The electron and time

It is 5:00 in the morning.  I wrote this post late last night.
There  is a madness about me.
Uncomfortable.
It is no small wonder I swim so hard
Only in that expenditure of energy
suspended sans weight, sound and sight
do i find a moments peace
but it costs a lot in terms of energy
there were weeks last summer where every day i swam
until the muscles would no longer loosen up
all to put off the madness
You have the luxury to stop reading
To never deal with me again
I do not.
And that brings me to this post.  Finished in darkness and now edited in darkness. For I did not dare to post it last night because I needed to think about it and what it suggested and what it might mean.
When you read it, remember that it is written by someone who is at least half mad.  It may be your fault. Also remember that I did not invent pi, it exists alone.  I did not develop the conversion equations for mass and matter or make the observations for minimum size black holes, nor the big bang, nor make observations of time and space that support so fully logic of AuT.
I did not go looking for a definition of time so much as one found me.
And so here is another look at the electron in a way that also looks at time.

If AuT has shown anything other than the fact that i am a genius (or a moron) it is that things are not what they seem.
You think you know me, but have no idea what I am.
And perhaps you do not know space and time
Though you think you do.

Space is dimensionless though we think its in 3 dimensions and even see it that way, but it is a dimensional chimera, when we try to grasp it, it slips through our fingers.  However, in the last few years, AuT has shown that it has structure.

AuT has shown other things.
Photons are compressed space.  The  big bang wasn't.
And electrons may not be electrons at all.

Looking at the electron through the lens of AuT raises a number of questions.
There was one which led to this post.  The way I originally phrased it was as follows: "Perhaps the most pressing one is "what is the role of electrons in the transfer of intermediate history carrying ct states."  This is important because one of two things appears to be the case: 1) electrons are critical to the transfer of ct3 states or 2) electrons result from the exchange of the intermediate history carrying ct states.

The answer that is suggested is that electrons are not a thing at all.  Instead electrons reflect the ct3 exchanges between ct4ish protons and the rest of the universe.  This raises some obvious questions that I will get to in due course, the most obvious is "what about neutrons, the stable form of ct4?  It is worth considering because it suggests that time as we know it doesn't exist for the neutron.  This, frighteningly, is not inconsistent with gravitational time dilation.

Indeed, the idea that time as we experience it only exists within the narrow range of ct3-ct4 transitions is hardly mind bending once you accept the basic premise of AuT. Time is affected by increased ct1 substitutions (velocity) and by gravity which seems to eliminate some forms of ct3 substitution, but which ones?   The electron becomes a candidate.

Enough of the talking around the subject, what does "the electron" become in this scenario?
One suggestion is that there is no "electron"as such.  The phenomena we observe as the electron is the proton dealing with ct3 exchanges, radiating and receiving packets of information from the surrounding environment, packets of ct3, packets of time.

There are numerous issues and tests that are suggested.  Is a proton separated from electron clouds free of time?  Gravitational time dilation suggests the answer is yes. If a proton is stripped of electron clouds and put into an environment with time, will it spontaneously generate an electron (time exchange) field?   The answer should be yes, but what does it mean if it doesn't?  Can we really do a test which is clean enough to do this where the other features of acceleration and ambient states are absent?  Is it any crazier to look at the electron as something which is entirely different while it still has mass?  How do we deal with the mass aspects of electrons?  If electrons have mass and history is embodied in the electron exchange, does history have mass?

I went on and on all night asking these questions and looking for answers where none were to be found, looking for answers for my life where none were to be found, looking for you and knowing I would not find you.

I cannot answer many of those questions, but Einstein and others proved that mass and energy interchanged, that the two slot test for electrons yielded a wave dispersion and not a particle one.

The whole charge issue remains one which bothers me.  Even accepting all the change, why would bundles of ct3, time or not, appear oppositely charged?  An unstable ct3-ct4 transition state may, but need not, have charge.  If this is the case, why don't these packets of time come in every possible quantum size between the photon and the proton?  Why is this particular, measurable size stable?  What does this have to do with the quantum nature of time as we experience it?

There are easier questions to think about, why do they appear, upon the introduction of energy, to move away, discretely, from the proton?   This suggest little more than destabilizing them with ct2 states within the inner shell.

Should we talk about ct3 bundles smaller than electrons?  Electrons should potentially result from clouds of ct3 which bundle under certain circumstances but which otherwise balance the ct4 state of the proton.

The balance might be that the breakdown points of ct3 is the electron and the compression point of the proton to neutron is the proton.

Velocity time dilation separates or perhaps balances time with perceived movement but discretely.  These things take time.  AuT wasn't created in a day.  There were many wrong terms, wrong turns, mistaken assumptions, choices that had to be made, explored to a dead end, abandoned paths to be returned to and explored.

I did not go looking for time, so much as it found me.  I did not go looking for the connection between time and the electron so much as it forced itself upon me.

I sit in the darkness and the silence waiting for something, some insight, some answer, you.

A precise on time, universal expansion and a world of morons

What is so fucking stupid about the articles below is that they talk about the need for a new physics and the so called "new physics" already exists in the 6 books of Algorithm Universe Theory.
Now before I get to vent on that I will add my post about time.  Oh wait, too late.
http://www.techtimes.com/articles/221735/20180224/astronomers-use-improved-hubble-telescope-to-measure-expansion-rate-of-the-universe.htm

http://www.newsweek.com/universe-expansion-hubble-space-telescope-817511

Algorithm theory should be more broadly recognized,  Well, either that or I am a moron.

Speaking of morons, I'm going to suggest the books be read backwards.  Its a developing theory so you get the most up to date stuff in book 7 (not published but you're getting it live here) and the go backwards to pick up on the elements that need a little more explaining.

A precise on Time

Just as bundles of reflected waves carry the image of a bridge onto the water as a mirror image, so too does the present yield the future.  It is important to know that the more solid forms largely(but don't entirely) remain, planets, suns, even human bodies largely carry from one quantum time to the next.
Time is only those parts that come apart and come back together which is what we're going to talk about here and that only in relation to the movement through the "new ether" of ct1 space.

The transitions also occur both in a time free environment.  This means per second to the extent second are tracked,  gazillions of them can occur because seconds don't affect the transitions except at the ct4-ct5 level.
This is a little weird just as the idea that space has no dimension is weird, but that's the way it is.
When changes reach the level where they are ascertainable to us, they occur very quickly relative to a second, far below our ability to track them directly.  I've done the estimates in the books as to how long a quantum of time is and there is a change in these higher time affected states 1 for each quantum of time, 1.07x10^39 per second was the low estimate.

This brings us to the discussions of bundles and how electrons, protons and neutrons fit.

One can look at the higher state of matter (with its two primary transitional parts having stable exchange rates with one another-protons and electrons) as a series of discrete lines and this is actually drawn out.

What one sees here is that in ct4 (the "circle") you can peel off huge bundles of information as ct3 wave bundles slowly coming off as 10 x 1.68x10^6 ct2 bundles and each of these 10 peeling off carries enough information towards the electron, another proton, or neutron or to another band within the neutron shown itself to carry the past state of the entity that was peeled off to the future.

Somewhere between the ct3 octagon and ct4 decagon (I think) the electron pops up and become something important in the way of stability.  So lets examine this:

I. Compression
Let's look at Compression of the electron where the neutron is the stable ct4 state. We are using weight which is only an approximate measure of information, but it is what we have readily available.
1) An electron is 9.11x10-28 g
2) A proton is 1.6727x10-24g
3) A neutron is 1.675x10^-24 gram
Assuming 16 arms, an electron is not anywhere close to a full arm's worth of weight.
Looking at changes an electron is .0087 (not quite 1%) of one of the 16 arms.  You can also look at this as an electron is 1/1838.64 of a neutron and a proton is the rest.  The electron doesn't sound like much.
By weight, an electron is approx 5.4x10^12 wave elements and each electron is approx. 9.1x10^18 photons so we can see a lot of dimensional information is contained in an electron.

The results are no more satisfying looking at an electron as the stable ct4 state.  There are in such an event 1.06x10^37 e per arm and 5.78x10^33n per arm and 5.79x10^33p/arm.

None of these numbers suggest any immediate logic, and all of them assume that electrons have mass and potentially some form of at least transitional dimension which makes sense to us but is not mathematically sound within the model.

The problem is that transitional elements (electrons) exist as both wave and ct4 arm elements, more specifically they exist between 3 places (111-2 dimensions) and 4 places (1111-3 dimensions) in AuT mathematics, again assuming they are not a minimum  mass state.
The degradation of a neutron or the compression of electrons is not a mass/force equation because there is a dimensional transformation.
Worse still the data of this transformation is colored by pre-AuT mathematics of quarks and other fanciful daemons.

II. Forces
So lets ignore quantities which cannot be accurately determined in a common framework and just look at the relative forces.
10^38-Strong
10^36-electromagnetic
10^25-weak
1-gravity
These force elements provide a different look.  Again, this is the AuT version, not the pre-AuT version of force.
The electron to proton exchange state is seen as the electromagnetic force.
       This force is 10^36 and corresponds well to the number of electrons as a stable ct4 state.  Unfortunately, everything seems to point towards the neutron (charge balance, wave features of the electron, missing mass etc) as the stable   ct4 state
       This number is interesting but not the most interesting number.
       The force separating the electron from the proton based on its momentum is E=H^2/(2mr^2)-k(e)(e^2/r)
              This force difference (or perhaps force balance) also supports the electron as a transitional state, more wave than particle.  Waves are not part of ct4, except as portions or quantum elements of the arms.
       One conceptual idea is that the electron is an incompatible charge state, part of an anti-proton but still capable of exchanging information.  In this way, the electron cannot take the place on one of the arms, but as compatible states come off of the arm (decompression states) the decompressing electron can exchange them.
        So one can look at this relationship, in terms of AuT, as being the uncompressive tendencies of the electron are equal to the compressive tendencies of the proton, one being based on a scale of 1.68x10^6 (wave compression) the other being 1x10^16 (ct4 compression).
The neutron is seen as bound by the strong force to the rest of the nucleus.
The weak force is seen when you look at the proton being held together.
     The comparison is gravity to the weak force yields 4.3x10^24 changes per quantum instant (not a part of a second, but a time independent measurement.  This corresponds very well to the weak force 10^25 and provides at least a little support to the whole idea of compression between states on the scale given vrs the force observed (gravity:weak force is equal to change at gravitational level:change (max) at the ct4 level where the weak force is observed but this is a concept from book 2 and while important, adds little to the discernment of the electron/proton relationship.

III.  Transitional states for the sake of transitions

When looking at pure math, there is support for AuT conceptually.
The other numbers don't do much to help reconcile the status of an electron as a super stable intermediary, the proton to the election or either of them to the Neutron.

Substitution rates of x:y for electrons to protons should provide for a balance of the electron magnetic force to the average momentum of the electron E=H^2/(2mr^2)-k(e)(e^2/r) allowing the two states to be observed in terms of substitution rates so where a collapse is not happening and where the orbital state is stable E=4.3x10^24 (the suggested maximum rate of substitution for the neutron, approximately what it should be for the proton).  Since neither is substitution at the speed of light, some form of correction for the reduced speed needs to be determined.

Time becomes fairly important in this inquiry because there is no time for the electron and the time of the proton or neutron is probably the result of exchanges within the electron-proton pairing.  It is a fairly complex point of inquiry for AuT and one I'm not ready for yet.  Lets see if things make it more clear.

The existence of these bundles within the cloud formed by atoms yields averages that can give rise to the type of non-linear time we experience.

I'm a little surprised by the wealth of material in Book 7 also.  It's already 76 pages of new material and I'm only 1.5 weeks into a 7 week course (and as of today I'm 1.5 weeks behind!), mostly explaining gross chemistry using AuT which doesn't change the theory, but broaden its application.  I would like to post more into the course itself, but to keep from interrupting too much I have elected to follow it here.   Also, it requires cutting 1200 character posts which remain semi-lucid from these longer posts.

Atomic movement

I swam 2000 yards tonight after the longer, more aggressive workouts.
Considering it was a post-weight day, I suppose it was enough.
In truth I had no desire to do anything, curl up in a ball and die type of feeling.
But if you don't drink, you have to do something so the plan was to jump in, try to swim 1000 yards (which is truly nothing once you get in the water) and failing that maybe to use the no-parking spaces to say at least I tried.  Well, there were two parking spaces so what was I to do?
After the 1,000 yards, the idea was at least one with a goal of 3 im(s) but after 3 came 4 and despite feeling the cold claws of death at my heart, after 4, 5 and the 2000 yards which is a full work out and more than enough.
Now I am tight, unhappy, needing to stretch although I probably will not and surprising well fed since there were a lot of rotting, but not rotten vegetables and a couple of eggs which turned into a delicious omelet, could have served it in any restaurant in the world if the customers weren't allowed to see the veggies before they were cooked and I'm pretty satisfied if it doesn't kill me.  I also have a miniature apple which is more like a cherry tomato than a real apple, but you swim 2000 yards and despite most everything else you have an appetite.
Things did not go well today, more left undone than done, but I'm going to get busy working on the press release, updating it, cutting it back and getting ready for book 7, maybe even listen to another lecture.

The truth is that so far, AuT is only getting stronger, the relationship between orbits and balanced state changes really came up almost by itself, another incredibly strong indicator I'm right.
There is a longer section on this in the book, but it is worth considering.


Book 7 comes away as the higher state view, at least atomic view, although its target is as the anti-higgs boson book
Like most pre AuT physics we tend to overthink our importance as the most refined model when the show is largely driven by the underlying algorithm first and the other states second.
The amount of ct1 between other states drives their stability and the shift in the ct1 one states is the source of all force.
Indeed orbits appear to arrise from ct3 sharing between ct4 transitional  states and the process exchanges so much embeded ct1 with the ct1 surrounding the atom that the position of the otherwise "still" electron is excited to the observed speeds as the amount of ct1 around it constantly shifts.
We tend to look at the higher states as gobbling up these (see stephen king's longaliers) when in fact the ct1 is shifting things around as solutions transition.
The transitions, stepwise of necessity given the underlying quantum of things both reflects and provide a model for the underlying changes showing the gradual drop in space between states, but in discreet amounts.

A closer look at the hydrogen atom

I have not slept in over a week
except one night
when I did not sleep
but was a little better
I swam 3000 yrds,
then 2700 yards
the cold water wakes me
 i am healthy enough
nervous all the time
i am tired
i won't sleep tonight
i suppose
i am losing touch with things
people love the wretched
i am half an idiot savant
But the course, that is where I'm at.  I hoped this would shed some light on portions of the physics that were hidden and I am not disappointed.
I'm continuing to fall behind, but there are some very interesting features
and answers are coming.
This is an example.
I have destroyed the magic of time
Now to take a closer look at the hydrogen atom, 
a more complicated result without more complicated mathematics.

1.      A closer look at the hydrogen atom

The key point we are going towards is that the stable orbits for electrons reflect the places where the exchange rate between the nucleus and the first shell of electrons becomes stable for different ambient energy configurations.
Outer shells of electrons in more complicated orbits will reflect the same features.
While those calculations have not been done even for the Hydrogen atom, we can see they come from the standard orbital model.
For hydrogen we are looking at a “stable” electron proton pair.  This is a transitional state with a stable ct1 substitution rate.  However, the substitution rate can be increased with excited orbits which are transitional quantum changes: n=1,2,3, etc based on this formula: L=nh/2pi.

Likewise “a photon” is given off with a “frequency (wave length)” as you drop from one value of n to a lesser value indicating (by virtue of the wave) that it is more than one photon.  The energy given off is a function of the nh/2pi equation which translates easily into packets of ct1 exchange although pi has to have a universally applicable value (at least observable) and Planck’s constant has to be looked at in terms of ct1 exchange rate.  This is important because we need to know how much information is used in the calculation of pi, how many places are applicable.

The level of compression then varies within a range that does not completely destabilize as ct1 exchange rates increase.  The exchange of ct3 states as opposed to their replacement by ct1 exchange varies within this range without one totally substituting for the other.  It is a vibrational ct1 exchange as opposed to one which is destructive.

To the extent that waves are what are being viewed, it seems likely that these are an intermediary state between one dimensional photons and three dimensional neutrons with electrons and to a lesser extent protons being states that are transitions between two dimensional waves fixed 3 dimensional features of neutrons.  This raises the question of what are the transitional states, if they are neither waves nor 3 dimensional solids. 

The suggested result is that these electrons transition or "bounce" between the number of dimensions existing on either side of the inflection points depending on whether they are in the process of (compressing) building up or (decompressing) breaking down and the net averages that are represented.  What other choices would there be?

This suggests the uncomfortable (unstable) result that electrons would be transitioning between compressing towards a neutron state and breaking down to a wave state as it slowly transitions towards one state or the other. Frequency reflects the number of photons with the wave which are incremental because of the 2^n pairing possibly.  An examination of this transition vs the L=nh/2pi is worth considering.

The faster movement of electrons within the system is because the number of ct1 and ct2 substitutions vs bundled ct3 substitutions is greater than with a proton where the number of ct3 substitutions is greater, effectively bundled electrons or nearly that result.  

The alternative is to say that electrons are just probabilities which is not super-symmetric.  Instead the speed of ct1 substitutions is high because the transitions are unstable.

Ghosts, animal senses and a reason to be scared of the Russia

The new view embodied by AuT of time lends itself to explaining many phenomena of physics, but it also lends itself to the occult.

The Science of Nostradamus deals (primarily) with one area, prognostication.  It touches very briefly on an animal's ability to sense change based on the interpretation of time being built from mid level wave-matter forms past events disassociating and the re associating with higher states to embody the results of subsequent states.

An even more occult issue arises in the area of ghosts and other spirits of the past.  Indeed the conceptual basis and statistics suggest that we should be surrounded by ghosts and the question becomes why not?  The answer probably lies in the recombination of information which would take these necessarily present ghosts and incorporating them into history, memory after a fashion.  It is also possible that these ghosts are merely hard to see...

Memory, like many other features probably mirror these underlying methods of carrying information forward just as the spiraling shape of information moving from the past to the present is reflected in the double helix which is likely not entirely coincidental.

Because the prediction of the future from the past is possible, we must be mindful of the inherent potential to make mistakes, such as by electing the worst possible candidates to represent us allowing for the end of days that has been repeatedly predicted for us from different sources.

Book 7 is continuing to develop, now it includes the common wave feature of, well, waves between electrons and photons.
It also is beginning to cover the higher state interactions which is quite exciting.  No huge mathematical breakthroughs or theoretical insights are envisioned or even present necessarily yet, but the application of the the higher concepts is providing certain theoretical features that may help to define the higher ct state relationships of electrons, protons, neutrons and their states and there will be more interpretation of data as change rates as opposed to everything else.

What next?  Only next week will tell.

This looked like something the President should consider.

The lady doth protest too much, methinks (Hamlet)

I need to start putting some stuff in between physics or you'll think i'm in a rut.
There is a particularly good article on what happens when you allow idiots and criminals to run countries.
http://www.aljazeera.com/investigations/theoligarchs/
We have to be careful what we allow to happen because this need not be something which repeats for us, although as I've said in the past, stupidity is apparently built into the system, just as the recognition of the genius of Aut is hidden by aspects of the self protecting system of predestination.  At best an inadequate number of people will be aware of the true nature of things.

On a lighter note, here is one more sign of the apocalypse.

Robot Strippers Are Real, and They're Invading Las Vegas (Video) http://flip.it/zJp_Pc

The slit test, and Ball of Fire

Gary Cooper said, in Ball of Fire, "The scientific conquest of an important subject is never dull."  While not as important as the delightful Barbara Stanwyck it is more applicable to what is happening here. 

Before I get too deeply into the slit test,let me say that the variations suggested in the article below have not be performed to see what information might be forthcoming.  Were I to have a candle and a match, I would certainly not have a slit or the time to make one.
AuT is necessarily a logic based system which is internally mathematically consistent. Any problems which might arise from a different test result would merely suggest the way the equations were examined needed to be tweaked, the underlying definitions of time,dimension and compression state remain inviolate.

1.      The slit test

We start at the end, the Heisenberg uncertain principle, you cannot measure the light passing through without changing the result.  This merely means that the math of the prior art is inadequate.

What we’re going to do is discuss what appears to be the reason for the slit test results and how to deal with them

First what happens when light passes through a slit?  We can assume that AuT is accurate and light moves between photonic states and wave states in a time free environment.  The reason is because time will not exist until you get to the ct3-ct4 transition at the earliest. (see the prior post on light).  While I have called this movement between states averaging, it is not an average over time since it is a pre-time change and this is part of the reason the test fails, for the same reason the Morley and Michelson experiment fails.  It is an exchange in pre-time and therefore so fast that we do not observe it.

So what happens when this transition occurs.  We can assume due to the two dimensions of waves and the one of photons, more photons pass through the slit than waves.  Once other the other side they reassemble based on the type of waves that arrived at the slit.
This happens in a pre-time environment which is important. This is the reason that we see the two separate states as a duality.  The "time" for recombination (compression and decompression followed by compression again and so on) is zero.  In the environment of super-symmetry there are discrete points for photons and waves.

This brings us to an issue that requires more consideration.  Why one wavelength and not another.  Why does light return to the original state after it passes through.  The reason has to do with substitution rates and different transitions and the transitions of the waves that result, but a more detailed discussion must wait.  The point is that the energy of a beam of light as a part of wavelength can change but how that occurs is a question for a later post. For now we’ll ignore what state the light returns to.

How can we prove this theory?  The answer is that there are several ways, none of which are satisfying because I cannot perform them.

Varying the length at which either light exits whichever slit is one way to observe this issue, but the speed with which they reassemble and the distance both suffer from the same problem, they have to approach a quantum length in order to see the result.

A similar way to accomplish this is to extend the length of the walls of the slit, although you  would have to deal with dissipation along the length.

The idea is the length is long enough or the slot hole small enough the wave length going in approaches photonic size and varies the type of wave moving through.

But otherwise, at any length which is measurable the transitional nature of the light is reestablished.

Let us take one look at the conversion that occurs in the photon to wave alteration.  This is rough and only an initial look, but all these observations must follow the basic rules or substitution rates and compression.
The wave spectrum is made up of waves of different wavelengths. The energy of the photon is inversely related to the wavelength of the wave: 
The energy of the photon is presumably a density issue since there is a constant rate change in terms of speed.
lambda = h*c/E where lambda is the wavelength, h is Plancks constant, c is the speed of light and E is the energy of the photon.   
The photons can be thought of as the particles in the light wave and as they are concentrated relative to the space,the wave length has to expand to accommodate them by allowing more ct1 around each one.

https://tsw.createspace.com/title/8176429

AuT and the photoelectric effect

Strangely, the book is published already. Things must be slow at Amazon.

This is the first pass by this which I'm posting in "real time" as they say so I can keep moving.  As a result it will come off a little rough, but I'll get back and edit it.

There are a couple of charts concerning the photoelectric effect and there there is the AuT version of things followed by an explanation.

Also, the proof version of the Science of Nostradmas is now available.  If you want to see what could easily be called book 7 of AuT, but in what I hope is a more entertaining format, there it is.  It has all the characters that I talk about in it from a historical perspective and it also covers the true nature of time.  That it isn't dedicated to the muse (there's no dedication because I didn't make the time to put one in) might be made up for in part by making her a lead character.  Go figure.

For this discussion we’re going to use the two figures above for the PE effect.

W=energy of photon necessary to kick out an electron

R Energy increases linearly with Frequency: E=F*H where H is Planck’s constant.

AuT Our previous discussions show that PC is a compression minimum tied to 256:27 substitution rates.

AuT-Frequency is the number of folds in two dimensions, so we can assume this is increasing the amount of dimension in the interim ct3-ct4 transitional state. The closer this transitional state approaches ct4, the more it will act like one billiard ball hitting another. But in AuT there are no billiard balls, so we’ll use the second figure to discuss what happens.

AuT-PEP (Pauli Exclusion) dictates that contact is an illusion.  Using the diagram for transitional states discussed before it can be seen that inserting ct1 states within a system destabilizes it, in this case a ct5 is shown destabilized, but it could be any state where the same net effect is given.  These drawings, are discussed in the prior volumes of AuT.

(R)  E^2=c^2P^2+m^2C^4.  E=mc^2 in this sense comes from the fact that photons and waves are seen to have no mass and hence P (momentum)=0.

(R) Momentum is defined as H/L (L is used for Lamda and is the wave length). If E=cp=HV=cH/L

AuT what we see here is that momentum is a function of H/L or the substitution constant/amount of information in each quantum moment in one dimension.   What this indicates is that the substitution rate per quantum instant decreases as the wave length increases which is what you would expect since the longer the length, the longer the same group of information has to be absorbed within the framework of the bottom drawing.

So this result must also hold for all other forms of information (ct4 collisions for example) so the first thing we have to realize is that the reason momentum is absent in ct2 (photons) is because momentum is a change in position over time and ct2 and ct3 are both time independent.  Still the same features must have the same effect.
What we're dealing with here is a unit problem.  Whenever we reduce things from the observed, 3rd dimensional view into the component parts, the inconsistencies, for example the ludicrous statement that uses momentum or the lack of it to describe light, are removed.
It is also important to remember that the person shining the light is an effect as much as the photon is, but we can ignore those aspects although its worth remembering.
All collisions regardless of state have the basic components as follows:
1) Pauli and more importantly solution order means that on a quantum level there is no actual contact.  Contact is a post AuT effect.
2) Collisions result from reduction of ct1 (space) between solutions to the point where the underlying interaction is considered more significant than the constant interactions such as gravity and more particularly the common change to the single variable.
3) What we consider significant is not significant to the universe.
In any collision the primary change lies in the ct1 variation between states which makes the photoelectric effect a particularly good one to study because it minimizes the other effects, but also involves at least a transitional ct4 state (electrons).  
The most basic of interactions is ct1 (alone) increasing between ct4 solutions (transitional solutions if you call a neutron a stable ct4 state).   Studying these results should help support one solution or the other, the primary indicator of neutrons as stable ct4 states is the neutral charge, the primary non-indicator is the size of the strong and weak forces embodied in the Neutron system.
In long wave lengths, the ct1 substitution rate is slow enough that there is time for the ct1 to go through the ct4 state in the fashion of ongoing ct1 exchanges which are constant.  One might even go so far as to call space a type of infinitely broad wave, but the limit in AuT is as things approach 1 (not zero) or as things approach the next compression state so that analysis is not perfect and it also looks at the two dimensional form instead of pure photon ct1 form.
With short enough wave lengths ct1 is being pumped into the space between the electron and the other states at a speed fast enough that it cannot just move through and the electron begins to separate as the intervening ct1 states increase.  Once other resulting forces from the sharing of ct3 states (time) is reduced sufficiently the additional acceleration is reflected in the increase in ct1 states being substituted in the electron and the substrate from which is is ejected and this high substitution rate increases the separation between the two.
More ct1 exchange can be imposed and remain with the structure of the ct4 state that it has to radiate the ct1 state or break apart, this being shown as heat.  A laser has this effect at a high enough level that the effects of the vibration increase within the substrate is more easily recognizable.

Higher state collisions are still subject to the 3 rules, but with greater substitution ratios between higher states, so that an arrow hitting a target experiences reduced ct1 separation and the rapid ct1 substitutions of the arrow and the need to add substitutions as it enters causes the expansions, heat and reformation, but fundamentally is is the same as the unobserved photoelectric effect.

You should really read the book, but it is a first draft, more of a proof than a finished book, but worth looking at.

Science of Nostradamus

Well, the proof edition is ready.
And no, I couldn't kill that character I planned on killing in the end.
Don't ask me why or why not.

Could Nostradamus see the future?  Does physics allow for this?

Time is not what you've been taught all your life, it is instead the result of the breakdown and rebuilding of the present, small blocks of information at a time, which are offset by acceleration reflected by the substitution of quantum and smaller bits of information which cannot carry a clear record of the past with them as the reassembled large blocks can.

Who were the players that led to this finding?  This book, as a work of historical fiction, discusses some of them, mostly real people who existed, perhaps even the muse.

Should be available over the weekend. Go figure.

More on this later.

The true nature of space and time-a short article

This is a summary in very few words of the 1000 pages of the Algorithm Universe Series.  It is, however, comprehensive without the background information.  The detailed mathematical computations and figures appear in those books but prove unnecessary for this discussion.

The True nature of dimension.

It is confusing to talk about space so we will call it dimension.   The universe is a true quantum universe meaning there is a single variable which increases by a single amount 1,2,3, etc.  This is the rate of change and IS NOT time; nor is it directly related to time.  It has nothing directly to do with the directional nature of time.

Space is solid in the sense that there is nothing between quantum states of space because there is no room for anything to be between them.  This requires that space be mathematical solutions from our point of reference and the relative solution order is the only separation medium possible.  Space is defined as linear solutions to the equation fpluspix, the denominator in the infinite series (increasing in degree by 2 and varying between positive and negative) of pi.  The numerator refers to the number of dimensions changing together.
Photons or the particle version of light are created by the ratio of 27 to 256 changes in space where 256 changes are aligned due to the solutions of fpluspix being positive and negative alternating noting that due to the nature of fpluspix these alignments will be temporary but will reform.
The very fast changes of space to light would only occur at either the center or extremes of the universe due to the solution order issue.  We would no see them because they would not exist long enough to reach us in higher dimension solutions nor would they last long enough to experience them since they would essentially flash on and off without a time reference.
The ether experiment did not show this feature because wave length variation requires a time based change in light waves and the exchange between quantum space and light occurs without a time reference and creates velocity in one dimension and the effect of compression at a scale we experience as gravity.  There is a prior compression scale at -1 to 1 which is a pre-space variation giving rise to fpluspix based on the original counter.  The relative difference between fpluspix and -1^x gives rise to all dimensional features of the universe; allowing a constant rate of change to vary infinitely larger and smaller although given a quantum universe, the amount of information in the universe is finite at any quantum moment or, more accurately, at any value of x.
The second dimension and all subsequent dimensions are essentially derived in the same manner but instead of 27:256 the ratio is 1:2f(x)^2^x where f(x) is the Fibonacci series number for x. Variation in this result is likely at higher states, but observational data indicates that it is slight.
Substitution requirements (27:256) requires that there be a layer of lower dimensional states outside of each higher dimensional state or it falls apart when there is a change in fpluspix net for any dimensional state.
Calling 1 dimension ct2 (the 27 of the 27:256), dimension as we experience it begins at ct2 because of the ratio of 27:256.  This light photon constantly moves through space due to the substitution at each change in x.  It can also self destruct into pre-dimensional ct1 if the internal solutions change from -/+ to -/- or +/+.   This all occurs in a time independent environment.
One can envision ct2 as a line.
Gravity and dark energy (anti-gravity) are nothing more than the net positive vs net negative values of fpluspix locally and for the universe at large.  The big bang, therefore, is (in a time free state initially and later in a time filled state) the inflection points between these constantly shifting results.
Ct3 is the quantum transition between one dimensional ct2 and two dimensional ct3.  The alignment occurs the same way, but in this case the bundles of ct2 have a net positive or negative values which correspond to magnetism in higher dimensional states and they combine in the same way but in this ratio.  This ratio a:2f(x)^2^x gives rise to the equation e=mc^2 for x=4. (2*5)^(2^4).  Black holes, therefore, are nothing more than the ratio where x=5.  Transitional states, however, are very important as will be discussed momentarily.
One can envision ct3 as the lines drawn on a piece of paper in a quantity equal to 2f(2)^2^2 for each piece of paper.  It can be seen that these lines are constantly exchanging (velocity) with one another and that they shift or fall from the paper to be substituted with free lines in space.  From the stand point of the piece of paper, no matter how many sheets of paper are combined, they exist in one dimension.  Velocity is the same for each line no matter whether they are on the paper or not because of the constant substitution rate.  Note that all values are quantum values down to space and all vary together based on a single variable, but the relative change (whether on a piece of paper or off of it, whether part of a line or independent, vary, although a high values of x, the changes of fpluspix relative to -1^n are long.
The transitional states where combinations are partial are important because they provide the bridge between states and these bridges are seen as force elements when time is introduced, but each change in x creates a quantum universe which is fixed.
When these sheets are stacked in three dimensions (x=4) the transitional states moving between the three dimensional features can carry information, these are bundles of waves for all intents and purposes.  This carrying of information between ct4 states relative to the lower replacement of ct1 states which is velocity is what we call time.  As can be seen, it has nothing directly to do with the underlying counter for the quantum universe.  We are able to discern history and time because these bundles carry the history between relatively dense collections of ct3 states.
It appears that the electron is the stable ct4 state and that protons and neutrons are transitional ct4-ct5 states, the math for this appearing in those books along with everything else.
Just as the paper cannot see in 3 dimensions, we cannot see in 4 dimensions.  If we could, then we would see black holes stretching out in a 4th dimension just as the piece of paper would see us as a stack of papers (as opposed to scattered papers) which is the reason for the perceived volume in the universe.
For this reason we know what gravity is, the relationship of gravity to other forces, what black holes are and the like. We know that the higgs boson is an effect and not a thing and we know what space and time are and their relationship.

You're welcome (ha).

How the dimensional nature of things works

so i figured out how to see how these multiple dimensions work.   draw a line on a piece of paper on the other side another going at right angles.  Now run all over the room  with it waving it.  No matter how many dimension you wave it in, the line stays on the paper and relative to the paper doesn't experience anything else.
This is ct2 (the paper) the line is ct2.
Now acordion fold it so that one line is parallel to the folds.  Doesn't matter which one, and number a billion of these using the f-series number (-3,5,-7,...up to the billionth place.  Ths part is a little more complicated and time consuming.  On another piece of paper write 1, then lay out the -3.  As it counts from 1 to 3, this one will stay in the same place but when it goes to 2 lay the 5 so that its accordion folds line up with those of the -3 so the lines are alligned.  when  you get to 4, the negative 3 one will flip and they won't be aligned anymore.   Continue this process for all billion of the pieces of paper and you get a feel for how compression works for ct2-ct3. 
It's a little messy.
anyway, if you do it right, then eventually you get me typing these notes, largely being ignored, but having actually figured out not only space, but the entirely  new version of time (associated with, but not a part of, quantum change).
It's really pretty impressive, but no one really seems to care.  We'll see, its early yet.  It would be quite a shock to the system.
I swam 3000 yards tonight, 1100 IM which surprised me since I was tired going in, but I'm not in a good mood right now and that apparently leads to both insight into physics and good workouts, at least when I can force my morose self to start.

I don't know what it all means, I am working towards something.

The new ether-part 2

Your ideas of the universe expanding are based on inaccurate interpretations.  Time is almost certainly ct3-ct4 transitional states compared to ct1 and ct2 transitional states.  The reason is that at the ct3 state, waves can carry enough information in the aggregate to see what has happened before, but to qualify as true historical time you need sufficient amounts of information to convey the actual events, hence the ct3-ct4 transitional states.
So much of the data derived, such as the Morley and Micehson experiment is based on nonsense because they represent  the ‘inaccurate interpretation of data.’  Instead of seeing the fundamental proofs, all they get is nonsense.

Only to those who don’t take time to understand AuT is the universe not a single variable algorithm driven machine.  The universe is expanding because it is in a post compression phase.  It appears to move faster as you look out because you are looking back in time and it is expanding slower, not faster.  You know it cannot go faster than the speed of light but it does.  There is only one way that is possible and that is if the amount of space is increasing.  Why?  Because it is an explosion?  There is no fuel for that.  It is compressed space falling apart, creating the illusion of entropy over anti-entropy and giving the relatively steady (although by no means completely steady) version of time we experience.  At the inflection points, time may take on a meaning difficult for us to understand, however similar its history will be to ours.

The Flaw:

The space-ether test of Michelson and Marley was flawed, every physicist but me is wrong and I've basically discovered everything or I'm wrong.  No seriously, the test is flawed.

The fixed velocity idea is incorrect because velocity includes both time and dimension.  Time is an illusion that only begins at ct3 and only at ct4 in earnest.
Light exchanges with space as a pre-time, pre-dimensional state.  Light itself has only two elements (dimensions) of time in its wave form and a time free one element (dimension) as photons.
.
Ether (the name they used for space before AuT) doesn't fill space, it is space itself and the earth doesn't move through it because it space is dimensionless.  Dimensionless things necessarily do not flow.  Solution order can exist without movement. At that level all things change at once so looking for consequent phase shifts in wavelengths is absurd.  
Lets talk about this and I'll start with a metaphor.  If I hold up a bag of sand and ask how much candy is in it and you guess 1 piece and we run it through a sieve and there is no candy you don't say that candy doesn't exist.  If you're really interested in the bag, you say we should be looking for sand and not candy in the bag.  
That is the problem with the test for the movement of light (or anything else through space).  Neither space nor light has time.  The shift due to movement through the "new" ether, doesn't occur because it is a ct2 outer shell-ct1 exchange whether in terms of waves or in terms of photons.
 We've known this since the 1920's.  Lorentz and Einstein solved for this.  Indeed, Einstein's comment that we all take our own time is the equivalent (given the proofs of AuT)of saying we take our own dimension with us.
Space has neither time nor dimension, but it still exists.  Passing through it requires that it be processed along with the higher compression states of information or everything would be stuck in place.  We have to distinguish between quantum change and time which are vastly different, the second requiring two different parts of dimension.
Light does not have time, but it does have one dimension.  However the velocity in one dimension, having no second rate of substitution has no relativity and that means that it has no time.  Looking for a time based change between space and light is like looking for candy in a bag that only has sand in it.  We know this, by the way, because acceleration to the speed of light eliminates time.  We also know that history requires sufficient information be carried from one compression state to the next to allow in a quantum state where nothing is moving the experiences of the prior states to be viewed (as history) although they cannot be "felt," at least not the way we are used to feeling things, since momentum is largely history being felt, by way of example.
The illusion of dimension in space is only because we carry our 3 dimensions with us.   It is like looking down on a sheet of drawings with two dimensions on them.  We see them in 3 dimensions even though they only have two.
Dimension arises from ratios of different dimensions and they allow us to look down on 2, 1 and 0 dimensional space with perspective which is apparent to us only because we are not total flatlanders.   Of course, compared to black hole states we are, but that is another chapter.
Are you ready to order the books yet?  They are available on amazon.  And I have not forgotten about you in case that's what your wondering about I just have to finish laying out the universe and doing my gig.

The new Ether part 1-a summary

Space is expanding because of a break down in higher compression states moreso than the increase in information although both effect expansion.
All coordinate change is in one direction, because the single variable only increases (so far), but compression, originally theorized to work according to intersecting spirals (an effect of the true cause and f-series stacking in botht the same and higher place states) is intead theorized to be the result of fseries net variations, although both are ct0/ct1 pheonomena and therefore time independent.

Time isn't a dimension at all it turns out.  Time is the ratio of ct1-ct2 exchange to ct2 and higher exchanges although what we call time may be nothing more than ct3-ct4 exchanges.
This is a spectacular determination, but carries quite of bit of explanatory baggage with it because ct1 exchange is the new ether because space is the  same stuff that all other states are comprised of, a fact so painfully, logically obvious that it can hardly be called a discovery at all.  The universe crystalizes from space mathematically.

In the early NLC version of AuT, there was a fixed future and it prevented coordinates from occurring at the same point twice.  The universe itself changes so this is impossible and it grows in terms of points from the middle so the other points are constantly moving outward except to the extent they compress.  This would appear over time to create a shell of ct1 states although at least the possiblibilty of compression at the edges with  space leaking outward (the last solutions) seems possible.  From a sci-fi standpoint, one can at least imagine a sold ct4-ct5 shell or rings at the edge of the universe.
order separates them.  

Likewise, for this same reason, every point affecting every other point, they never occupy the same relative space no matter what relative to each other point.  The gravity experienced for higher ct states always is changing with each quantum change.  This gives the illusion of rotation to the universe and prevents even the intentional movement to a prior point that would be the equivalent of standing still.

***

Spiral expansion/contraction reflects the stacking of f(x) states on the scale of (f3 or f4) 6^4, 10^8 or greater.  You cannot accelerate back to a prior state or even a prior position although we think we can move in 3 dimensions, we are only moving in one.

This concept of non-repetition affects expansion by imparting perceived movement over time which time is the ratio of ct1 exchange (memory free) to ct3 or 4 exchange which maintains enough information to allow a qunatum state to have memory of the prior state, albeit a constantly degrading memory.

Secondary phenomena are not true phenomena.  Spin, for example, requires dimensional separation and an extra axis about which revolving occurs.  Quantumm examination of spin requires adding the movement of the spinning body with all other points.

Movement at the quantumm level is not really movement, but is merely relative position changing of ct1 states due to compression and the relatively minor today (but greater in a commpressing universe) increase in total information.
The semi-paradox of moving information at different relative points and all points moving more together than apart will occur at an inflection point; but the statiscal concept of even approximate identity of solution (exact identity impossible because of the overall change of the universe) is very small.  That is, the "ct1" in the universe will compress after 7 billion years (the approximation) and things viewing the universe at that point will think of the universe as a big compression event instead of a big bang event until the next inflection point where the net fplupix solutions go positive.

In the overall change we cannot put any point at the same dimensional location twice without exceeding the speed of light due to these features.  However state is what is important at the quantum level and that shifts only between positive and negative results.
  

The universe is a giant adding machine where all the keys once pushed stay down but where there are extra keys added (one at a time)  so they can be pushed again and the level pulled to add them together to get quantum states.

The resulting movement is fairly easy to envision today with a universe spinning at an enormous size.  The initial universe is constant dimension free change.
In the middle there is a more compact universe where all the points are very compact, spinning near the center, but unable to be at the same point twice.  At the center, spin and coordinate change has to be very high under NLC theory to maintain the overall light speed change coordinates, but being time independent, the change rate is the only thing that matters and this occurs at the same speed for every point.  

There are no actual specific "locations" but only the impression, illusion or effect of dimension.
In the intersecting  model of NLC there was still the impression of movement in an outward spiral with the possibility of any of these myrid interacting quantum points every coming in contact with a lower line of the spiral where they might find some continuity.  The need for a mechanism mathematically to prevent the overlap which moves information away from the center rapidly to create this faster than light phenomena in intersecting logarithmic spirals led to an examination of the construction of dimension which, thankfully, appears to be embedded in the pi and sin equations.

Under the phenomena of both AuT and the earlier NLC, all base information change is at a common rate.  Stacking of information (as in the example of spirals off of spirals) allows for information to change at  different relative rates (e.g. 5x1 is smaller than 5x6 even though in writing them out they are not different), one rate changing faster than others stacked on it, so that we get the effects that led the pre-NLC, pre-AuT to assume that only time was uni-directional and that the other dimensions had multiple axis.  All the dimensions frunction from a single axis (albeit an increasing one) and time is an effect and not a dimenstion at all.

NLC (non linear coordinate theory), being a fixed, time independent system proved points could not be in the same place or move backwards to a pior point so the illusion of movement had to be explained using a system that prevented duplication.  In order to arrive at this state of things at our speed of rotation it appeared necessary for the universe to extend the movement outward at a very high rate of speed or rotate rapidly which give rise to the illusion of expansion, spin and angular momentum.

Space must constantly change state or the entire system would solidify.  To say that higher ct states crysalize from the lower states is true, but so must the higher states switch back.  The resulting model of NLC which is not contraindicated by the alternative model of AuT indicates that the universe is continually moving to a higher maximum compressive state, albeit as an infinite converging series, which suggests at least the possibility that at some point, compression will be so high, the universe even during the expanding phase will be mud-like.  The AuT model alone, suggests this is less likely, but with intersecting spiral effects, the end result of a very compact (ct(near infinity)) states remains a possibility.  While this would be dead to us higher dimensional logic in these increasingly stable universes might exist.
Shazaaam!

The ability of Nostradamus to predict the future accurate is tied to the ability both the preservation of the past and the method of building the future.   We have programmed in our minds the ability to examine these quantum historical states that were combined for the current quantum state.   
It is entirely logical that with the destruction and recombination according to such a rigid pattern that an equally blurred picture of the future is available if you know how to look for it.
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle (a fallacy in true super-symetry) actually rears its head at this point in the examination since the ability to see the future exactly must fade with the ability to change it for paradoxical reasons and the same formulation which is tied to the relationship limitation of ct1 substitution [(1-v^2/c^2)^1/2 at the ct4-ct5 level] applies.
This jives fairly well with predicting the future.  The past, being already constructed of pieces of the present is more clear.  The loose pieces of the past standing ready to come back together exist at a lower compression state so there has to be a way in which these missing pieces and their tendecy towards recombination can be sensed.  Since for practical purposes these are ct3-c4 states or at least transitional ct3-ct5 states, the ability to determine them would seem to be theoretically not only possible, but possible with such percision in a limited way to allow absolute prediction.
Before you scoff, this is exactly what happens when we predict very limited features (like chemical reactions) and very large features (like planetary orbits).  Hence, to get back to Nostradamus, his intent study of past and future planetary orbits for his almanacs is precisely the type of analysis one would engage in to predict a more human future.  This is the subject of a book (fictionally presented) coming out in March in all probability in at least a first draft form under the working title of "The Science of Nostradamus," which I have discussed previously.
One might ask, reasonably, could we predict our future and change it thereby overcoming the H-uncertainty principle. The answer, because there is no uncertain in AuT is yes at the ct4-ct5 level, no at the ct1 level.  The difference is that the speed of light is an effect and not underlying cause of supersymetry.   Hence, we can see events coming, water flooding a city when snow melts to pick an obvious example, and build a dam to stop it.  This involves logically seeing how the past will yield the future in precisely the same manner, it being understood that an earthquake or other even could alter our predictions of the future at this level, but not changing the overall ability to more precisesly predict it based on the recombination of solutions principles inherent in AuT.  Knowing the value of individual fseries solutions for the underlying states of even a very small amount of matter would involve enormous computing power, so the mind of a true reader of the future would have to be trained to evaluate the destruction of time and somehow average or evaluate the possibility of reassembly.  That chemistry and physics and political science allow us to do this with vary degrees of success makes it likely that a true fortune teller could exist.
  

More detail on all of these issues can be found in the six published books.
The next post on the new ether will document the flaws that led to the mistaken interpretation of results in the ether test of Michelson and Marley which led to developement around the correct version of solution order, compression and expansion along the dimensional model preserved in pi.

time, anti time and the proof of AuT in black hole singularities

The fleeting thorught that there is someone for everyoen and if everytihng coudl just line up just right, everyone would have the right person for themselves if even for a moment.

Book 7 weighs in (at the beginning of week 2 of the course) at 279 pages with only 38 pages having to do with the course so far.  I hope to take those 240 pages and whittle them down to 200 pages or less so that the total length of the book is 250 pages or less. Book 6 which also has a lot of extraneous, not fully edited nonsense was around 280 pages and its worth noting that most of the extraneous stuff is repetitive or of limited value.

Here is something from book 7, mind bending but simple:
How does a black hole shrinking to what is called by pre-AuT physics to a signularity prove AuT?
In order to understand this, first remember that dimensions are merely "places" in F-series solutions.  You must also remember that base 10 is irrelevant, that each number is merely another jot on the prison wall.  Also, you must remember that time is not what we thought it was, certainly it isn't a dimension, it is stephen king crap (which is covered below); and that isn't meant to be insulting.  My life is crap right now, if you don't like the language substitute something else, I for one will certainly use something else in book 7.
So let's start by talking about the 3 dimensional singularities.  Yes, we live in what a two dimensional being would see as a singularity.
2 to 3 dimensional conversion is 10^8 in scale.  What that means is that immediately before a 2 dimensional feature changes to 3 dimensions there are 10^8 of them side by side.  The space around them is shrinking precipitously but it can go either way.  In terms of place, everything is 1111, 1112,1113, etc.  This is important.  This assumes that space is ct1 even though it has no dimension because there is no ratio, so don't let me get too confusing here, since it could just as easily be 111, 112, 113 and I'll get to that specifically in book 7 and later posts.  The weird drawing covers all this in books 5 and 6 in case you don't want to wait.
Anyway...imagine a skyscraper 10^8 stories high.  In a two dimensional space (1111,1112,1113...1111x10^8) floor plans would be lined up next to each other.  When the 3rd dimension is added, you can stack them.  They all disappear except for one since the other 10^8 are stacked on top of it in the 3rd dimension.
Black holes are really big Suns (3,5,8)^(2^5)=16^16 electrons (or maybe neutrons, but probably electrons).  These appear to be in two dimensions, but we know that each electron is merely 10^8 1111,1112....states) but these have now been spread out even further in 3 dimensions (giving them a spherical effect, but of course the algorithm is dimension free and hence everyone who (and that includes just about everyone so don't feel bad of you're one of them)  rejects AuT thinks they are living in dimensional space, but they are just full of SKC as it were.  So anyway, you have these 16^16 electrons and they suddenly stack (11111,11112...11111x16^16) in this 5th space (4th dimension) and so we only see one of them.
So the pre-AuT physicists said "oh my, gravity took them to a singluarity, oh my" which is idiotic in retrospect.  The algorithm merely solves them for a 5th place and they are stacked out in this dimension.  And all the physics clowns who want to dream about worm holes in this 5th dimension are just jerking their brains because solution order still defines the relationship and no matter where you enter, you exit only on the other side of the 5th dimension, hence the reason we see quasar type rays ejecting out of the poles of the black hole.

Hence, black hole observations confirm AuT mathematical suggestions.


A note on Stephen King Crap or real time:

Here are some problems with non aut analysis of higgs results
1) time-what is it?  it comes from something and it goes somewhree.  Stephen King posited that something came along and ate it, not a terrible idea, what do they shit?  that's actually not far from the aut answer.
Fibonacci concept good, but info doesn't grow fast enough.
Time past falls apart and reassembles into time future but irreguarly so some is always together as others fall apart or reassemble relatively in higher states.
2) contact-what is it?  Fields interacting sounds good but then you have problems with wave particle duality ultimately.  Two points cannot occupy the same space at the same time in a true quantum environment, and yet they bounce?  How?
The transitional elements break up when put close together in terms of solution or go to next higher state and if not stable they break down.
suggestions that amount of info increases: 1) time 2) expansion o funiverse but the truth is more subtle.  how about entropy going both ways-we assemble stuff so we're having anti-entropy; we're misled by the net amount.  same with gravity and antigravity.

One last issue on dimension and gravity (gmM/r^2):
here are two directions for r, both having their interesting features: 
as r goes to infinity the force goes to zero, but never gets there. 
the other limit is equally interesting. as r goes to zero the force goes to infinity but never gets there 
what happens? 
We see this, by the way, almost zero at neutron stars and then at not-zero? in black holes. It also occurs (approximately) when two protons are forced together in a collider. What happens as gravity goes to zero and how is that taken into account in the results of the Higgs experiment? 
Features gravitational force, r going to zero. Velocity going in the direction of the speed of light. What features are common to both of these that allow, not infinite gravity (the limit function as r goes to zero is only not infinite gravity if it goes to some version of 1) as seen in the neutron star-black hole transition; but the features instead yield quasi newtonian billiard ball type velocity transfers (and transitions from protons to what I suspect will be called quark type objects including bozons). 
I submit there is something that prevents r going to zero (despite the collision effects) and consequent break down results.
 Imagine two charged "mass" states (I'd call them ct4-ct5 transitional states) approaching one another. R is going to zero.  The variance of electrostatic repulsion is varying as F=dq/r^2(1/dpie(0)) and gravity is changing as F = G M1xM2/r2 (from Ray below)
F= the force between the two bodies 
G = Gravitational constant 
M1 / M2 = Mass of the objects 

r2 - The distance
Let's talk about "quantum space," Planck length being the type of measurement that suggests you have this feature (which requires that space convert to an information state, otherwise you could cut it in half), going to zero.  The whole purposes of the "experiment"  we're talking about is to collide the two particles but they cannot occupy the same space at the same time.

Something has to happen as r (quantum space) goes to 1 (I'm not willing to accept 0) which results in the breakdown of one or both of the mass/charged particles. I remember that there is "space" involved in the separation of the quantum elements (as shown in the chart at the end of week 1 if you buy into that model) presumably held together by strong/weak force fields, but shouldn't those be subject to spatial separation?
Think about it, and think on this, you are reading the blog of the only person on the planet who understands time and dimension, except you, of course.  Go figure.