One thing about theories is that if we cling to them too tightly, we cease to be able to advance. Hence while I cling to the things that allow me to get up in the morning, I don't expect the same things from you.
As you will recall, in the last post we were spirally down into a black hole without loosing our gravity. Therefore all of time was not going non-linear since we still had dimensional changes as the black hole moved through the universe devouring everything in its path which is a very linear thing to do but our raft of General Relativity had sprung a leak and we were bailing out equations as we dropped into a singularity which had no dimension but still had coordinate changes.
Ahhhh-Ha! We have now defined what we're looking at here. We have lost dimension, but time still exists. The exact opposite of what we see when we approach the speed of light (where energy exists but not matter) where we have dimensional changes but no clock time. This is exactly what we would expect to happen based on NLT's definition of the conservation of dimensional change which is predicted, at least to this point, by general relativity (time slows down as you accelerate toward the speed of light, i.e. as matter becomes energy). Based on conservation theory dimensional change must be happening very fast indeed. I.e. as predicted by GR space must accelerate towards the speed of light..but only GR says it must break its own rules as change faster than the speed of light is occurring. This is where GR cheats by keeping light at the same speed but accelerating the movement of space, the same thing that is done in GR for the creation of space between light sources to get the same effect. Again, since Einstein is the source from which springs GR and NLT theories we don't have to step on any toes except our own, or more specifically Einstein steps on his own toes, but hologram theorists have run over Zeno without even slowing down to say "thank you" so this isn't a problem for physicists.
One of many options in NLT is that instead of conservation only between ct1 and dimension, at this point we can also start to have conservation between the ct1 and dimension coordinate pair and ct2 (see the prior post) which can, of course, be a part of ct1. Since we perceive ct2 poorly (see prior entries for why), if at all, this allows for the features of black holes we see while they are not "totally" non-linear. They are non-linear for coordinate change that creates dimension, but they continue to show coordinate change for movement relative to the rest of the universe. Clock time is doing something very strange indeed. Movement at the speed of light (falling into the singularity) says it should be going to zero for all the particles, but coordinate change continues since we (1) are accelerating at the speed of light inward and (2) we change position relative to the rest of the universe. If there is to be conservation, one might expect item 2 to increase, that is for the entire black hole to start to move faster, but it does not. Where is the additional change going? The most simple answer according to this very limited analysis of the theory, is that it goes to clock time 2 which is merely the rate change clock for changing coordinates for clock time 1 and dimension. That is, clock time 2 becomes (or is all along) the rate clock for the conservation of change between clock time and coordinate change. Before you get too confused, remember that all coordinates in a conservation group are rate clocks for one another to some extent. And by the time we are through with this series, you will see that I have once again pulled the proverbial rug out from under the multidimensional string hologramists who are currently rubbing their hands in anticipation of me allowing in unseen dimensions, but not yet I warn.
Now at this point half of you should be closing out this blog for good, half of you should be saying, "yes but until you build a transporter and beam yourself to switzerland you don't get a nobel prize and yet another half of you are waiting to see what comes next; and you'll note that out of the three halves, only one is doing what it should do; but there is more!
The only problem is that you'll have to wait for the next post (3) on this to see it.
No comments:
Post a Comment