A new, precise view of Dark Matter

In editing book 1, a new view of dark matter became obvious.  While discussed in depth, the last sentence of this post is perhaps the most interesting.

It is worth noting that book 7 is already available as an Amazon Unlimited book and book 1 when edited will also be provided that way.

If there is an underlying symmetry to the universe then the uncertainty principle and probability is nothing more than saying we don't have the math to work out the details.  Even people are not random in the world of super symmetry.  I am  willing to accept that when we do a test, think, or argue we are affecting different compression states of space because the underlying math says that is what we will do.  It is counter-intuitive to believe that a relatively simple algorithm could give rise to the complexity of the universe we observe, but its also predictable in concept.
The source problem is an unwillingness to look at what we know and advance it in either direction.  We know that energy and mass are interchangeable, but we incorrectly assume that space isn't.   Space becomes the particle. Waves are not particles, but there is no reason to believe they are not made of particles particularly if you allow the exchange to be free of time as we experience it.
Accepting that different dimensional states can co-exist (which we see but for some reason reject) is another step in understanding the process.   When they convert at an inflection pt they take on particle features.

The idea of force carriers (like the HB) seem to run aground on the Pauli E. Principle because how can something affect something else with a force without some thing occupying the same space, some "contact." I'm much more comfortable for now, assuming that instead of forces and fields, things act by exchanging their relative positions in terms of their underlying fundamental constituent "particles" in a dimension free environment, meaning the fundamental particles have to be informational in nature. But I will wait to see what these "force carriers" look like and what they do.

1.     Gravity and Dark Matter is also the reflection of ct1 states associating with ct1 carriers to form ct2.  As the features of space allow for photons to “move” velocity, separation, and therefore gravity all should come into existence at the ct1-ct2 interface.  This has previously been referred to as the initiation of linearity but it is also the transition from space to non-space ct1 elements.  One of the old stand-by elements of prior versions of this theory envision Gravity as being more closely tied to ct1 states building out from 1 to several, or even from ct0 (non linear information) to ct1.  While it is difficult to rule this out as a mathematical element, since without ct1 you cannot have ct2 to begin with, the studied approach indicates that information does not have spatial elements before the ct1-ct2 transition and this would mean whatever features of the model predate this transition that give rise to gravity, are not able to express themselves until dimension is added to the equation.  The idea that “dark matter” builds from space itself in the absence of the ct1-ct2 transition is thereby disquieted.  Instead Dark Matter can be viewed as areas where the net for the area is towards compression and not decompression.