In the beginning there a was a great void, which was hot and dense being filled with everything that would ever happen.
Then there was light which was the beginning of time. In a logical progression everything that was already there is a three dimensional framework moving outward from a central location was provided a surface on which to be displayed which was time.
This is the explanation of why time fits so poorly with the other dimensions. It is because the other dimensions are painted, or etched onto time.
Time expands in only one direction which explains why the universe where everything had already happened had to begin expanding.
Obviously on some level things may go in either direction and time is a fairly constant surface on which to paint events which have already happened so that at any given moment in time, everything is painted at once...or etched. Everything is actually etched. You etch in time, you don't paint in time.
Time need only move at one speed, probably the speed of light, as the universe gets bigger. Sometimes we feel like time is expanding faster or slower, but it is only a layer of material, an intangible material which we cannot feel and we cannot see but which may be the only material of relevance to someone watching the process of taking everything that has happened being etched onto the fabric of space and time...but it isn't etched on space, space is just something that is defined by things and things are etched only on time, there is no other surface.
The only question is how many times there are, how many universal fabrics. Each would recieve everything that has already happened and everything that will happen.
If Einstein were here would he still say that time exists so that everything doesn't happen at once or would he instead say that everything has already happened and that time is a surface on which it is displayed in a linear fashion?
No comments:
Post a Comment