Ok, the smoke analogy may have been a little confusing. Obviously when you burn the extra dimension in god's space you get matter like what we have and time just like you get carbon dioxide and water when you burn wood.
The references to god, by the way, are just to differentiate the two types of space. It doesn't matter if god generated our space or it some other thing generated it, somehow we ended up with matter that we recognize and we're only able to recognize it because there is time also.
In this theoretical discussion, the space we attribute to god is not much different from our space other than the fact that there is no time, mass and energy are the same, and it has quantum characteristics which make it like a single piece, a singularity by our definition, but only because we are obsessed with time and the distance it gives rise to. In G-space you can get from one spot to another instantly because all the spots are the same so to speak. This will get confusing as you read further, but we'll address that confusion in a latter blog.
Now I'm going to tell you have to stand up and look god in the eye and most of you physists (and anyone else who reads a paper) know where this is going. Note that god only has one eye, because everything in G-space is not separated by time and therefore not separated by distance. Again, this will give rise to some confusion as you read on, but the answer will be saved for a later paper.
For everyone else, you'll get there quick enough. In the process there will be an unsatisfying explanation of the unified field theory.
To understand this, you'll have to give up distance. Time is what matters, distance is just a by-product. When you get rid of time, you get rid of distance, you'll see a little of the math behind this.
Don't get me wrong about distance. When you're separated from the one you love by say 150 miles, it looks like enterity. But it's the "time" you spend apart or the "time" it takes to cross the distance that is the real problem. In God's universe you don't have this problem.
God's universe is an incredibly dense quantum space where there is no distance or time. If you have to look at string theory to be happy, imagine all the distance is balled up into a singularity, but I'm getting way ahead of myself and giving everything away. I might as well stop writing.
Anyway, it takes a different kind of energy than we're used to in order to burn G-space and G-space is going to want to get back to being G-space, it being very uncomfortable going from G-space without time to our space (o-space) where that pesky time is just everywhere. This is nothing more than O-space turning back into G-space. It absorbs time, of course, otherwise there would be no other way to get there. This is why when one object goes faster than another you have time issues, it's because you're changing the way that time is being burned and/or the way it turns back. We'll go over some gravitational equations later to get there.
If we accept that O-space wants to turn back into G-space then Gravity would be the absorbtion of time in some fashion or another.
Now, we have all the pieces to see how G-space is converted to O-space (or T-space if you prefer..t for time) and that it makes matter convertible to energy and we have the pieces to convert it back thereby explaining in an unsatisfactory way what gravity has to do with all of this. Creating time creates energy, light is energy so when you go from G-space to O-space or back again, you are also making gravity. The big bang might be referred to as the act of dispursing all of that gravity at one time and when matter starts back towards its natural state as g-space, it absorbs that gravity back into the same dimension you burned to get time. You'll see in a minute if you didn't pick it up already.
And for those of you who haven't figured it out already, you can burn this extra dimension if you can find it and have anti-gravity. We'll find it a little further down the page.
So, if you want to look at this incredibly dense G-space, i.e. you're ready to stand up and spit in god's eye, you need a place where there is less time, preferably no time; a place where you have incredible density of "our matter-God's matter separated from time). Keep in mind that the absorbtion of time in this theoretical model is what gravity amounts to whether it's a tendency or the actual absorbtion. And remember that the "absorbtion is just the conversion from O-space back to G-space which is why you need matter to have gravity (or time) because time and gravity are just a "burned" element of G-space if you like.
And for those of you who don't like this, you'll like even less that if you were able to get past the universe without screwing everything up, you'd find yourself back at the singularity of G-space. This doesn't work out very well from my perspective since the universe is expanding, but that's just time bleeding all over the place, not real expansion.
Anyway, you need something that shows this happening or it's pure speculation and you need to be able to find all the math on that somewhere, at least as much of the math as you can get and it's all there already.
And of course, the place where you can find all of this in O-spaceis a black hole or a singularity, all pretty well defined by our math. You have a lot of gravity (time absorbtion), you have a lot density (matter compressed into a tiny space) and you have an incredible stretching out of time as you fall into a black hole thereby indicating that time is just ceasing to be all that important.
Worse still, when a black hole collapses, it doesn't leave the universe, does it? Nope, it just turns back into G-space where it started. Want to open up a black hole and see what's inside? Just walk outside and look around. You open it up, you get matter and time.
Now, I know what you other non-math people are thinking, "if the math is all over the place for this where is it."
SR=2Gm/c^2 which is a lot like our energy mass conversion (and it should not be a surprise since we're going to a place where you don't have energy and mass converting so you should have an equation that takes you backwards, right?
This is the equation for Schwarzschild's radius (the event horizon for a black hole where light doesn't escape).
G=gravitational constant, m is our buddy mass and c^2 is the speed of light squared which is time.
Let's put our equations together for a second:
Sr/2=gm/c^2 e=m*c^2 so.....sr/2=gm*e/m. In other words, we still have that pesky energy hanging around, but we're able to look at this and get rid of the speed of light, i.e. time. We're not bothered by having energy since in G-space there is no difference between m and energy, e=m.
I stand to be corrected, but I think this helps a little to understand why the curvature of spacetime in a black hole is zero. If you use our math (you're still stuck with time) you end up with nothing there.
However, if you use god's math, you still have plenty of mass, only time goes to zero (or goes back to whatever it was, presumably a dimension that we don't experience except when it is burning). This explains why you can have this huge gravity field and still no matter in terms of our universe, because the time is converted back to G-space.
It's a little unsatisfying, like I said. More on this latter.
No comments:
Post a Comment