If time is created through the destruction of matter (energy and even space) in black holes then we should be able to use statistics and the best information available to see if enough energy is converted to non-linear time in black holes to account for the amount of space being created.
In prior entries it was estimated that much energy would escape from black holes due to the conversion from matter to energy and then to increasingly higher energies (and even space now, but not earlier) as the time was increasingly less linear and this was then observed in black holes which eject large quantities (as much as 90% if memory serves) of the matter ingested. Some energy, however, is likely to go non-linear although as shown, the process is a strange one (see the discussions of the equations 1/(1-x) as x approaches 1.
To solve the question of how much space is being created we need to determine how many black holes there are, how much matter comes out of each, what the average absorption rate of matter, energy and ultimately space and what the average efficiency of the absorption is.
In prior entries it was estimated that much energy would escape from black holes due to the conversion from matter to energy and then to increasingly higher energies (and even space now, but not earlier) as the time was increasingly less linear and this was then observed in black holes which eject large quantities (as much as 90% if memory serves) of the matter ingested. Some energy, however, is likely to go non-linear although as shown, the process is a strange one (see the discussions of the equations 1/(1-x) as x approaches 1.
To solve the question of how much space is being created we need to determine how many black holes there are, how much matter comes out of each, what the average absorption rate of matter, energy and ultimately space and what the average efficiency of the absorption is.
This is complicated by the different sizes of black holes, but absorption quantities are as much a question of nearby matter as anything else and we can also look at the amount of space being created and work backwards to see if we're even in the same ball park and, of course, right now we are limited to a "factor" of the speed of light squared as the theoretical conversion rate of energy to space to mirror the conversion rate of energy to matter which is a poorly conceptualized number, although the conversion seems right and it does arise from a basis in theory that follows a type of logic (you'll have to look at the prior discussions to get more detail).
Some Pirated "facts":
Stellar-mass black holes (that is the permanent large ones as opposed to the tiny temporary ones) form from the most massive stars when their lives end in supernova explosions typically. The Milky Way galaxy contains some 100 billion stars. Roughly one out of every thousand stars that form is massive enough to become a black hole. Therefore, our galaxy may, over time, harbor some 100 million stellar-mass black holes. Most of these are invisible to us, and only about a dozen have been identified. The nearest one is some 1,600 lightyears from Earth. In the region of the Universe visible from Earth, there are perhaps 100 billion galaxies. Each one has about 100 million stellar-mass black holes. And somewhere out there, a new stellar-mass black hole is born in a supernova every second.
Supermassive black holes are a million to a billion times more massive than our Sun and are found in the centers of galaxies, presumably all galaxies. So in our region of the Universe, there are some 100 billion supermassive black holes. The nearest one resides in the center of our Milky Way galaxy, 28 thousand lightyears away. The most distant we know of lives in a quasar galaxy billions of light years away.
Only a fraction of these have been studied for "consumption" (of matter/energy/space) so we'd be working with some really, really rough numbers, but we did, earlier in this (and in the E-Hologram Universe first edition book) use this to determine how much intelligence existed (past present future) throughout the universe and similar statistical analysis should be possible, so stay tuned.
No comments:
Post a Comment