One question is whether the mastery of time would allow us to live forever. If the theories of thought giving rise to time are correct, then the answer is that it already does to the extent that time exists now, but it doesn't answer questions about what would happen after time if there was an after time. This part of the theory presumes that all thought exists at once in the singularity (past, present and future thought) and would imply (much like many religions suggest) that we are a part of "god" or the overall consciousness made possible by an existence without time or dimension in linear form (that is all intelligence concentrated in one place. While some are thinking (incorrectly) that I am waxing religious, nothing could be further from the case. This is Einstein's unrecognized concept; that is he had it but failed to comprehend (at least in writing) its scope because he was stuck in "space time" and had failed to incorporate Zeno's concept that space time (Zeno didn't call it that) is only an illusion.
Strangely, this gives meaning to the quote from Descartes (Properly in Latin in the second edition-Cogito ergo sum) "I think therefore I am" since in Einstein's formulation, if the group intelligence did not think, none of us would be. It does not, however, hold that this is a fundamental foundation for developing other knowledge because "thought" can be pre-programmed and according to Einstein's undeveloped conceptual framework and in this case it would mean, "I think therefore I think I think."
If you look at things like the "pro-life question" this is an important consideration, because you cannot "protect" a life because all life that has, is or will exist is already a part of the formulation. This is one of the reasons why I feel that reliance on this theory for any proposition might be misplaced. There is enough life for the universe to exist, so the need to protect it makes little sense; and instead the concentration would on how to think best to support your place in time and more importantly how to act best given the fact that you can act fearlessly knowing you are reading from a script. This is E-H-T but not necessarily NLT. NLT is friendlier to time as an opportunity as opposed to merely the linear play of non-linear time. That is in NLT, either is equally possible and equally probable.
For those who have read my essays of current, short term and long term intelligence (Published in more detail in "China's weaponized economy") you know that I spend a lot of time thinking about the future and worrying about how poorly we approach it. You do see some of the ideas being applied (not because of me, but perhaps in spite of me) in England where they are looking at the consequences of social welfare and applying logic along with compassion to make sure that a trap is not formed by what would otherwise be a purely good thing. They have discovered through looking a little further into the future (longer term intelligence) that just doing compassion is not enough. You have to look at the results of compassion and you have to take into account human nature and opportunism that arises (falsely) if you think you can do better by "not working" than you can by working. But I digress.
One of the main reasons I have work so deeply with time is that to the extent we want to live within o-space, that part of the universe where we live and work, we must be able to more fully manipulate space (matter and energy included) which means we must study and even control time.
I don't think that coiling time back is outside of our capability, but even without manipulating time in the past, we should be able to solve equations using time and control space and distance by changing the time coordinates.
That being said, I have mentioned much about it in past blogs and suggest that much of this will be summarized in volume II of "The Einstein Hologram Universe" out soon (keep an eye out on Amazon) which will probably be called Non Linear Time Theory and the E-H-U.
More importantly, if we want to live we need to think past the earth. Some say there is a 20% chance life will be wiped out, at least human or technological human life, in the next 1000 years which suggests (even if not proven by statistics) that there is a 100% chance it will be wiped out in 5000 years. We'll be dead (from this place anyway) by then anyway, but we live on in the genes of our families and bacteria as it were and a complete understanding of time will be necessary to making sure that whenever the earth stops being a life raft, that there is a shore for some of that material to crawl up on.
Recycled time-intelligence is another reason to worry about the future. This is what is spoken on as re-incarnation in non-physics based philosophies but is supportable using pure physics and e-h-u theory. This is for a future blog and so we will continue this discussion at a later time.
And what would life be like or worth if I lived it forever without you?
No comments:
Post a Comment