Book 8 and a post closer to g-space

The next few posts will largely be related to putting up chapters in book 8 which is due to go to publication in 11 days.
Every once in a while it is a good idea to probe into g-space.
The 256:27 contains the 27 which in our math is 3^3 which suggests a relationship of -1^n and fpluspix which would be 3,9,27 and so on and which could feed any number of aspects of this early equation that occurs without direct impact on our dimension but could be a significant background feature.
Just to give an example of how this can be viewed, we will use 3 as the primary feature, but understanding that this is only a single potential feature and that 27 would make more sense, but work according to the same basic procedures.
So how would this work with fpluspix using 3:
-3,-1,1,-1;5,1,-1,1,-7... yielding (at least in this example:
-3,5,-7 as results but with background spacing (which could also be separated by increasing numbers of spaces.
The results observed indicate that most likely the -3 is generated continually at the beginning and that the other results are generated sequentially.  This suggestion is that you have -3 generating 5 which then generates -7.
This would mean that you have -3(1),-1,1,-1;-3(2),5(1);1,-1,1;-3(3),5(2),-7(1);-1,... byway of example where 5(1) results from-3(1) using the fpluspix solution.  The limit as spacing approaches 1 suggested indicates that there might be another set of numbers between -3(2) and 5(1) just by way of example.
What best generates the repetitive off set universe we observe is a determination worth exploring.
It is worth noting that obvious or at least direct effects of the intervening -1^n results are not observed in the basic math model of AuT but is suggested in the "memory" features of AuT solutions.

Time vs Change

Book 8 is a supplement to book 7 and continues a discussion of the relationship of the search for the Higgs Boson and the Standard Model of the universe with Algorithm Universe theory.  Unfortunately, as a theory, it suggests the near uselessness of colliders.

One thing that observation suggests (requires) is that time and change are different.  Time is a feature between waves and black holes

Time is the transfer of information between quantum moments in “change” using wave forms of sufficient density to carry this information.  Knowing what time is/isn't we can why it disappears at the two extremes and why there is wave particle duality.

CT3 waves and ct2 particles interact in a time free environment so they look like they exist together and not apart although they are distinct at quantum instances.  Time disappears at the free ct3 state because of the number of ct1 and 2 changes which do not carry information compared to the aligned (carrier arm alignment) ct3 states that make up ct3-4 transition states such as protons.  Likewise, at ct4, the neutron, the ct3 carriers collapse into the neutrons and at ct5 they are completely eliminated.   While important to us, this “time” is irrelevant to the operation of the universe which is a little hard to take.

Real change occurs in a time free environment that governs things on either side of time as we experience it and we use the fudge factor (the speed of light) to reconcile this initial rate change (256:27) where pre-dimensional changes convert to one dimensional ratios. 

It is logical if we exist in 3 dimensions, blackholes in 4 and waves in a pre-dimensional state that there must be 5,4,3,2,1 dimensional states and our math actually shows that in the pi-derivations of curvature (the 256:1 -256:27 actually) is derived using sine-1 and 1.  In the pre-dimensional math real super symmetry and quantum change is obvious and measurable.

There is no time in 1d or 2d, since time is a 3 dimensional phenomena; but the subsequent states of compression, yielding comparative ratios of this potential of this plus or minus, can give different relative rates of change which look like forces over a series of quantum time changes.