Can time be used to make a weapon? Can time be used to make an anti-gravity device?
If, as I posit, the universe is projected onto time and if time is a dimension which is not at all "timelike" but is instead dimensional in G-Space where there are no dimensions, everything dimension there being a signularity and if the so called "big bang" is actually the separation of time from the rest of the sigularity and if as I further posit this "bang" was mostly an "anti-gravity"event so that gravity is nothing more than a defect in time which is entirely consistent with the model that it is a dimple in the universe; the difference being that instead of a dimple in "space" it is a dimple in "time" on which space is projected from the signularity that is the G-Space where everything happens at once.
Weaponizing and anti-gravity devices will have to wait for a separate blog which will be both obvious in retrospect and unsatisfying. For now, let us look a little closer at this whole idea of gravity as part of the projection of the universe on time to lay the groundwork.
When you look at traditional views of gravity, the dramatization is of a sphere sitting in a dimple in space. Obviously that is just a two dimensional tool, but it works much better if you think of it as a projection over time.
If we are "really" going to design an anti-gravity weapon/device we can start with Einstein's gravity which is due to the "curvature of spacetime" which yields the image of the earth sitting in a pool of space. The only difference is that we can ignore the space part because space in hologram projection on time universe is irrelevant, since it is just an image, instead it is just an "image" burned (or etched) into time. The same curvature rules might be applicable, but only because of the importance of time in the observation of distance.
Put another way, if you were to curve space you would have a lot more trouble and you end up with this troubling image of a ball falling into this gravity well. But if mass is actually pulling time back into its place in the sigularity, you answer a lot of questions. But since it is all just a projection, you can get even closer because mass isn't pulling time back, time's going back on its on where there's a big lump of something happening solid in the projection.
First, the black hole issue, you've pulled time all the way back or at least so close that it doesn't matter to us in our universe.
Ask me how you can scatter black holes all over the universe and still have a singularity? That's an easy question to answer if you think about it, follow along.
Likewise if you project a mass onto time and it doesn't get you very close, what is actually happening is that you are pulling everything from the projection back to the singularity, you just don't have enough mass to pull time back completely.
Space time is not really affected in this model, just time. Time is the surface on which the singularity G-space is projected since somehow time came-a-loose from the singularity and everything is getting projected on it. How did time come-a-loose? Simple and now we're getting close to the weapon, the big bang, a massive un-gravity event. Now space wants to get back to where it started in the singularity but everything that is projected onto it (remember it is etched into it so we get this great 3-d effect, 4-d if we include time) is going to pull it back to the singularity and just to give a partial hit to the scattered black hole issue, all those black holes back to the signularity get to the same spot (really less than a spot) because time is just a projection because it's the only part of the solid universe that escaped and it gives the impression that the singularity has dimension. You cannot travel along anything without time. Think about it, how am i going to travel along a ruler if I don't take time to travel from inch one to inch two?
That's a lot for now, more later, but for those of you who want a little formula with the words, think of this. Acceleration (newtonian, not einsteinian) approximate as meters/sec^2. Put another way you go so many meters/sec per second faster. Time therefore is the key to movement along gravity just like it is the key to movement along a line, through space, etc.
As time goes back to the singularity, i.e. to zero, the solution of gravitational acceleration goes to the infinite (division by zero). Hence the reason things get so unreasonable as you fall into a black hole. Gravity is a function of mass and the distance between mass, but that is irrelevant in the hologram universe where mass is merely projected onto time. Instead, the question is how fast is time growing or shrinking. If time shrinks (heavy objects pulling it back to the singularity is the einstein 'backwards' model) then the image "acts" heavier", the denominator is going to zero, time goes to zero, gravity goes up. As time expands the object gets lighter.
We've already proved that time has some peculiar qualities because a fast object experiences time slower (i.e. an item projected move quickly over time doesn't age as fast as an object projected slowly over time) but this model has to do with how the denominator is affected in gravity. You go closer to time at zero, you get heavier and closer to the singularity where time becomes a part of the singularity and the denominator is zero (no time as we know it, just the singularity where everything happens at once).
Anyway, don't want to describe the weapon here, anti-gravity, out of time and we're too darned close to time coming loose again, and we have to save something for later. Next post: All the black holes go to the same place; how does time go to zero and back; how are things projected onto time from a singularity and what does that have to do with gravity; how do we use all of that...in 15 words or less. (just kidding).
No comments:
Post a Comment