369 9 15 22: Mein Kampf: Electrons and photons and "real" sub-atomic particles

I have had trouble controlling my thoughts.

Today I had a bike ride in the sun of the day.

It was not so hard, but it was hard for me, and I did outside weights, using my sun soaked, hardened but badly aged body.

But my sun is gone, you have no idea how I suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.

How much I suffer the absence of you, my sun.

So much is happening, it is impossible to set it all out, to attempt to do so would be impossible.

If only I could speak to you, if only I could hear your voice or even your thoughts.

Well Mein Kampf is probably taking it a little too far, but here is where the close minded mainstream science press is where they only support their own:

https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/deep-space/a34934990/new-universe-theory-fragments-energy/

When I say we’re 7 years ahead of everyone else, it sounds pompous, but when you see article like this: https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/deep-space/a34934990/new-universe-theory-fragments-energy/ you see where the published state of the art is, basically where AuT was in 2012 or 13. They have the right idea, but not the actual math model.  It’s a little frustrating because we have peer review articles from late 2018 that cover these issues.

 

This “theory” was actually extensively modeled beginning in 2012.  Published peer review articles, as early as 2018)  can be found here:

The old version of the science is set out  in an audio book (7 hours) from 2019:

 https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07PT9M459.  Other print version books can be found on Amazon dating back to 2012.

 

 The most recent articles from 2019 can be viewed here https://nessapublishers.com/view-article.php?id=344/Space-as-the-building-block-of-dimension-An-applied-overview

or
https://www.opastonline.com/current-issue-atcp

or

https://innovationinfo.org/Scholar-Journal-of-Applied-Sciences-and-Research/article/Space-as-the-Building-Block-of-Dimension-An-Applied-Overview#pdfNew 

Fractal Geometry Leading to The Periodic Table; Application of

Algorithm Dimensional Model to Large Scale Phenomena

Gregory M. Friedlander

 https://www.redelve.com/backend/images/article/1556351864.pdf 

.The only slight of out of date original article: s can be found here:

1.    https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/algorithm-model-defining-dimensional-features-2090-0902-1000290-105480.html 

The difference between the theory you published and the actual model is that a model is a mathematical interpretation, whereas a theory is just a concept.

There is more nonsense like this, more that is old and proof only of how far advanced AuT is over other models.

Vox.com: Why physicists really, really want to find a new subatomic particle. http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIwxc6ckS4

Forbes: Ask Ethan: What Is An Electron?. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2019/04/06/ask-ethan-what-is-an-electron/

And complete nonsense:

http://3tags.org/article/latest-lhc-experiment-marks-significant-milestone-in-search-for-magnetic-monopoles

Except for the fact that now that I think about it, I have actually found such a conceptual piece of the puzzle.  How very odd that what was once nonsense is now something, after a fashion.