QED 4 of 3...what?

The circle version is used as a “small correction” of the process without the circle and the real question for mathematics, is how does this “small correction” correspond to what is actually going on here, the partial decompression of electron.

Equally important is why the electron is so durable as an element and so far the best answer to this question seems to be that it is a single information arm’s worth of information for ct4 (or at least ½-therefore charged part of one arm) and there is so much exchange due to the high level of compression and the opportunities to transfer information (and therefore history and therefore time) within that state as opposed to getting external information and substitution which internal vrs external substitution is both the time creation and the slowing down.

Getting back to the “small correction” QED, e appears on either side of the squiggle so the “order” is e^2 [the actual overall order is the place which here varies between photons (2), waves (3) with a hint of ct4 from the first information arm size attributed to electron compression.

QED looks at the one on the right and says, order of 4 because of the added before and after point of the bubble e-/e+ pair and then increases the order by two (presumably) each time a bubble is added although in this bizarre presentation presumably you could have bubbles off of bubble to change the order further.

The divergences-sum equation d^4q(1/q^2(k-q)^2 taken to this lower order apparently invalidated the “smaller than” issue.

E had to be defined.  The infinities had to be absorbed into the fields-renormalization which allowed the small correction concept to come back.  This is not fully explained at 6.

The many bubbles example.  The further from the positron, the more bubbles.  POLARIZATION OF THE VACUUME (vacuum polarization-the more distance, the lower the effect in a 1/x type curve along the positive axis) is how you can think of it.  To the extent VP is used, that is AuT, but an estimate as opposed to a quantum solution (pi and distance prevent precision in QED).

The strength of the charges is affected by the screening.

AuT is saying that these “bubbles” are instead the substitutions that take place in the solutions for the compressed state more than likely.

There is a “fine structure” A=e^2/4pi=1/137

This is given without the diagrams although you'll see a tiny version in the post showing the reorganized diagrams which is done, but not posted yet.  All things in time.

This is not over-edited, but does show where QED tries unsuccessfully, but appropriately to get to the AuT:

While you might say, shouldn't you change these from 3 of 3 to 3of 4 instead of screwing with the numbers, my response is that the 4 of 3 type reasoning is where the math goes wrong, letting a single flawed experiment, misdirect all of physics despite, as shown below, the obvious accuracy of the pre-Michelson-Marley era.

So the AuT view is that polarization of the vacuum is refreshing and is an admission that space is a thing that is the same stuff as the photon which in turn is the same stuff as the wave/electron.

This allows us to at least consider the idea that the changes (the bubbles) are the substitutions between the single electron and surrounding space instead of temporary electron/positron pairs and if those pairs actually appear, they can be explained potentially, as changes in the single electron based on the effects of these substitutions in the electrons structure over time.

That they average e- is not surprising since the alternative would be to dissolve upon association with another electron of the opposite charge (dissolve as opposed to the more semantically challenging annihilation).

So no we change the loop (in QED) to allow:

(1)  Loop is of heavier particle -muon heavier.  The so called “leptons” include electron, muon, and tau.  Photons are sensitive to – charged muons.  Interaction with photons is how they “see” muons, but there are other ways.  Lots of other particles can create this sensitivity but this can be true of the different transition states, to the extent charged.

(2)  Anomalous electron magnetic moment: V=-mm*B

          V is the electron potential.

(3)  Proportionality of mm: mm=ge/(2m)S and g is a constant “g factor” equal to 2.  Experiment gives slightly larger answer.  The reason seems to be changes between the two particles coming together in advance of the collision giving rise to the squiggle/photon in the Feynman diagram.

(4)  Quantitative theory of electrons and photons

g-2/2=A/2pi (alpha) – first example

This evolved as -.328…(A/pi)^2; 1.181…(A/pi)^3; -1.9106(A/pi)^4;9.16(A/pi)^5 (12672 diagrams leave to this) noting it is going between positive and negative…?  These are moving from .0116 to .0011596…

Other quantum effects need to be taken into account to get to .0011596… experiments seem to meet.

Higher order corrections involve more loops.  In AuT the analogous idea is to predict more of the sub-ct3-ct4 state solutions.  The number of diagrams necessary to do the prediction is 12,672 to improve the predictability over 5 loops and 891 at 4 loops.  While the number of substitutions in AuT might be greater, the overall solution should be possible with far more simplicity.

This is from the 7th book on Algorithm Universe Theory.  More available in the 6 books already available on Amazon.