
          AuT proves that the universe's grand design is just a very simple algorithm intertwined to the point that the windings and unwinding on quantum levels cannot be experienced except as apparent randomness.  The result is supersymmetry. 
          The algorithm governs the generation of force and there is no force in the sense that we define force that effects these changes.  
          The basic algorithms are converging infinite series matched with diverging series which cycle between net expansion and net compression both locally and for the universe.
          The differentiation equation giving rise to gravity is an equation that changes when solutions give rise to linearity and the associated features which give rise to compression and decompression to yield the various forces we experience.
          This equation starts with a non-relativistic aspect experienced as gravity when two dimensions in the form of two places interact in a ct1-ct2 matrix which exists within the solution order of ct1.  The other forces we experience are derived from this same equation. The infinite reach of gravity requires that it be a ct1 phenomenon which is a non-dimensional framework.  The same is true of photons, but these function according to ct1 exchange.
          If we have two masses far away from everything but space, then you have m1 and m2 and if they are held stationary relative to each other for a period you have a relatively simple math model.
          There is not “still, because all points will change with each change in x and for higher ct states, the replacement of ct1 states is movement although relative sharing has unexpected results, like compression and gravity. 
          In our example with two masses, each absorbs a certain amount of ct1 in order to maintain stable position to one another and to present unraveling decompression.  This absorption is both internal, sharing ct1 states between different ct2 spirals, and external, corresponding with movement relative to everything else and each other.  Some ct1 exchange is required because movement is a requirement of the algorithm.
          The relative solution order is preserved, otherwise distance changes, and gravity between two masses stays the same because of the fixed ratio of ct1 exchange (1:256).
          If other ct states are present and stable to each other, ct1 states must be absorbed in a manner to maintain a steady state. That occurs with ct4 but we are going to use two stable quantum ct4 states in space to minimize distractions and to allow us to add other ct states into the mix as we continue the discussion.  To make it even less complicated we are going to use quantum ct4 states.  It seems likely that quantum ct4 doesn't exist in a vacuum because it appears, and observations show that quantum ct4 states require a substitution rich orbit (proximate solution) of ct3 states.
          This analysis applies to ct2 states, but since those don't experience mass the same way and since it appears that they change relative to each other more immediately, that is they move relative to one another more with each change in x due to convergence (infinite converging series), you get a different approximation than with the larger mass states.  In other words, this process with ct2 states would be cleaner and would include the same perturbation that you see with the geo function based on the evolving solution of pi based curvature which is driven by the changes in the amount of information (essentially a function of, at very high values of x, very large changes in the denominator making tiny changes in the value of the geo function).
          Knowing the net effect (the gravity equation) and that the change in ct1 over a value of x (time in this case is present since we have ct4 states) is equal to the gravitational force generated.  Mathematically then
dct1/dx=m1*m2/r^2.
          The equation is using two different scales, but r is the number of ct1 states separating the two ct4 states.  The mass is proportional to (an equivalent of) the number of ct1 states making up the mass and that over a set time period these are exchanged externally at a set rate, and in particular between the two masses. 
          The reason that gravity appears to warp space time (over several values of x) is because of this feature of pulling ct1 states in from the surrounding ct1 environment to make up for those absorbed by mass as it moves.  For quantum states two masses would not change nor would the surrounding space matrix, but over a long values of x the appearance of curvature exists.

          The exchange of ct1 states where one moves from one ct4 state to another ct4 state gives rise to a different equation, the strong and weak forces, according to which lower state the substitution is affecting (ct3 or ct2 states).

No comments:

Post a Comment