Destroying the Universe-weaponizing non-linear time theory part quatre

quantum gravity and non-linear time theory-part 1 of part quatre
What lies behind us
Integration of time

The closest theory so far to non-linear time theory is probably quantum gravity.  It is almost certain that one day quantum gravity theorists will adopt quantum time and then they'll claim the theory for themselves.  Until then, however, it's mine.  But quantum time plus gravity being the tendency of time to become non-linear necessarily implies quantum gravity.
Somehow we have to find curved space from quantum time and the tendency of time to recoil being defined by gravity, the creator of curved space.  The good news is that this is not far fetched; in fact it is suggested by time unwinding as opposed to otherwise becoming linear.  The fact that time can rewind also suggests curvature.
Another indicator has to do with the circular nature of creation.  The sad part of non-linear-time theory is that it leaves the safety of predestination as only a possibility and far from a necessity.
But for the moment, let's take a look at the integration of time post non-linear time.  Obviously, from our "perspective" we see time as linear.  The question of what is "behind us" is answered in both hologram and non-linear time theory in much the same way, but non-linear time theory allows for time to be burned which is possible in hologram theory with a few adjustments.  The burning of time is the change in coordinates keeping in mind there are dimensional and clock time coordinates, but they are conserved in terms of changing "once time becomes linear".  Before time becomes linear, at least according to Einstein, the coordinates are all stuffed together.  If everything is predestined, then the possible changes in coordinates are pre-ordained, but even if they are not, on a fundamental level you get much the same result (a-la the Foundation Series by Asimov) but that's not important since we have shown the ability to recoil time according to, at least perceived, independent action.
Integration, however, is the subject at hand here.  Since I don't want to call up the right keyboard, I'm going to just use I for integration and you'll have to make the best of it.
There are too many ways to "skin this cat" for a single entry, so we'll just tackle a couple:
I(0-i)(any equation you want)dt + I(0-(-i)(any equation you want)dt to take into account matter and anti-matter where i=infinity and zero is the point where time becomes non-linear.
Note this misleadingly simple equation allows you to zero out matter and anti-matter and otherwise the additive feature is unnecessary.
You'll note I say "any equation you want) and the reason is that time is a part of every equation so you actually have to solve the equation for time to integrate it.  To do this let's look at two examples:
1) an "inert" mass of one neutron
2) a photon of light
While these are different to Newtonian mathematicians, they are interconvertible and therefore the same to Relativistic mathematicians according to the formula for energy to mass conversion.
Both, therefore, have a speed component and both therefore have a time component as we recognize them pre-non-linear-time theory.
The added "dimension" of dimension under Non-linear time theory (same as E-H-T of course since one is the derivative of the other) is that the very dimensions of these are changing according to time for them to appear linear (otherwise, they become temporary black holes or permanent black holes and drop out of space from our perspective although they are still time and therefore still together in the singularity where we appear projected from by the change of coordinates).
Where you're getting lost in this, if you're lost, is that you are trying to force all of the dimensional time coordinates into the clock time coordinates.  As we continue we'll ultimately have to distinguish these, but in the examples give you actually have two different ways in which time is linear.
For the photon, clock time is zero (or near enough not to matter) for the quantum time involved at light speeds.  For the neutron, clock time is just clock time except to the extent it is being accelerated towards become energetic.  If we accept it as being "essentially" still in space, it has more or less balanced clock and locational coordinate change.  What we know for sure is that if we took a fundamental part of either then then the total amount of change of coordinates for either is the same and way that they change not only define where they are, but what they are (inert mass or photon in this case).
That we are able to recoil time, albeit it comes back in the same place, same locational coordinates...or does it?  That will have to wait for the detailed discussion of the relationship between quantum time and quantum gravity (which is, of course, the tendency of quantum time to go non-linear).