Post 1. Physics

2500 yards yesterday, all you can comfortably do now that May is the hottest on record.

I'm doing a series on the physics facebook page "discussion".  I haven't gotten onto physics world (and haven't even tried physics group yet) approval, but I'm pursuing it as if I will.

While I have other posts on symmetry that need to go up, I thought I'd share with you these posts for your comment.

I have more to say, but I am also running behind on everything.  I really need to be speaking in person.  No one is stopping me, right? 

Anyway, you don't care about any of that.

Part 1:

          I would like to attack time first, but it is necessary to accurately define dimension in order to deal with time.  I am offering this as part of a “discussion of physics,” not dogma, so feel free to take this lightly, or ignore it all together.  It will be true or false whatever I write and whatever you read.  The videos are a couple of hours long altogether and Rome wasn’t built in a day, so be patient with me if you decide to participate in the discussion.

          Let me start with something that is so intuitive that few believe it.

          Space and matter are the same thing.  If you do not already believe this, I hope to prove it to your satisfaction. 

We “see” the conversion from space to matter via the intermediary states every day, and this ties in to the wave particle duality; and can be used to show what the big bang is, and what it is not.

First, we need to talk about the several individual dimensions that coexist and make up the universe.  Space exists with no dimension.  Photons exist with only one regardless of whether we experience 3 dimensions or not.   Black holes exist in 4 dimensions.  Where does that leave us?  Waves exist in two dimension and matter in 3.  I save this last sentence for last, because this is NOT inconsistent with the standard model.  The standard model recognizes that waves act as if they only exist in two dimensions and well it should!

Time, well time has nothing directly to do with dimension which I will discuss in a subsequent post when I will attempt to show to your satisfaction exactly what time is via a discussion of time dilation (gravitational and velocity).

          Eliminating the old view of time will clear up a lot of things, but first we need a new view of dimension.  There is, as evidenced by gravity, a linear and non-linear component to dimension.  This distinction is the source of the distinction between gravity/antigravity and the other forces.  Gravity and anti-gravity (darkenergy) are the results of dimension coming into existence and vanishing at this level.

          Let’s go back to the beginning in terms of mathematics.

          Why is pi?  We know what is pi, well, we will in a minute, but why pi? 

          Fpix (the denominator of pi) is defined by this equation: ([-1^x plus 2x(-1)^x-1]) as x varies from 1 to infinity.  You’ll see a lot of this equation.  The differentiation in points (the universe exists as an ever-expanding number of these points) is because of the count. -1,1,-3,5,-7,9.  The -1 is a special case for another day.  This means that in 3 changes in x; the -3 changes to 5, after 5 pulses the 5 changes to -7 and so on.  It is likely that at each change in x another -3 is generated again.  The effect is to generate net changes between positive and negative over progressively longer numbers of x changes, it’s a lot like a growing sin wave with inflection points, this is important.  The highest values of fpix at the present state of the universe are on the scale of 10^100 and since there are 10^44 changes in x for every second (at least if you have any seconds) the half-lives of some of these fpix solutions exceed the period of expansion and contraction and re-expansion of the universe (60 billion years and change at this stage of the universe, this is constantly changing as new -3 results are generated).  Some of the -3 results change so quickly, 3/10^44^th of a second, that they serve little purpose in considering seconds, but these are at the edges of the universe, so they don’t matter so much to us.

          You may have recently read that at the “center” of the universe there are a bunch of black holes.  This 10^100 transition rate is the reason, those black holes are changing state really, really slow.  We are in the middle area of the universe, rate change wise.

          The really slow, really fast and middle speed changes are all bunched up.  How and why?  The universe starts with this non-dimensional “string” of solutions separated by solution order.  When it folds (and it really folds a lot, the scale is of the magnitude of 10^60) it traps a lot of free space.  It also traps photons, waves and matter.  When it unfolds, all these states are knotted up and they pull the knots as they go from 4 dimensions down toward 0 dimensions and this pulling is what you call velocity. The rate change of this pulling (and pushing as it rewinds) is acceleration.  Do you see it yet?  Why does everything orbit in a curve?  We’ll get to that.

The numerator of pi is usually given as 4 but it isn’t always 4.  Indeed, it likely exists as -1, but it certainly exists as 1,2,3 and 5 in addition to 4 and you probably guessed this is the case.  Right now, it exists as all these numbers.  It also represents “place” in a special series, but we will get to that in another post.

          There are probably 27,000 physicists working on particle accelerators alone and if this theory is accepted, they are largely wasting their time.  That’s a big pill to swallow and I don’t expect you to swallow it.  This is a theory; and, among physicists, theories are like gallbladders, most of us had one at some point in time.

          For the moment, all I want you to consider is the possibility that the derivation of pi is based on some underlying logic and that the values of pi; fpix for the denominator and 4 for the numerator arise from some logical underlying feature and ask yourself, “what is that feature, if not the number of dimensions of each of the states making up the universe?”

          Now you want to insist you are moving through space in 3 dimensions and you are right, sort of. 

Movement in 3 dimensions through a non-dimensional space is possible because space is the same thing as matter.  Let’s move back a few dimensions.  If you fold space just right, by matching those positive and negative solutions of fpix, space folds into one dimensional photons, just like energy folds into matter.  You also trap some unfolded space into the folds of photons, but we’ll get to that later.

If you fold photons, obviously you get two dimensional waves.  If you fold waves just right, yes you have it, you get matter, actually neutrons, because protons and electrons are partially folded waves.  We’ll get really specific as to how that folding happens, by the by.

However, no matter how much you fold it, space remains without dimension, photons exist with only one, waves with two, and so on and you also go from one numerator of pi to the next, but it’s always 1 for space, 2 for photons, 3 for waves, 4 for neutrons and 5 for black holes.

Since space is trapped in these folds, you can see that as you compress space, things tighten up and space expands because you release the trapped non-dimensional space from these folds.  Because the first fold is from non-dimensional space to dimensional photons, you generate gravity when you fold and anti-gravity (dark energy) when you unfold.   Why?  Because the definition of gravity is pulling towards the folding and anti-gravity is unfolding. 

What is the big bang?  It is the point where the net folding for the whole universe is outweighed by the net unfolding at an inflection point.  In 7 billion years, give or take, we’ll have a net anti-big bang.

You are not convinced yet, but we are just getting started.

If you are impatient Please see the author's Amazon page at: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn and the author's Facebook page for more links (only book 3 is fully up to date although books 7 and 8 cover the theory in connection with the standard model) and articles at https://www.facebook.com/frzmn1 or @frzmn1 which include the blog which has 5 years of development of the theory is you feel like slogging through that.
Video overviews can be found on this Youtube Channel: www.youtube.com/channel/UCxK8BwhzafIi1Jd0yE8mQXQ

The videos are surprisingly up to date, the one on  compression deals with how the folding occurs in detail.

End of post 1.