A.
Part 4
There is a specific
model for AuT.
There are two parts
to an Algorithm Universe.
The first we have
covered. A non-dimensional mathematical
formula that creates positive and negative solutions that match observed phenomena
of expansion and contraction.
This includes both
the grand scale universe of contraction and expansion, but also orbital
observations, a vibrational element.
The second part
(and not necessarily the last) has to (1) derive from the first part (fpix), (2)
has to provide for building multiple dimensions, (3) has to have a logical
basis and (4) has to match observed phenomena.
We showed how fpix
could go to a series of number defined by adding prior solutions. One model which follows this is the Fibonacci
sequence which operates according to the building of solutions based on prior
solutions. Fibonacci numbers therefore
meet the first test.
The building of
dimension, the second part of the equation is a little more complicated. The way that AuT handles this problem is
with place. When we count in base 10 every
time we get to 10 we create a new place.
Then 10^2 gets us to the next place,10^3 to a third, and so on.
The universe is
based on information theory which is built into -1^n, the primary building
block of ct1 (space) fpix solution and hence instead of 10^x we use a different
base, base 2^n.
There are multiple
ways to combine the Fibonacci series and place, the one that seems to work the
best if f(n)^(2^n). For reasons that are
not entirely clear on first blush 2f(n)^2^n works better, getting rid of odd
values of f(n) that can create problems.
This creates a
superficially simple count where every time you get to (2f(n)^(2^n) you create
a new place.
It is superficially
simple because the fpix underlying solution means that the count is constantly
shifting in both direction. 1,2,3,2,3,4,3, for example.
At low values of n,
this effect is more pronounced.
The place portion
of this equation (2^n) creates a series of mathematical ‘arms’ called
information arms or compression arms which load up with matching solutions in
order to create the transitional states we observe. In the case of photons, for example, there
are 2^2 or 4 information arms. Using
2(f(n) you get 2^2 for the Fibonacci part raised to the 4th power
which yields 256 (4^4=256) which matches the 256:27 ratio discussed in moving
from pi(-1) to pi(1).
This has now taken
us to the logic part, the third requirement for the formula.
Our universe is an information-based
universe with positive and negative states which attract in an attempt return
to a neutral state.
It is important the
understand what this “matching of positive and negative fpix solutions”
according to this ratio (256:27) means.
It means that we are taking a series of solutions of increasing length
and folding them together mathematically to create a first dimension. The
information arms mean that there are essentially 4 folds in going from space to
photons, four folds in going from a non-dimensional state to a single
dimensional state.
We then repeat the process
adding a place as the matched solutions increase, adding another set of folds. Fortunately for us, the Fibonacci (or F)
series allows for place to be created
in this manner.
How about that 27 in the ratio?
That turns out to be important, as it represents the number of
“unmatched” states that can exist within a matched solution. At the ct1(space)
to ct2 (photon) state, this is the amount of space that can be trapped in the
folds.
You have correctly
surmised that this means that if we look long enough we can see space and
photons transition and you are right. We
do observe this, constantly, although until we discuss time, it is useless to
try to explain how, so we’ll table that part of the discussion till later.
For now, we have
developed a logical, new way of counting quantities of f(n) (instead of 1’s) to
a count of 2^n to yield place. It takes a while to get used to this, but its
just counting where the 1’s place is counting 2’s; f(n) for n=1: the 2’s place
is counting 4’s; f(n) for n=2: and so on. For each place, you have to count
with a different number. The place count
is basically 2^n instead of 10^n so that isn’t so difficult to conceptualize. While this may look a little complicated,
we’re creating mathematical dimensions based on a memorized base equation fpix.
The ratios created
are the ratio of the next lower place to the next higher place.
If you’re getting a
little lost, take a look at the charts.
The 4th
leg, the observations, is the next part of the analysis.
(4) The final phase
is matching this formula to observations.
The rest of the discussion of AuT covers this, matching the AuT math
formula to observations; but it is wrong to skip this entirely, so let’s look
at a sample of how this matches observations.
We have already covered one of these. The matching of observed ratios of
curvature to the first dimensional count.
A second comes from
the relative force of gravity to the strong force, but we’ll get to that later
and as a matter of proof it has a lot to be desired.
A third comes at
the matter-energy interface (the ct3 (energy) to ct4 (matter) interface). We all know that e=mc^2 sort of. This is a scale equation, 1 matter = so much
energy. The scale is 10^16. Using the 2f(n)^2^n for n=4 you get the
proper scale for this transition.
A similar scale is
observed at the ct4-ct5 interface of 16^32 for black hole minimum observed size
although this is a more complicated analysis. You can see this scale of
“neutrons” to “minimum size black hole” which assumes the minimum size black
hole is between a neutron star weight and the observed minimum size of a black
hole. If you are wondering what happens
to the tiny sized black holes that the standard model conceptualizes, the answer
is that they simply do not exist, they cannot exist, not even for a fraction of
a second. Does this mean that we only
observe black hole phenomena from a distance?
The answer is a surprising no. It
turns out that what we call molecular interaction, that “strong force” referred
to previously, is actually the loading of the first arms of black hole (ct5)
with matter (ct4) states. That, however, is for a later discussion also.
Perhaps the most
important of the observed phenomena is the co-existence of dimensions and the ramifications
of this to the so-called mysteries of the universe like wave particle duality, time
dilation, the big bang and other things which the standard model has trouble
with.
We’ve already shown
what the constant transitions (due to fpix transitions from positive to
negative at staggered rates) destroy the otherwise symmetrical relationships
defined by the math formula which explains the imperfect symmetry of the
universe. We’ve also shown what black
holes are, suggested the big bang was nothing but a net inflection point of the
fpix solutions, although we have not discussed it in detail. Very soon, we’re going to use this to explain
time, duality and dilation.
Pre-AuT Physics has a problem with approximate
symmetry. The standard model cannot explain why approximate and not
perfect symmetry occurs.
AuT requires approximate symmetry due to both a vibrational
and unbalanced compressing vs decompressing states. Each quantum point
having a slightly different fpix clock ensures that absolute symmetry is
impossible. AuT has a place for the findings of the standard model, but
not the standard model itself. The place is in the transitional states.
The quantum moments of the universe mean that force and
time do not function in the way taught by the standard model, but over values
of x, the change in information arms (compression) yields the transitional
features viewed by the standard model.
Our existence, our forces and histories are the "net
unwinding" of black holes (ct5). AuT in an expansion period slowly
bleeds ct1 from the more compressed states.
It should be possible to
predict how it will absorb ct1 in the reverse direction, indeed we are in a
pocket of net absorption, net anti-entropy, but the universe as a whole is
entropic.
The standard model fails the Parmenides test. The
Parmenides test is that the universe cannot be infinitely divisible.
AuT deals with this with quantum space as information
states.
The view of spiral arms is because as we tear apart
compressed space, we are tearing it down from one Fibonacci state to the next
and this means it tears in a spiral shape. The larger the sample, the
closer we get to a curved perfect spiral. For that reason, entire
galaxies form statistical models, by and large. A more balanced galaxy
appears more spherical, but as it eventually tears down it will go spiral just
as a spiral galaxy in a compression phase should become more spherical.
Left and right have less to do with aut in symmetry because
left and right require more dimensions than aut requires for an analysis.
To accomplish this, the model has non dimensional and
dimensional solutions. The non-dimensional solutions, -1^x and fpix are
below thermodynamics. The dimensional solutions, 2f(x)^2^x define
thermodynamics.
End part 4
If
you are impatient Please see the author's Amazon page at: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn and
the author's Facebook page for more links (only book 3 is fully up to date
although books 7 and 8 cover the theory in connection with the standard model) and
articles at https://www.facebook.com/frzmn1 or
@frzmn1 which include the blog which has 5 years of development of the theory
is you feel like slogging through that.
Video overviews can be found on this Youtube Channel: www.youtube.com/channel/UCxK8BwhzafIi1Jd0yE8mQXQ
Video overviews can be found on this Youtube Channel: www.youtube.com/channel/UCxK8BwhzafIi1Jd0yE8mQXQ
No comments:
Post a Comment