no boundry theory vs e-hologram/non-linear time singularity vs the steady state universe

The problem that E-H theory has with NB theory is fact that we see the singularity in E-H theory (at permanent and temporary black holes) so that it not only is a starting point, but continues to be a relevant, dynamic part of the universe. 
The "bang" singularity is missing in both to some extent.  There is an explosive beginning in EH-Theory, but it is a time based, not a singularity/energy based explosion.  It is caused by all time becoming linear as opposed to the "everything happening at once without dimension or linearity envisioned (albeit indirectly) by Einstein.  
Beginnings in Non-Linear time theory vs constant state universes are significantly different but share a certain circularity.  In N-L-T theory, you do have a big bang.  Time goes linear at plank lengths, all of space exists at this point and much of space is converted to energy much as matter will soon be formed from the concentration of energy, everything is at planck length, and the tremendous forces that have suddenly come into existence are about to explode forth into the universe as we experience it.
Traditional physics fails in this analysis by stating that "the limits of physics" are exceeded at a black hole.  This is because dimension decrease below Planck length.  Non-linear time theory allows that below the planck length dimension merely gives way to non-linear time allowing for a continuation of physics past the plank length.  There is no loss of four dimensional space in this theory, because it proves that four dimensional space doesn't exist except as a function of time.