A love letter to a history major:
Now, anyone reading my observations on the hologram universe probably realizes that I am a hopeless romantic. So here is a love letter to a history major, but you may have to read between the lines if you're not tuned to that kind of thing.
Lots of people question everything that is being written here. If time is a wave, then it should be measurable. In answer to the question of measuring time (other than with a watch) we can look towards the relationship between time and the "real" or "historical" world.
We are familiar with the use of time (m/s) where we deal with the distance that one travels over a given period of time (speed). Time is therefore a function of distance.
We are also familiar with the conversion of mass and energy (e=mc^2) so we know that time is a function of mass and distance. (energy is equal to mass times the speed of light (distance/time=299792458 meters/second if it is relevant to anything)
While time may be a function of something besides mass and distance, those are things which we don't have much use for on a day to day basis because the universe is nothing but mass (stuff) and distance (space). Now I know you are all saying: "It is more than mass and distance because there is energy too." This is true, but energy is the application of time to mass and distance, just like speed is the application of time to distance and it accomplishes very little in this discussion to break mass and distance into their component parts or counterparts).
If we accept that time is the material on which our universe is projected (etched and you'll see the reason for etching later too), and you'll see a slightly different slant to this later, then it is the only true "solid" in the bunch, everything else being merely displayed on time as it rolls through everything that has already happened.
Without understanding completely what distance is or what mass is, we can know that if we have mass and we have distance we also have time embodied in them. Likewise, if we have no mass, but only distance we only have part of time and if we have mass but no distance we do not have all of time.
We know that as one mass moves along a given distance at a speed greater than another mass going over the same distance the time of the faster mass is reduced. Another way of saying this is that the greater the distance, the less time is used by a given mass. This is the "negative" time discussed earlier.
Hence, time may be seen as something which moves inversely to our way of thinking or time may be the reflection of soemthing which moves conversely. Put another way, if a mass moves over a given distance faster, it is not using less time, instead it is using more emit (the opposite-in spelling anyway- of time).
Hence, if object A is going near the speed of light, it has a great deal more emit than object B which is more nearly stationary. In such as case, Time is reduced because it is but a reflection of emit. Remember that we are dealing with a hologram of reality etched into time instead of reality itself which doesn't require time to exist and is relatively boring, there being no excitement because everything has already happened.
Because object A has a lot of EMIT, it needs less time to exist on the wave of time than does object B which has a lot less.
The speed of light is relevant to the interaction of mass and distance (or mass and space or matter and space) because the measurement of mass and energy interact according to distance and time based on the speed of light, our old friend e=mc^2. Hence the reason to think that time is somehow limited by the speed of light or at least related to it which is the question that started me down this path of explanation or nonsense depending on your point of reference. Since we can slow down time by increasing the distance covered for one object relative to another or increase the time of the still object if that is the case (depending on whether we are deailing with time or emit) we know that there is an uncertain measurement of time in our universe but that the measurement is directly related to distance and mass and hence the existence of distance and mass (i.e. the holographic universe) ceases to exist without time and likewise it is suggested that time doesn't exist without mass and distance. Hence if a tree falls in a forest and there is neither mass nor distance, it hasn't fallen at all and therefore there is nothing to hear.
Another question is whether by speeding up a mass over a given distance are we converting the mass and distance into time (or emit) so that if we freeze mass and distance are we able to convert time (or emit) into mass and distance.
Put another way, what we really have is just history (everything that has already happened at once) and that when time is applied to history what we generate is mass and distance (and energy). What we refer to as "the big bang" is therefore just the application of time to history. When time is applied to history, you get mass and distance out of history, hence we get dimension out of the application of time which is why I use the word etch instead of paint, to give that feeling of dimension. Remember, I can't explain everything at once even though, I suppose, I have if any of this makes sense.
Anyway...
Hence, the study of history is the study of applied physics and mathematics to the practical universe. Now if that is not love, tell me what is?
It is important to note that this jives very well with quantum theory discussed earlier allowing for changes to the entire universe based on a single change in one spot. The reason is that the real, non-reflected uinverse where everything has happened at once doesn't have distance. Distance (and mass) is the application of time to the "real universe" which I should just call "history" since "real and holographic" don't have much meaning. This is logically easy to accept since once history is established, it doesn't have mass or distance, is is just something that has or will happen or that is happening now.
On the physical side, for those of you scratching your heads, you've already had sex every time you'll ever have it. If there are multiple "waves" of time, you will have the same sex over and over again until the last wave passes. If there are multiple universes, then potentially every wave of time that passes through history changes it in some fashion. Likewise, there is a reason why all time waves must start at a singularity but those are topics for a later discussion.
No comments:
Post a Comment