Quantum Electrodynamics 2 of 3

What I have and what I don't have is of no consequence to you
The universe dictated long ago where we would be but not why.
it has to be, however unlikely, that everything happens just this way
without any randomness.
Is it possible?  It cannot be possible.   And yet the theory insists it must be the truth.
And yet the universe is impossible enough without a simple underlying basis.
Why me, what did it appear to me?  Why to anyone?
Why the durable illusion of self determination, self awareness, love?
Why not love?
What does duty mean in a universe where nothing matters.
We've always known we did not really matter.
And yet we cling to it.
You need me to release my logic
You need me to release my obligations
You need me to release love
And I don't
I have never hated you for what you did
But I have hurt from what you did
I have wandered in the rain
forgone exercise, food, sleep and peace
most of all peace
in the form of self respect
but I've rarely had anything like self respect
only conceit
And that brings me to todays post

I have boiled the logical flaw (for the moment) in QED down to 2 things in order to understand why AuT is right. 1) You have to be willing to assume, just for the sake of argument, that time is an effect of dimension and not a dimmension and 2) that the Michelson and Marely test was flawed.  That is all, once you are willing to look at things through that prism, the entire charade of QED falls apart and the more simple, but more terrifying underlying symetry is obvious.  These lead to other conclusions, compression, for example and it might be helpful to understand that all positional change is in one direction (that is you cannot go back in space to where you've been before without violating the speed of light, which is in reality just that x changes moving everything one ct1 at a time and this refutes the possibility of going back in time without refuting the universe, but that takes you a little furtheer than you need to go.
The third flaw that might be added is this: 3) The whole idea of dPdx being greater than (or equal) 2piH (P-momentum H Planck's constant) assumes incorrectly that Planck length is significant for all the features of the of the makeup of the universe which it clearly IS NOT  since space, at the very least does not have dimension necessary to make Planck length relevant.

Keep in mind that this is a discussion of a lecture and not AuT theory which is set out in the books.

QED: Interaction of PH,e-,e+
This is the interaction of these particles-which interaction is covered earlier.
The shape of things in collission (chapter 24).
The whole underlying concepts are complicated in presentation so I am only doing my best:
QED Photon propogating from one point to the next X to Y yields P((x-y)^2)

QED: electron propogating from one point to the next Electron movement forward or positron movement back in time (utter nonsense unless time is just that effect of conserving ct3 exchange (partially) within a system.

Interaction: This is discussed previously as ct1 and higher ct state exchanges in AuT since points do not become one, but here it is this idea of"
Electron emitting or absorbing a photon; which is translated, due to a misunderstanding of the relationship of photon to electron, as an electron and positron being emitted by an photon as a pair or combining to make a photon.

The final concept is charge conservation which says that an electron going into a field must yield an electron out although photons which have no charge can come and go as they please to create the field which is not entirely off, although it emits the possibility, however rare, of decompressing and compression within that system.  This last, is the base of symmetry of QED and reflects the consistency we experience only as a result of long lifespans of flpuspix states.

Electrons and photons are over-related.  Obviously in AuT a photon is a pre-wave derivative of time (ct1) and is far removed from the electron which is a unit, however unstable or stable, of ct3 sufficiently alligned in charge of its component parts so it may be involved potentially in a ct4 information arm.  Whether the opposite charge makes this possible or prevents it is a question of AuT logic that remains somewhat in doubt.  While it is considered that "pairs" form up to make information arms, it is also possible at least that like charges stay together and that pairs separate.  This is contraindicated both by logic and by the idea that compression representing the tendency of separated states to try to recombine which they cannot do fully due to the constant changes in compression state and the staggering of those states, especially in the middle of the universe where the time frames for those changes (the x-frames and not time frames actually) are so enormous allowing for the type of continuity we experience which would be absent at the edges of the universe where the changes would happen at pre-time speeds, gradually building to the even more still changes at the longest part of the universe.