Physics 3

A.    Part 3

The specific model is examined along with where we see the model working.

It would be possible to say, here is the formula, take it.

It is better to suggest a route to the formula.

The most important test of any theory is the Parmenides Test which was put forward by Parmenides via the Greek Muse.  AuT, in a prior form was, at the time, attempting to address this issue by pointing out that the infinite definition of pi, where the solution to the number of points for the denominator was infinite, was inherently illogical.  In case you think there is some ulterior motive for the dedications, it could be this contribution.  The standard model does not even attempt, in its most general form, to address the Parmenides test.  If you review the books, AuT solves the Zeno Paradox and if those cannot be answered by a theory, then it may be discounted.

There are many places where the model works according to scale because the formula was developed according to an observed scale:

E=mc^2 is one

Black hole compression is another, a little vague.

The Compression Count back and forward is another.

A more complex support for the model is the math surrounding the transition from ct-1 to ct1 and the transition from fpix to the specific model.

Since this is a lot to take in, it will be done in two posts.

This post examines one potential transition from fpix to the specific model.

This post also looks at the ct-1 to ct1 transition to find evidence of the scale.

After this post, I will put up the specific model and discuss how it applies to the mass energy equations and black holes.

A very important undertaking is arriving at a mechanism to get From -1^x to f(x)

This shows one solution where the difference in values can result from the addition of two prior values to get a current value.  In column 2 it is equal to column 2+abs(col 30 for example.

Ct-1 to ct1

This shows the breakdown of pi and pi for various dimensions:

This merely shows the first result for pi-1 (-1^x) and pi for 1 (-1^x) for x=1 and 2 respectively

Pi for -1 and 1 (for one place, not as a series, although series ratio is same)

Y=256/27 or 256:27

N=1

The purpose of this exercise is to force sin(y) for pi(-1) to be equal to sin(y) for pi1 to be equal to -1*-1.

When this theory was developed, it was put together with the formula first.  All the attempts at coming up with a justification for the observed formula, i.e. a formula that fit the observations, came from an analysis of the math to determine features of the formula and to explain other observed features.

The argument of the theory is that the universe generally works the way we need it to because the "net" sequential changes are small in large regions between the two vibrational options. The universe does not have an even vibration, but it does have an approximately stable vibration.

When we step back and look at the larger effects over time, as by examining a spiral galaxy, we see the universe pulling the knotted ball apart and the galaxies reflect that by coming apart as spirals.

We look at the less extensive changes, we see relatively stable orbits and when we drill down to the molecular, we see even more stable states, but overall there is currently a net unwinding which will last for 7 billion years or so.

When the net reverses, it will not be unlike what we see at present locally, only more so, some changes like a ct6 state may largely be invisible to us except as a large gravitational effect.

If you are impatient Please see the author's Amazon page at: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn and the author's Facebook page for more links (only book 3 is fully up to date although books 7 and 8 cover the theory in connection with the standard model) and articles at https://www.facebook.com/frzmn1 or @frzmn1 which include the blog which has 5 years of development of the theory is you feel like slogging through that.
Video overviews can be found on this Youtube Channel: www.youtube.com/channel/UCxK8BwhzafIi1Jd0yE8mQXQ

End Part 3

When this theory was developed, it was put together with the formula first.  All the attempts at coming up with a justification for the observed formula, i.e. a formula that fit the observations, came from an analysis of the math to determine features of the formula.
The universe generally works the way we need it to because the "net" sequential changes are small in large regions between the two vibrational options. The universe does not have an even vibration, but it does have an approximate vibration.
When we step back and look at the larger effects over time, as by examining a spiral galaxy, we see the universe pulling the knotted ball apart and the galaxies reflect that by coming apart as spirals.
We we look at the less extensive changes, we see relatively stable orbits and when we drill down to the molecular, we see even more stable states, but overall there is currently a net unwinding which will last for 7 billion years or so.
When the net reverses, it will not be unlike what we see at present locally, only more so, some changes like a ct6 state may largely be invisible to us except as a large gravitational effect.