disappointing posts and pending work

I noted that I have 171 posts that need to be edited right now and perhaps 200 pages of the third edition to edit.  I had a writing set back recently which I was neither expecting, nor particularly concerned about but it had a deeper impact that I suspected it would.
Today I finished the second large time sensitive project that waited for me.  That leaves one more which, thanks to a mostly working weekend (and staying out of the rain) I have made a substantial start on.  I dare say that I could finish it tomorrow if I work effectively and I plan to work on it some this evening.  I took off early today and swam under a threatening sky, but low I had been in the chilly water and under the chilly sky but for a short time when the clouds suddenly disappeared, the sun came out and I enjoyed a wonderful, coldly refreshing nearly 3000 yard swim.  It compared well to the damp morning, for I woke at 5:00 am and, distraught over the way things were going could not recapture sleep, so I dutifully took the dog walking.  It was interesting because as 5:30 rolled around there were sorts of life in the pre-morning drizzle.  Bike riders who could only race on the pre-dawn empty streets, a jogger seen at a distance, one lone person and two together who seemed to be under-dressed for a walk to the gym.  And on the golf course, were three sets of cart lights where maintenance before the dawn was occurring.  I was able to avoid 2 altogether, the third past close enough for the driver to give a not-unpleasant acknowledgement, he was on the phone or radio at the same time.  My shoes were wet and I was covered with a mist and sweat and hot before I got back, too melancholy to be tired.
After the hard day, the cold water initially a shock was refreshing
And I worked hard, disposed of another project, had lunch with a friend, did all the minor things that I needed to do before what will be a long day tomorrow.  But where was I...
These posts have to be pretty disappointing. Perhaps if things go well, I will be able to get back to physics over the weekend.  That's my current plan, but it means finishing the last big project over the next two days and even then trying to put a huge amount of past work into perspective and to tackle the issue of perpetual motion (not) in a circular universe of the type described by the spiral model of NLC (the trick is that NLC is stationary so there is no motion, lol) will take some doing and perhaps most of the weekend will be engaged in just getting ready for the next posts.
I thought you'd like the coffee cup post more.  I thought it was one of my better posts.  It wasn't earth shattering or inventive or in further pursuit of my fiction, but it was from the heart and to you.  Perhaps it wasn't as good as I thought it was, my work rarely is.
In point of fact, I think I could have done a better job on the project I got out today, but who can't do something better than the did.  And it truth I believe I did what needed to be done and more.  If I'm right, then it will succeed despite its inadequacies.  If I'm wrong, then perhaps the additional work would have made no difference.  It is gone, what happens next will take care of itself.  I made an unusual proposal when it was done because of the cost, but it is more than I'll say here, because it speaks to something about me that I cannot understand.  I am, myself, a chipped cup.
So, on to the third project, there are only a few days left for it, but perhaps this evening and tomorrow will do for it.

launching ships

It may be the weather
that makes me think about you
both forces of nature
you who has the face
of Helen of Troy
such inner strength
I have tried so very hard
to turn my heart away
but it claws me
from the inside
to tear its way out
as if it thinks
it could reach you
without me
that it could sing
the songs written to you
or recite the poetry
that you inspired
or to teach the physics
that I stole from you
and your friend Parmenides
but you were newton's orchard
you who embody love
of so many lost lives
like so many nights
today I drink my coffee
from my one little cup
late yesterday I swam
as I moved through the water
i watched the tropical system
taking the sky in curves
bringing who knows what havoc
to wreck whatever is left
after you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTQbiNvZqaY

True to the first, true to the last

Are you are real thing or just an illusion to me.
Is that too much to ask?
Of all the questions
was it just my feelings
what were yours
why does it have to be all or nothing
You may not owe me anything in reality
but indirectly there is a debt there
didn't you, whether by accident or on purpose
ruin every relationship that I ever had
And you would know as well as me
that many of those were very good
and not because of me
only because of those with whom
i shared my life for a while
or perhaps my bed
I'm afraid I bring very little
Like a monster I draw my life
from those around me
it's not on purpose,
it like what you did, but there it is
didn't i draw the most power from you
my repayment for when you reached down to me
and saved me from drowning
wasn't it to pull you under
as I clawed my own way to the surface
for one last coughing, gagging breath
was it really worth it to take you with me
if only you'd learned the right way
to save a drowning man
you have to pretend to let him pull you down
till he releases you
and you can swim to the surface
with or without him
but for me it feels different
I think my feelings are far too strong
whether real or false to save us both
so perhaps it has to be
what you have said
what it seems that everyone has always said
why is it that way with me
all or nothing, and always nothing
if I cannot do what I want to do
what did all that means
and if not that
can't you answer the one question
was it real or just my imagination
just me or you too
the question I'm always left asking
always left unanswered
if it all seems real to me
but if I'm right and it is real
afterwards why can't we be friends

Seriously, I just heard that song today in a store
the rest of the post is just a set up for using the song
true, it is, but its still just a set up
however well it seems to fit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7Zk90TygnE

a perspective on coffee cups

I am alone today which is nice.
I have my big project which I can't expect to finish in one day ahead of me, so I'm not sure whether I'll go to my community service or not.  While I have till the 7th of next month, I want to have at least a version of it ready to go by Monday.  Community service shouldn't suffer, I suppose, but I suspect someone will cover for me and last weekend I brought donuts, so there should be enough good will stored up in empty calories to satisfy everyone.
I'm savoring my small cup of coffee with its picture of a farm in winter, in the background a hill with evergreens, the farm buildings red and separated by a fresh deep snow that speaks to a certain loneliness, but it is a place where one can imagine, the chimneys not yet smoking, that two people are in bed together, clinging to each other for warmth.  At some point in time, they will be the first to wake up on this farm and they will make coffee and drink very small portions from small porcelain cups as the kindling begins to start the winter dried logs burning, warming them before breakfast and putting on snow shoes or cross country skis and going to woods to see what else the snow has brought.
For a long time, I joined the throngs, in my new found comfort, wealth is the wrong word and is fleetingly given under any circumstance, who took huge cups of coffee that obliterated the morning with their caffeine jolts.  I think I would be happier talking to you about finding a place where we could live the scene on our cups as we drank out small portions of coffee, sleep deprived, bed tousled, content in a moment that a small cup could hold forever, if we only knew how.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNQdfHU7Vws

unpublished

It may be till October 7 before I have time to really concentrate again on the physics and I'll have to get back up to speed in order to do the editing.  There are several nearly fully edited, but fairly complex unpublished works.  If I was getting the cooperation I needed, I'd have at least one project off my desk, but instead it is dragging everything else to a halt.  The good news is that I was able to swim through the cold that I almost had.

I've been watching really old movies, from back when they were sponsored by specific companies and they called the shows "plays" instead of movies or shorts, they had acts instead of commercial breaks, everything is in black and white and a ten dollar bill is too large to make change and a person holding one is considered a big shot, a sandwich is ten cents and people make calls from phone booths.
I had a dream, it was blues and blacks.  There was a cliff I was climbing on top of, but not a normal cliff, but one made of small stones stacked on top of each other and it was beside the door to a hotel or something, so if you climbed down you'd be at the drive up.  Someone was up there with me and before climbing down was using loose hand holds but when I try to climb down with the other person, the hand holds all come loose.
I have continued to swim every day, through sickness and health; I've limited myself to a tiny china cup of coffee every day, and I try to sleep.  And I wake up really early.  today, before a meeting, after a long drive to it, I felt the sense of unreality associated with the inner ear problem, knowing where I was but feeling separate from the place at the same time.
Knowing it might make it worse, knowing that I started too late today, still I swam, till I was exhausted.
So I have to try to get my project done this weekend, as much as I can, so maybe with everything else I can finish it next week and if not then, by the end of the week.  A heck of a way to spend the weekend.  And nothing about physics, what I really need to be working on, nothing about that, nothing, but maybe tomorrow, maybe if I get enough done, maybe if I get some cooperation, I'll be able to take some time for physics.

And there are other things that are important and some of them more pressing than anything that I have.  Walruses seem to be a big part of my life right now.
I Am the Walrus: What 35000 Walruses Tell Us About Our Future in Warming World - Huffington Post http://tinyurl.com/qan2oyj shared via www.newshog.co

fighting

I was getting sick today but decided to fight through the exhaustion and swim anyway.  It helped, although perhaps now it will be worse than before; curing both the exhaustion and at least putting off the sick.  I've treated it with ear drops, strangely effective.  I ate with someone the other day who talked to me of alternative medicine doctors who evaluated a patients health through the look of their iris and somehow pictured the opening scenes of the wizard of oz, before the tornado.
I have been working feverishly, though without a fever yet; but doing almost nothing on the physics which I want so badly to finish before I loose the gist of things.  I have a publication date I have to keep and have deadlines in 7 days, in two weeks and those of this week all demanding my time.  I can only do so much I tell each of them in turn.
I have been forced, by requirements of others, to do things that created incredible stress for me for I hate in a world defined by fixed event to force others to look at their own ethical shortcomings, but I have done it because I had to.  6 days of constant work, another day, perhaps two ahead of me, though I've done most of what I can do.
I haven't had time to record the dreams, which though not as satisfyingly weird as the last one I wrote about were still noteworthy.
I wallowed at 5am in the bathtub like a walrus, the tension too extreme for me to sleep, too exhausted to wake up.
My solution to coffee has worked fairly poorly but it is the best I have been able to come up with on short notice.  Without any sleep to speak of, I need something to start my brain in the morning.  I have a tiny china cup at my office, quite english in appearance with a country scene in the design, that I fill with coffee and drink no more than it holds.  It is much like telling a heroine addict that he can have a small dose of heroine in the morning but nothing more.  It is no wonder I am sickly and exhausted.  In this the cold water of fall does me good, for the only way I can swim is to use my lunch hour when the sun provides a little extra warmth.  When the clouds pass over, the water cools noticeably and it appears it will only get worse.
But I am a water person, it is only the water and the hard swims that allow me maintain any equilibrium.  It is only the cold that allows me to stay awake in the absence of caffeine which I have done too much of to continue.  I have to chose between health of the body and fighting off anxiety and pain and loneliness by swimming myself to death as long as possible.
I am fighting.  I am...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WU4uaKgCQ9A

the fights of summer and virtual particles in NLC

Tonight's post was supposed to cover the issue of virtual particles (those represented only by a positive and negative) which seek each other out being a motive force in the intersecting spiral framework of NLC.  In this embodiment, I was going to point out how "reverse spinning" spirals matched the positive and negative aspects.  In this case, however, destruction was replaced with reversing the spin, as it were.
It's a complicated analysis, however, because the issue of these two systems being drawn together requires some force that translates well to the intersection of the spirals.  Gravity works well in this formulation, but the virtual particle analysis suggests some additional feature, perhaps and anti-spin gravity matching the spin gravity we experience.  It is worthwhile in this discussion to note the spiral nature of gravity's attraction, that logarithmic spirals are defined by the motion of one body towards non-linearity; a comparison which was already made for other purposes.
However, I have had too much coffee today and I am sick from it.  Today was the first day it was too cold for me to swim, partially the effects of the coffee and a late time getting home along with rain which means there was no way for me to burn off the effects and I find myself too irritable to be around with a caffeine headache and no chance of sleeping tonight.
The summer fights to hold on, temperatures now only occasionally creeping over the 90's.  It is growing cold, too soon I'll be deprived of the solitary swims that define my loose grip on sanity, I have to be ready to lose it completely.
The profession that chose me, rather than my chosen profession has kept me from editing the posts from last week which saddens me since I may not, for some time pick up where I left off.
I've needed a massage for some time because I've been swimming without a break, no matter what other work I'm doing, fighting exhaustion with exhaustion.
I have thought hard about manipulation, the sacrifices I have made and make every day.  I cringed, faced with someone who knelt before me with tears, begging for the impossible from a heart that  promised itself to someone else, without even asking my permission.  I have nothing to offer but treachery to everyone, including myself.
I'm not healthy enough to trouble over right now.  My mind and my body tonight wait for the lights to go out to betray me.

x NLC-time orbits after the application of Fibonacci F-series part 5 spiral math

For those of you hoping you were done with these (or perhaps that I was done) I apologize.  I have been dealing with a rather intellectual, unpleasant task of dealing with a modern example of gaslighting and the ethical ramifications associated with it.  In my writings to date, I have not yet used the term "gas lighting" but plan to do so even though it may be a bit offensive to the "gas lighter" or alleged gas lighter perhaps.
I have also continued to push myself far beyond what is healthy, in particular swimming in a pool with dangerous levels of chlorine because if I stop I fear that I will go insane.  The treatment of my own problems this way has an end.  I could feel the tendons in my shoulders trying to give out from overuse yesterday and I was so exhausted when I went to sleep that I wondered if I would wake up again.  Still the dreams came, in this case a strange insect bite that festered dramatically in a green lawn that began in a surprisingly verdant las vegas median, and a burning house with ramifications that I cannot recall this clearly this morning but which meant much to me last night as my dream self pondered the fact that I would survive the flames despite losing everything in the house which was so dear to me.
I am mindful of the slimy outer skin of the algae which I am trying to hard to kill right now which has to be brushed away so that it doesn't form an impenetrable barrier to the chlorine which is killing both of us and the slimy layer that I have in my own life to protect me.  Perhaps the fires of my dreams will burn it away, leaving us both exposed, me and the relatively innocent algae.
On swimming, i was forced to use one arm to brace the shoulder of the other until the flow of warm blood overcame the cold of the water sufficiently to allow the protesting arm to move on its own against the warning pain of the overused sinews.  How long, I wonder, before they finally give out completely and I am forced by inactivity and the inability to exhaust my emotions to face the personal demons that beg for my attention and the failures and bad decisions that ask me to face them and not look away as I force myself headlong into whatever oblivion I can manufacture and hope for something that seems farther away every day that might save me.
.
This discussion of spirals is 90% done, but the spirals themselves are more than 10% done, at least taking into account exponential growth.  To understand this better, let's assume that 10% of the mass necessary to reverse the expansion of the universe has been found.  Remember that for the spiral theory to have relevance we have to have a universe that is contracting to a single data point.  While any part of the spiral remains visible, we are assuming that at any point, the effects of the algorithms apply and the primary algorithm is the effect of two opposite spirals.  The exact number of spirals will be briefly treated in this post and the number will correspond to the number of data points at any quantum moment in the universe which is, in math terms, a bunch of spirals.
The main two spirals are "carriers" for the other spirals.  These other spirals are can be viewed as either single spirals or exponentially compressed spirals of the higher clock times turning either "clockwise" or "counterclockwise" depending on whether they are part of the outgoing or ingoing spiral.
In this analysis the first outgoing spiral (fos, lol) would have a single spiral coming off of it for each ct1 state and would be moving outward.  For the sake of distinguishing, the spirals coming off of the first spiral are called clockwise (cw) spirals and upon meeting the last incoming spiral (lis) at the outer link would, over the course of 55% of the intersection, "reverse" the spin of the intersected portion of the lis which would be the first spirals picked up by the fos.  This process would be repeated for subsequent interactions, with the caveate that exponential numbers of spirals off of these secondary spirals would represent the higher clock times.
The ccw spirals are "invisible" to us and supply the missing gravity in this analysis which indicates that we have gone 10% into the spiral (using the 10% visible math model).  Otherwise, the missing data (mass) could be hidden in the higher states (ct6, etc).  In this case, if we're assuming 10% of the mass is available in a visible form to us, then we only have 90% of the mass hidden in ccw spirals which makes us much further along in the process of compression than estimated earlier which is why the spirals on top of spirals are necessary to explain the quantity of  missing data necessary in this mode to define the entire universe at a quantum point.
One can, in this model, imagine an apparently empty fos space because there is almost no visible gravity and the expansion model that we observe confirms this.  It's large outer diameter reflects the lack of gravity visible to begin the process of compression that brings it back to the point of origin.
Spirals off of spirals suggests that they are all spiraling in same direction on the spiral, but the opposite moving spiral suggests it would have mirror image features and at intersection the one running in opposite direction must take these reverse rotating spirals and turn them towards the same direction
Spirals on spirals on spirals is suggested by the number of compression states we see.  How many can go off of any one spiral is uncertain except it may be same number as in the original lis (the outer, most compressed state of the inner moving spiral immediately before it first impacts the first inward moving spiral or perhaps the point immediately after it starts its outward spiral from the singularity.  This may be less than 100 if we really do have 10% of the matter in the fos leg at this time given exponential growth, etc.
More will follow as we discuss this diversion into one remotely applicable algorithm for explaining the expression and to some extent the origin of NLC.

nlc NLC-time orbits after the application of Fibonacci F-series part 4 Inward moving spirals in an expanding universe

I am a horrible person, really.  I did play a big role in building my own private hell, and for that I have what I deserve, but a better person would not have so many other souls suffering as a result, nor would the result have so little logic.  I am a little, bitter man, but of course I know more about black holes than anyone at nasa, so there's that.  Or maybe I don't.  For the last couple of weeks I have spent much of my time dealing with issues that are quite far removed.  They were forced on me to try to get my theory to fit into observations.  The damned black holes not fading to the same place.  That would be more easily addressed by saying it is merely perspective, perhaps blaming it on some cosmological constant like einstein and his steady state universe.  But that would be a sissy's way out; perhaps it would be right for me.  I shocked my pool and was too impatient to wait for the chlorine level to go down, so I will likely dissolve tonight and you'll have to find some other blog to follow.  The universe will again become murky, there is that.  Come hell, come for me.

I'm sure after reading the last post, some of you are questioning my fidelity.  This is unfair.  If anyone's fidelity should be in question it is yours.  There are many excuses that can be made, but excuses are like octopus arms, although I'm not sure why.
You're thinking that I cannot easily estimate the amount of force generated by the last intersection and where that leaves  us in terms of what place in a current cycle.  It's actually pretty easy to at least come up with a rough idea of how it would be interpreted in terms of current mass and the relationship to black hole or post black hole ct6 states is not particularly relevant.

It is really nothing more than determining the mass of matter that is observed in the universe which is 10% of that required for a secondary (in this case a quartenary or sequential otherwise collaspse) and we can assume that 90% of the matter therefore exists in the form of ct6 and higher.  NLC, unfortunately, assumes that space, being spread out (and possibly moving in the wrong direction in the spiral) hides much of the space.  But these are merely variables in the equation.
What we do have is a series of equations that convert specific amounts of whatever came before and we know those from the exponential compression formula.  To be specific we have to estimate how much time is moving in each of the two intersecting spirals, but what we do know is that over 55% of the intersection (in spiral theory which we're accepting for the sake of argument and not because its the solution to the algorithm driving the display of the singularity where everything happens at once) that compression of the next stage happens.  We also know the first time, that only a single strand of time is reversed and carried forward to the next intersection and that this increases by a factor of two based on the new number of dimensions carried forward on the spiral that we consider to be our time, even though it is only a distance.
Assuming that at each state there is an exponential change, we can take this mater and apply the energy equations for fusion reactions to determine a very rough approximation of how much of an explosion in terms of ct4-ct3 would result from the fusion/compression reaction for each of the states of matter and then try to match that particular explosion with what we observe.  This allows us to understand the force that led to the latest expansion of the universe.
We now have to look at our universe again.  The universe should be a spiral at the point where gravity takes over and reverses the direction.  This indicates we are still in the post explosion state which makes perfect sense as we observe the universe continuing to expand.  If you drain water through a hole, you get the same spiral you get from matter falling into a black hole, but if you set off an explosion at the hole the spiral will be disrupted.  This same process on a large scale occurs with matter falling into black holes and, presumably, with sequential big bangs.  Hence by examining the state of our universe compared to what inward moving spirals would look like we should be able to estimate where we are in the cycle of the explosion and therefore along the spiral.
Estimates say there are at least 100,000 million galaxies with an average of 100 million stars with each galaxy rotating each 1000 million years with 10,000 million years of expansion so far; but in NLC these are stagnant figures and the original rotation continues to exist in theory, the time frame that matters is the single quantum instant referred to previously.  We need to discuss the missing matter next, but for now it's important to note only that space doesn't look like it has gravity because it is spread out over not just the current big bang, but the others too.  There's just so much of it that we think it goes further than it does, but the universe has an outer limit even according to non-expanding universe theories outside of NLC and NLC must, of course, match with the accurate part of those.
"Black holes" are not that difficult to see, but they don't look like other matter so ct6 and higher states can be considered even harder to observe.
I am going to address the issues set out in the prior blog, but some things have to wait because of the problems that I face and you may or may not get more,  Tonight, instead of finishing, I'm striving not to loose my mind and I'm waiting to see if I dissolve or not.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1gLGjPFkRA

And don't we all,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGzgoSg5OZg

nlc NLC-time orbits after the application of Fibonacci F-series part 3 Inward moving spirals in an expanding universe

Allow me to rant for a while, it's little enough to ask for opening up the windows of g-space.
Why am I so far ahead of everyone else?  Yes that includes you Hawkins.  Want to make something of it?  That would be a Greek comedy, a person in a wheel chair fighting a blind man.  Could it be because you are all stuck with your own theories, clinging to them like Potolmites to the earth as the center of the universe?  You know it's not that, for my theory is built on the ruins of your work.
It has to be the suffering, me suffering more than anyone else; and that's because of you.  The universe gives me the knowledge and its unwilling to give it to anyone else.  It doesn't mean that I don't have to work for it, that is also how I'm built; but this kind of information isn't given to just anyone, its only given to someone what has given everything knowing it cannot possibly be the right choice, it has to be despair driven by irony.
And, of course, it is my desire to go back further.  All traditional theories stop at the big bang, leaving the precursors to god.  I think they are likely as not to be right, but unless Einstein was wrong, the universe is predetermined and predetermined means it already happened for all intents and purposes and that is critical to the thinking of NLC which rejects any randomness.  Rejecting randomness means not accepting ignorance, it means figuring out what happens in g-space, going back a quantum unit at a time, inferring from what we experience, come up with a methodology allowing something complex to come from nothing (I've done that, by the way, if you read the last 30 days of posts); without doing that, I'd be another physics worm, like the one i rescued, trying to explain a universe while accepting theorems, taking the math and saying that I cannot disagree with it, even though it's clear that any math of moving time, of bi-directional dimension is corrupt.  I was able to throw out rules that others were tied too.  But I was only able to do that because I rejected everything dear to me for my own false gods, those rules became "relatively" insignificant, compared to the larger rules of life that I turned my back on, even though I knew they were self evident, and know it today.
Your work left the holes there, black holes as it were, hairless but dimensional moving black holes.  Your black holes, however were the false singularities that I originally envisioned and I now understand that the measure of data comes from something far more complicated.
 I followed your mistakes, expecting a slightly different wormhole, mine required that they all led to the same place, the only place they could go under the theories of the Einstein Hologram Universe.  That failed, however, because they continued to move with the universe, so the only place under a relativistic, Einsteinian universe was closed off to them.  You wanted them to be singularities and so did I, but they had dimension and there was no solution in that.  Also, information theory dictated that they had to be part of the information system.  You were willing to allow information to be lost in black holes, I saw that there was no lost information in a universe that relies on conservation, so your information poor black holes could not exist.
The only thing left was to come up with a mechanism and that is where we're working right now.  We have a design where within what I'll call time orbits (F series orbits) you can slow down or speed up coordinates to go between the types of space that exist within that, but only at certain times are you able to skip to the next higher time state.
The rules are allowed to change (although even I take issue here) with the turns of the linear spirals to take into account the transfer of information from one state to the next so that compression can occur during these transition states in spite of the apparent lack of sufficient mass to overcome the speed of .The universe is enormous, but the basic rules of physics indicate it is finite.  The "basic" concept is that an infinite universe would collapse under its own weight, but NLC allows for an alternative even though NLC is largely based on a finite universe.  There is an alternate infinite NLC universe, you just continue the spirals forever, but there is no requirement.   It is well within the theoretical models to allow for sequential compression based "fusion" type reactions (one actually being fusion) followed by periods of explosion based expansion with one-way coordinates having relative speeds to allow for illusory self determination, illusory three dimensional movement and transition between the compression states achieved at that level of compression.
I am looking at the next post, but I am tired.  My nightmares, my nights without you, my despair awaits me.  I will sleep again without you and I will wake up and you will not be there and I will lie awake until the nightmares come and I will embrace them because the terror they hold is less than the terror we make for ourselves.

As an added bonus and because I'm too tired to take it out for tomorrow, you can find the unedited next post below.  If you want to wait for it to be edited, that's what i'd suggest, but if you want, you can glimpse deeper into this.  The next post, however, will just be an edit of this with more information on the number of spirals, the calculations of force of the sequential "fusion/compression" reactions and more information on what we can expect at the transitions which appear to be rather abrupt by the math.

Part 4

Estimates say there are at least 100,000 million galaxies with an average of 100 million stars with each galaxy rotating each 1000 million years with 10,000 million years of expansion so far; but in NLC these are stagnant figures and the original rotation continues to exist in theory, the time frame that matters is the single quantum instant referred to previously.
Some of the issues discussed here are:
1) The force outward as "compression/fusion" reactions and the fusion as the cosmological constant at ct4-ct5; that is where the NLC Intersecting F-series sequential fusion reaction to maintain expansion against the force of gravity in algorithm form against a fixed universe is explained in more detail; including the  calculation of force, which for some of the occasions is relatively easy from 1) number of intersections vs 2) total number of spirals vs 3) the e=mc^2 equation  and 4) the length of intersection and followed by a period of gliding before (perhaps) the turning inward (at 90 degrees in the case of the linear (as opposed to curving F series) reflecting the collapsing part (which would indicate we are (even though it's been a very long time) in the pre collapse, post explosion phase (ct4-5 or ct5-6(maybe)) post overlap and pre-right turn expansion on the surface of a spiral (as opposed to the balloon used traditionally as an example).
2) How each compression state is exponential
3) What if ct1 is not unique as an outward spiral-what if each sprial appears to move outward (or inward) from a certain perspective
4) How many compression states occur for each spiral
5) How to determine the size of the spiral and the number of spirals based on model and estimates of planck length (and back again)
6) the amount of force at each ct compression state (how much fusion can be calculated)
7) outward spirals forced (changing the direction of spirals) using the force of fusion one length of the intersection at a time-it is gradual, not immediate compression)
8) how compression occurs at the edge of space allows for an expanding universe to have compression without collapse, meaning that at transitions of the spiral method you can have shifts, for example force or even gravity running backwards, or outward expansion transforming into inward expansion as a result of the universe spiraling inward despite the illusion of expansion, something even traditional theories envision in an Einstein bubble;
9) how red shifting proportional to distance from us reflects the increasing size of spirals past.
 If it is finite than the limits of the universe can be determined with some certainty given a certain amount of information.  Fibonacci Spiral NLC indicates that determination is a bit easier than in other theories because it is based on specific spiral features.  Even with NLC without spiral theory, NLC provides a fixed amount of information transforming against some preset formula so that Spiral features merely provide a set of parameters for the variable portions of the equation.
The spiral compression force can be viewed as "fusion" which provides more than enough energy (given a sufficient quantity of compression) to overcome gravity (sort of like a "fusion" rocked drive but where the entire universe is the rocket.  To understand how this is possible, it helps to look at the most likely way that this compression "force" would be handled.
As was mentioned earlier, the compression occurs at each spiral to the tune of 55% of the "intersecting spirals".  What we are about to discuss is how much intersection takes place at each spiral.  Here the "compression" occurs at ct1 (even though it is presumably running in the opposite direction-we will discuss how all spirals may run in an opposite direction) to ct2, at ct2 to ct3 at ct3 to ct4 (e=mc^2), at ct4 to ct5 etc.
 size and the other almost (short 1) completely compressed and therefore moving (for example) at 170th the speed of the other suggested by the collision only increasing slightly the non-ct1 states relative to the ct1 states (we don't see 55% conversion at each step but we may see 1/170th conversion, then it might double 2/170ths  and the two would affect 55%x2 of the others as there are no two parts to the one going "the opposite way,
These alternatives are what we must apply to the observed phenomena to see if we come up with the right numbers and since at the ct5/ct4 interface we observe slightly higher compression states, if these come out at 55% higher, then perhaps we're on to something, keeping in mind that compression occurs at exponential rates because of conservation and the rate of change and the speed of the relative parts as shown by the ct3-ct4 (energy matter) conversion ratio.
The most gratifying 1 into many approach comes from the informational progression:
1 to 2, 2 intersecting next to 4, 4 to 8, 8 to 16 just as is expected from information theory.  That is a single going into many and picking up a second, these two going into many and picking up two more so that with each half spiral the compression is doubled.  The relative speed can also be taken into account, 1 moving at half the speed as it goes into two, two slowing further as they go into four, whether by friction or weight.
It is left to the fractional intersection as well as the portions of the spiral where there is no interface to either explain or refute the suggestion of acccuracy.
define the area in logarithmic spirals
There is, of course, massive amounts of missing information/mass in the traditional universe, so we have that; but NLC solves problems and doesn't cause them so we have to at least suggest some answer to the problems.
Calculating the difference between the F-spiral observed
One that was previously discussed was the amount of compression observed at the ct4-ct5 boundary (matter to black holes)  The only obvious source for the discrepancy between the expected and observed is the presence of matter (ct4 matter) within ct5.  That provides the scale necessary, but if that were the case, then why is it not "observed" in other states?  The answer could be that there is no corresponding one on one state to compare.  CT3, 2 and 1 don't appear using traditional techniques for observing gravitational effect, presumably because they are too small or too spread out or because they run in the opposite direction relative to the state we are in.  This last can happen in a number of different ways.  For example, at each point where collision occurs, at each collision where a new time orbit is possible, all the other states may go negative (they reverse direction or the don't) or they appear to run in an opposite direction relative to the next higher state.
Another problem has to do with how do we define an expanding universe in terms of a series of steadily compression spirals.  This one is actually easier to deal with because the spirals have almost nothing to do with true dimension, they are only a mechanism for defining compression or time orbits.  Further, if we'd like we could look at each separate time orbit as a new big bang as was suggested earlier.  This would mean that the last big bang (around the 5th or 6th spiral inward in my estimate) you'd be looking at 10,000 million years worth of time length in just that one spiral arm although we can also view this as 10,000 million years worth of time length over 5 or six spirals.
Expansion is actually provided for (in decreasing amounts in one case) in two separate ways..  The first, most likely has to do with expansion in the area provided for within the arc described between serials/area between; another is the possibility of an inverse relationship, yet another is that we're looking at the outside from each compression cycle.  Of course, there's also the distinct possibility that spiral theory is a red herring in defining the mechanism for the algorithm governing compression; but you can't expect everything to be answered at once and all the fish to be properly filleted when the fishermen are working for free.

the grave

I was editing the next post  which primarily covers the relationship of fusion and compression (both the same thing except one only occurs at the ct3-c4 boundary and the other occurs according to intersection NLC F theory at all boundaries) but I was suddenly overtaken by a feeling so disorienting that I decided I should write about it.  It was as if, if you outlive me, you had walked over my grave.
It was such a feeling of insecurity, not in myself or my needs, but in meeting things, that it was disorienting in the extreme, almost like the fits of nauseating inner ear imbalance that I suffer from.
Then I was up for three hours in the middle of the night follow a dream that took me to dimensions unknown and worth repeating for whatever it is worth.
It started, as near as I can remember, with me swimming with a female attorney with whom I had just successfully done some work.  I was finishing my swim and it seemed to me as if I should have impressed her, the why we ended up swimming together being lost on me.  As I was getting out of the pool, I noticed in cracks (which are not there in my pool) tube worms coming out.  I should mention that yesterday while swimming there was an earthworm squirming in the bottom of my pool and using a twig I "rescued it" from drowning (what type of person rescues a worm, I ask you).  But these tube worm were getting into the pool where the other attorney continued swimming and it made sense that I should add some chemicals to increase the chlorine level (which by coincidence needed to be done yesterday and which I've since done this morning).  However in the dream (as in reality to some extent thanks to some tenacious black spot algae the pool seemed to be getting steadily worse.  The chemical room was unusually cluttered and what I thought was the chlorine container turned into some dirty unit for spreading chlorine the size of a wwI ship mine, but much lighter, with some questionably older pieces of chlorine tab in it.  An electrician friend of mine was there being (typically) obnoxious and he started an old car tape deck playing music and I told him to stop it lest it wake me and send me out in the night looking for the source of the sound for the pool supply room had somehow moved from the far side of the pool to being a part of the house, although that would soon change.  He demurred and the conversation turned heated and I banished him from the house saying something absurd, like "henceforth you are no longer to come to my house. You are banished from my house."  I do not talk like that except, apparently, in dreams.  I found no cholorine, but suddenly found myself alone and surrounded by clutter, not just in the room which had looked like an abandoned curio wearhouse but also in the yard.  The pool had turned into several pools which were occupied by children and all manner of other people were about, but everything was filthy and I took to cleaning up and treating the pools as best I could, the task seeming to be hopeless.  The house was not seen by me, but the yard had turned large and had a high chain link fence in such disrepair that I could walk through it.  For whatever reason I did only to walk down a steep hill to where an industrial area was with some famous people attempting to do recycling amidst the disorder and debris.  I had something from the pool cleaning, I think it was sheetrock, which I held up to ask where it could be recycled; although the reply seemed uncertain and in my memory I cannot remember whether they even saw me or not.  Headed back up the hill I ran into some elderly women dressed for the kentucky derby (no one mentioned the derby) and I was embarrassed by the clutter until I realized it wasn't my home anymore.  At this point I became frantic trying to decide what I should do in this dreary, dream dark, cluttered and dirty place which apparently was not even mine to clean.
The place shifted again, this time cleaner, but like a stadium that had been carved from a single block of something, with clean buildings around it, one of which was a casino, but no people who were familiar or who looked anything like me.  At this point in time I felt guilty for having banned my friend, and feeling that this guilt might have something to do with events pulled out my phone, the light of which I had used earlier, I think now, and called him to apologize and told him my very unusual predicament even as the surroundings began to change again.  I told him I would likely never be home again and to tell my family of my hopes for their success in my absence, but even as I spoke the phone changed to a more primitive phone as even the area around me seemed to change, the phone now having no buttons at all but only stone raised features where the buttons had been, although i remained hopeful he could still hear me.
Then I noticed a cousin of mine with another, fatish, old dear male friend, even thought the surroundings had turned more primitive, now with restaurants around the outside of the stadium which was crowded.  I stopped them and asked the friend if he didn't have something for me, remembering that he owed me a wager (which oddly enough he does, even though the circumstances and amount of it render it somewhat superfluous and something which I am sure will be paid if it is the proper thing to do).  However I notice he is not fat and he has just done the census, I'm told and wears a type of full face mask and an outfit including cones mounted on his chest.  He seems very stand-off ish and I ask him about the mask which he seems perplexed that I don't understand it as if everyone finishes the census and then wears a mask,  then I ask what has happened to him to make him so skinny which seems to give him great pain and he removes some of the cones and then the clothes exposing a body cut up like the pictures you see of a cow dissected to show the various cuts of meat and something causes me to believe that in this dimension that I have found myself that I somehow caused this and the anguish is so great to me that I finally wake up.
Anyway, I wanted to share that with you.

I am going, shortly, to post the section where the NLC Intersecting F-series sequential fusion reaction to maintain expansion against the force of gravity in algorithm form against a fixed universe is explained in more detail; including the  calculation of force, which for some of the occasions is relatively easy from 1) number of intersections vs 2) total number of spirals vs 3) the e=mc^2 equation  and 4) the length of intersection and followed by a period of gliding before (perhaps) the turning inward (at 90 degrees in the case of the linear (as opposed to curving F series) reflecting the collapsing part (which would indicate we are (even though it's been a very long time) in the pre collapse, post explosion phase (ct4-5 or ct5-6(maybe)) post overlap and pre-right turn expansion on the surface of a spiral (as opposed to balloon); but you will have to wait a little while for this.  Suffice it to say for the moment that it will be posted soon assuming I don't decide to give this up or find myself in a dimension without a computer.

nlc the finite universe

Sometimes, I feel so disoriented in the morning, it is like floating.
You see, because of you, I have to swim 3000 yards a day just to get to sleep.  Don't try to blame this on me.
You probably picture me in a room with strange drawings on the walls and a desk littered with papers, the top most being Fibonacci curves and the related math formulas and you are correct.  I live in a pretty strange place, the important things are ignored, I even have to remind myself to drink coffee.  The intellectual pursuits only weakly allow me to maintain my sanity, or perhaps it is something else I'm clinging to.
needless to say, other than the ravages of old age, I have not a scrap of fat on me.  That doesn't mean that I look good or feel particularly healthy.  I am more like a skeleton, essentially bald, with a thin layer of toughened skin stretched over it in no particular fashion.
Today, for example, i had to force one of my feet to the floor, as if gravity were uncertain of its hold on me or I on it and we had to work together lest my other foot leave the floor and I float off like a balloon.
The presence of Fibonacci curves is probably less significant than the quantum 3/5 straight lines turning 90 degrees (in the same direction) along with the F series (after 3, after 5, after 8, after 13, etc.  Since we are at the outermost point on the algorithm so expressed (if you get stuck on movement, you miss the elegance of the solution) the lines are so long that they appear as straight lines, even 5% of the way in from the far exterior.  In fact, using the "digital" format suggested by quantum theory, for extremely long F-series you are travelling, not essentially in a straight line, but in an actual straight line.  If the coordinates were represented by separate F-series curves, then at these extremely low compression states, they would be made of long, straight lines. changing relative to one another.  Since we are a ct4 state and, assuming ct1 is the outward moving spiral (quantum, non-curving spiral) then you have the three cadinal dimensions represented by lines, not curves.
The number of interactions can increase rapidly depending on the direction of the second spiral outward.  The 180 degree interaction is only a function of the two curves coming off at identical mirror image angles.  The others are worth exploring.  For the moment, however, we're only going to examine the 3/5 ratio grid lines (those moving according to F series in opposite directions from a common starting point.
These "right angle" lines (turning at each F series, still overlap at the 180 degree marks, but unlike the curves which overlap at a point, the grids overlap along alternating lines.  In this way you see overlap according to a formula where the overlap is the amount of overhang (on either side) added up plus the amount of overlap for each succeeding alternate F series.
Hence for the 1-2 series you have "zero" overlap, and one quantum unit extension on either side of the zero point so that for the 3-5 (skipping 2-3 because there's no overlap) the overlap is 2.  Given the length (The F number) you can get the overhang by subtracting the F number from the overlap previously calculated. Why do we care?
Maybe we shouldn't care, but a pattern forms based on succeeding layers.  The overlap can be seen as compression in this case and, because it is a F-series, it comes out as a percentage overlap vrs compression that approaches, but never reaches, a number along the lines of 55.2786405%. This suggests a level of compression  (doubling the number of coordinates changing or increasing exponentially) at each turn of 55%  The "cumulative effect" (starting not at the center but at an extreme) is that you have compression of a little more than half of the remaining matter at each stage until you get to the very beginning (non-linearity) when the final combination is of 40% which gives us insight (if we accept this model as having any value at all) that immediately before we go to non-linearity (everything happening at once) we have 5 states going down to two as a result of compression of two very very dense clock times (ctx-2; where x is the second to last compression state and is, according to this model the total amount of information in the universe/5 going to the total amount of information in the universe divided by two; then absolute linearity before going back outward again on the ct1 spiral.)
Just to give you an idea of what this says in terms of compression (keeping in mind that compression occurs at every other F-series number and if you are looking in the opposite direction, going out around 340 spirals (170 overlaps of around 55% each) you're at the state where the compressed vrs uncompressed matter is along the scale of 2.1x10^71 vs 1.2x10^71 which is a very small part of the total amount of quantum information in the universe.  Notwithstanding that, at 5% (where we're living) you have enormous amounts of uncompressed information.  Now I know what you're thinking. This would mean that at 5% we should have 5% energy/matter/black hole and beyond stuff and the rest would be dark matter and that this represents many more than the 4-6 (super massive black holes) than we experience, but let's look at this another way and let's pick, at random, the starting point of 340 which means to get to full compression there would be a total of 170 compression states, far more than the 5 or 6 we see.
For the sake of argument, let's say that we are, therefore according to a F series at 6 of 170 steps towards non-linearity.  This translates to 3.5% of the way there which is within the range we might consider (it's close enough to the observed 5% to be worth considering).  Now some of you are asking, how much information was there before and the total amount (going out an additional 6 steps is only 3.8654x10^72.  The difference, however, has to do with how much compression takes place at each step.  Even though the maximum 1 step of compression is 2.1x10^72, the total compression over these 6 steps is around 3.3x10^72 of a starting amount of information of 3.8x10^72 bytes of information and over time the total compression is in this same range since the beginning. Not much info you say?  But now remember that at each stage of compression you have an exponential 2^n amount of processing possible and you have 2^170 stages of compression.  This gets you (conceivably anyway), over 5x10^123 bits of information possible at any quantum moment in the universe although to be sure I need to check my math.

And if you want, you can get to this massive number (ct1) by looking at this single quantum needle (the line running up the top rectangle in the drawing below) going in one direction, meeting a dead end before going to the other  like a metronome thereby creating the first step in the quantum box then going in the opposite direction.  In this way the information is built out as an algorithm which forms all the data in the universe (going out, coming back in is the opposite process, what we're calling compression).
And, of course, you want some idea of what this looks like?  A little underwhelming.

NLC-time orbits after the application of F-series part 2 Inward moving spirals in an expanding universe

Discrepancies, what discrepancies?
There are some alleged discrepancies in any theory of the universe, necessarily if it doesn't largely follow mine which has to be right in certain respects, even if not in all of them.  It is too accurate in prediction and too novel in scope to be otherwise.  The question of how the spiral equations does or does not fit in the the static universe defined notwithstanding and the nature of the spiral, whether the quantum lines or the true spiral or perhaps the two, the true spirals being limited by the mathematics of the intersecting lines.  This theory has more than its share of problems and we will address those one at a time until I get bored.
NLC provides for a static universe without the need for an einsteinian cosmological constant, but such a constant may yet be part of the overall equation.  CC is the power of dark energy that causes, in traditional physics, the expansion of the universe.  Not surprising (to those who read this) the increased acceleration observed in the universe is reflected in logarithmic spirals (as you move outward from the center, the spirals get larger, if the information content of each spiral remains constant then you are going to see some expansion, that's the nature of logarithmic spirals (as opposed to perfect achemedian spirals).
The other aspect of this is going to allow us to better estimate the number of spirals, something that I promised to do earlier.  The cosmological constant (CC) needed to offset gravity to give a relatively stable universe at "our stage of compression" is around 10^-52 m^-2 or 3x10^-122 PU (planck units).  What the intersecting spiral-NLC analysis attempts to do is replace (to some extent) this "false dark energy" to "false space time" which an actual dimensional change based on a set or fixed algorithm. The algorithm can be anything under NLC but under interesecting spiral-NLC the algorithm is the one used to generate lines which intersect using F-series calculations.  It should be noted that this is primarily a difference in "approach" as the concept remains fixed because a universe with rules and a fixed, unchanging universe are both the same for purposes of finding explanations, the difference philosophically can boil down to the presence or absence of randomness, the existence or absence of an "uncertainty principle" in quantum theory (quantum mechanics in pre NLC thinking) which will also be addressed.
The measurement of distance is potentially useful, but fortunately is not necessary to this analysis.  Instead, what we can look at is a ratio between energy density and the density requirements for a fixed universe that doesn't expand forever or collapse on itself.  This ratio for us works much better and is a function of planck length and comes out to around .69 or 69%.  It would, of course, be more satisfying if it was 61% but the numbers are close enough to make a point especially given questions about how the calculations are done and the uncertainty surrounding planck length.  What's the magic of 61%  61% is the difference (approximate and zeroing in on 61.8034% but never quite reaching there) between one F-series number and the next higher number.
In other words, in a very rough sense, the ratio between dark energy necessary to "re-expand" the universe against gravity and space density collapsing the universe is around the ratio between logarithmic numbers.  You get similar ratios analyzing the "area" of logarithmic "true" spirals and can find, for example 72% (approx) of the area within a spiral vs the area outside, and much higher numbers using a comparison of the area within succeeding spirals where overlap occurs from where it doesn't but all of these ratios are function of the basic ratio.  Does this allow us to more closely determine planck length based on logarithmic spirals?  Maybe.  The key to the theory bearing fruit is the ability to provide a specific formulation.  The use of linear (vrs curving) intersecting spirals yields a variety of ratios, not just one.   But if we have a universe which is collapsed but which at our stage of compression is not collapsed, an the ratio of "expansion" force to "collapsing force" is 69% and if we have to have an algorithm at our stage of compression that allows for a collapsing universe, but gives the appearance of expansion if we look back (towards the outer spirals) then this number should be less than 69% and more than zero and 61% works just fine.
Of course someone is approaching this from another direction (stuck in space time still) using something called scalar fields which is basically the CC but changing over time (logarithmic spirals change over "time" too).  They don't give a good mechanism, but having an algorithm in place that controls the display of information which is fixed allows for this to be "explained" at least in terms of non-g-space; remembering that without a g-space explanation we're still scratching the surface like a bunch of chickens pecking for corn on a dirt path.  But the point is that "time orbits" defined by intersecting logarithmic spirals provides a way for mass ratios (electrons and protons) to remain constant while other changes occur, in this case resulting from the number of coordinates changing at once.
The next step in the analysis of spirals is to see that it supports the approach-i.e yields-information theory (the "surprise" answer is that it does if you're willing to mess with the spirals a little within the framework we have defined) but you have to wait for that, there is work to do.

the intelligence of a dog

I went for a long walk.tonight
it was cooler, warm but with a crispness in the air
I didn't swim tonight
I won't know when to sleep tonight
I have done a pretty bad job of being alive
Even though I've done something no one else has done
Several things really
But life is a constant task, not a thing of occasional flares
when I am finished with my physics
and many years from now they are discussing it
I want them to look at it as a love letter
and not a theory of physics
I wonder which would matter more
I was badly reminded of the walks of time past
of love and betrayay of love of the consequences of both
and I saw the dog waiting for me
after the walk before it ate for me to prepare my food
the dumb obediance of the animal
and I thought of my own dumb obediance
and I realized that I had the intelligence of a dog
I had heard an advertisment today that took a line from a movie
and had it read by a different actor about the two rats that fell in cream
the one that drowned and the other that struggled until
it turned the cream into butter and climbed out
it's a great line from catch me if you can
And I survived the fall myself
I know that I know how to fight
I fought till I was able to climb out
And yet I have the intelligence of a dog.

NLC-time orbits after the application of F-series part 1

It is hard to go on.  It's not just you, although you embody futility.  It is knowing that no matter what I write, I will be surrounded by ignorance and hatred for no reason other than control and hatred.  I am not in the same position I was in before and I expect things to get better yet before they get worse, but what am I in a vacuum?  How is anyone in a vacuum?  How does I change the world?  How can you?  Does it matter at all what I come up with if it is let loose on a world where everyone is a war, unless they are running from it for no reason other than to survive for the next round of destroying cities, trees, and when it suits those involved science and love, perhaps something where I am one of the guilty parties.
So is it wrong for me to want to leave everything, to just get on a road, a dirt path, to leave everything to find what I think I had with you.  Perhaps the only thing that keeps me here, is the need to finish this third edition.
Anyway....
How do we reconcile NLC exponential growth with interacting spirals?  How does spiral theory support observed universe matter distribution?
These are issues that can be easily addressed if we are wiling to commit to a relationship between non-dimensional characteristics and algorithms with dimensional features.
The constant acceleration away from any fixed point in the universe could be argued (as it has in the past) to be a function of gravity or some feature of multi-dimensional space-time.  Alternatively, it may relate to non-linearity expressed in a linear form as gravity and movement away from a common point, but not the black hole theory of EHT.  Using spiral theory, the common "points" are the middle of the spiral and the edge.
When NLC and spiral theory put forward the possibility that the algorithm running the expression of non linearity begins at the outer (an outer) layer of a (expanding?) logarithmic spiral, a suggestion is included.
  What is the model in mathematics for that. I think it's incorrect, even though the easiest answer comes from the fact that spirals spiral around a center, so that as we look out from this center, we see things expanding out in every direction more or less equally since the outer bands.
But compression theory suggests that we're the third or fourth (visible) spiral from the outside and this provides a less ego-centric answer.
In a logarithmic spiral, an F-series spiral, the outer bands are proportionately much greater than the inner bands so that the outer portions would be most of the perceived area. This means, that if you were within these outer spirals, even if there were more than a hundred spirals yet to go, you would still see the majority of the outer spirals in the past as moving apart in a "relatively" constant way.  Consider this you're watching ships miles away from an island, all sailing between two logarithmic spiral.  While some in one direction might be moving away more quickly, except for those coming back within the nearest spirals, they are so much farther away proportionately that they seem to be moving away and continue to move away especially if the island starts to spiral in to the future logarithmically.  Yet another observed phenomena explained?  Perhaps.
One has to better understand the relationship of algorithms to the singularity, which is driving the other. How does the idea of a single set of intersecting spirals for the entire universe compare with an infinite number of spirals?
Without answering those questions yet, let's look at the other question we started out with.  How do we get to exponential compression, from logarithmic spirals?  This is really a continuation of the issue of how we interpret the fundamental spiral.
There are two ways.  The one that seems to be suggested by the origin model set out in the drawing is that there would be equal spirals passing in each direction since they come from a common point in a common process.  Equal but opposite can remain, but there is a suggestion that for purposes of how they would interact requires that we treat one of the as a large "tube" spiral of information intersecting with a singular spiral running in the other direction.  The reason?  Exponential theory.
Utilizing exponential theory, we want to see this interaction as a function of 2^n expressed gradually but quantum jumps, like that expressed in orbital changes.  We're going to stick with our 170 spirals and 340 separate lines, 170 intersections, not for any reason, but because we can use 10 or 50 or 100 but we started with 170.  We'll get to a specific number later.  Using 170 in one direction, 1 in the other AT THE OUTER EXTREMITY provides a mechanism of sorts.
We have one (ct1) intersecting with 170 (ct170), and in this model, we'll peel one off due to the intersection leaving ct2 in one direction, ct 169 in the other.  So the one spiral becomes two until they intersect again, "peeling off" two, so that we have ct3 with 10^4 intersecting with ct168.
There is an alternative view: ct1-intersecting with ct 170 yield ct2 and ct169 followed by a jump to ct2, then there is ct2 intersecting to yield ct4, then ct8 but with the characteristics of ct 1, 2, 3 given before.  There's no difference in the treatment.
The main feature that we should be concerned with at this point is that this model provides a mechanism for spiral mathematics to yield information theory.  1 to yield 2, 2 at collision to yield 4, then 8, 2^n from 1 to 170.
This also allows us to explain our ability to manipulate the relative speed of the pairs to have some limited control (by physical compression mind you) to manipulate fusion and fission and the easier job of manipulating the 4 of energy to get different results.  That is that there are a number of these spirals traveling together.  At the level at which we find ourselves, assuming my earlier calculations are correct, we have clock time 4 and there are 2 (ct2), 4 (ct3), 8(ct4) lines of data traveling together and we can slow down any one of these 4 relative to the others.  While you might argue that this flies in the face of a three dimensional universe, the truth is that each of these lines in manipulation, be divided into a forward moving and backward moving portion lowering the number of dimensions to those observed (3 plus time) but all, ultimately, moving in the same direction.
However, no matter what manipulation we can accomplish within the spiral, at no point in time are we able to accomplish what collision accomplishes, which is changing the direction of intersecting F-spirals of any of  the lines.  Perhaps the goal of NLC should be to accomplish that, to overturn the concept of a fixed universe to disprove one of the primary features of the theory.
In the next posts, we'll turn to the amount of time (%) between different spiral collisions noting it is not just the 45% halved on either side, but the prior (or subsequent depending on your direction) parallel lines leading to the prior or next collision.

Initially since we are arguing we are going in, there is an increasing amount of overlap, but if we go out, it is decreasing.  Both can exist at once because one defines the outgoing spiral and the other the in going spiral.
As you will recall, we started trying to reconcile the ct4-5 state conversion rate with what is expected by ct-4/ct3 without F-series.  By utilizing F-series, we see that we can duplicate this but we still need to show that this solves the difference between the expected 10^16 and the higher observed state of compression for black holes or we have to show the observed compression is inaccurate.

Saturday

I did my community service today and had a pretty good time at it.
I slept well, but I'm exhausted.  I've been exercising hard, for even the possibility I will see you again or the possibility that I will not, but that doesn't explain how tired I am.  It is perhaps parts age, parts despair, parts desperation, sadness and the reaction to the futility of everything I am trying to tell you.
I will shortly explain such observations as why we appear to be near the center of the universe and information theory in a colliding F-series linear spiral environment, it is the next thing, but for the moment, I need a moment to catch my breath, to be exhausted, to talk of how badly my heart hurts, especially when I am pushing myself to the limits but at any time I think of you, and I always think of you.
The cold is coming, it came on slightly tonight and I will miss you more, because I remember clinging to you for warmth and remember the sting of knowing you cling to your long line of lovers in my absence.  It matters not whether this is to spite or in spite.  The pain is of separation, not of jealousy, I reserve that for those with whom I know you share your time my jealousy.  The pain is of lost opportunity, of days that can never be recovered, of festering wounds that will never heal.
Even now i wonder if the fragile porcelain pump that is my heart won't shatter when I hit the colder water next time I swim, knowing that as the nights grow colder, so will the water.  It is not lost on me the heat that is taken out of my life and where I could have found it.
I listen to music almost randomly selected, the songs of love, of bringing together two people and two families are more than I can stand and I swim harder against them, trying to drown in the water and exercise the frustration, the humiliation, the sadness, but after I have finished, the music is off, the water dripping off of me, exhaustion causing my breath to come in ragged gasps, it is all there, everything except you.

There are issues that I need to address in my physics problem that I am able to explain, ready to get to, but not today, not tonight.   tomorrow, tomorrow I will try again.

taking a break

My community service today starts late.today so I have a few minutes of added peace.  I was up early, but the idea of delving back into even so trivial a math pursuit as the post Fibonacci numbers edits seemed too daunting, despite my interest in getting this finished and moving on to the other hobbyish pursuits.
I find myself fairly engaged by my various charitable pursuits right now and somewhat underwhelmed by the requirements of work.
I am put off by politics.  I am uncomfortable with the balance between xenophobia and responsibility.  Is Ann Coulter right?  Can we, a nation of invader immigrants really justify destroying the infrastructure of a country and then just leave the problem to everyone else in the world?  Justification is probably the wrong word.  Perhaps the Ann Coulter philosophy is can we achieve a greater world dominance by acting this way.
I think it's wrong to lump Ann Coulter in with Donald Trump.  I think that Ann actually listens to herself and I think that Trump just likes the sound of his own voice, a man after my own heart.  Still, if Fiorina doesn't manage to win the Republican ticket, I suppose I'll vote for socialism.  This doesn't mean that any of the other candidates on either side or in third parties aren't fine.  The overall philosophy of the planet needs to change, what we do here is really just a matter of our personal comfort in the short run.  Having a multi-generational view of things, I suppose we'd be best off voting a bacteria into office since we're quickly headed to a world where they will be in charge.  There is a great book I read about civilizations only lasting as long as their trees.  It focuses primarily on Island cultures, but its applicable to our world which will soon be treeless the way we're going.  At that point in time, perhaps life will not be worth living anyway so perhaps the bacteria can have it.
Would it be wrong to say that life without you is not worth living anyway?  I have felt the emptiness before of losing everything worth having, only to find that what was really worthwhile was something completely different, so perhaps there is a reason to be alive even without doing what you believe in.  Perhaps there is a certain logic to the Trump-Coulter philosophy.  Right is a matter of perspective. The ghosts of Bushes past will haunt our future, perhaps we can argue that having rejected their philosophy of bombing countries for the sake of family pride we can now reject the consequences.  Perhaps we could even go back to the days of cultural cleansing which is, after all, what our most aggressive non-chinese enemies are interested in.
It's a young man's game perhaps.  I have, by this point in my life, adopted the philosopher's view.  I want to talk about it, but I'm not sure I'm ready to actually do anything.  And that, indeed, is a more dangerous position than any of the others.  Something to ponder while I build a set for Poe.

nlc part tredici-pi, phi which big bang Part quattro

Do we need a reason to regret the time apart more, to act to find a solution more quickly?   It seems unlikely, to me.  Perhaps if there was less time than the less represented by the Fibonacci series universe, so how do we shorten it further?
The overlaps of the opposite running spirals are worth considering.  For example, it is possible that we are in a trasition between compression states, in the place on the intersecting lines (one of them anyway) after the overlap (for this discussion we'll say after the overlap of the ct6 level which, using ct1 as the outgoing spiral would be 2.5 spirals in since there are two overlapping areas for each complete 360 degrees).  In this model whether we are in a spiral within the area between transitions or in lines along the transition lines between collisions (since we don't see more compression) or within a collision (since we see at least some compression) we need to ask is there one big bang, or is there are reason to consider in the universe that compression between states only happens periodically in the universe.
We should ask what happens at each of the collision states (where two spiraling lines intersect) or do they merely represent different time orbits.
If each compression state is an actual "stretch" of time, can we still say that the big bang starts outside of the last compression state.
It remains possible in this scenario that each state appears to be outgoing from the next state, that is that ct2 appears to be outgoing from another higher state.  Perhaps we can only see so many states back and there are more outgoing states.
Which big bang, in such a case, is the big bang.  It remains possible that the big bang that we are looking at is a massive conversion that occurs periodically, in this case allowing for, perhaps, ct6 states.  In such a case, we could look at "our" universe" as being nothing more than the transition state between compression at the ct5 level (with lesser states remaining because of the 55% rule) meaning that at some point in time, long before we would expect the ctx-2, ctx-1 transitions, we could see an apocalyptic transition from ct6 as the highest compression state to ct7 (in this example).  It would, if one accepts this type of process, be possible to envision that we could calculate where we were based on the same analysis used before, but we would, after the passage of several billion years, be much closer to the end of the period of relative tranquility between the collision/overlap states.  One has to imagine what the meeting head-on of two lines would look like and how it would, in such an event, represent 55% of time in one direction followed by a F-series lower time period times 100% of more uncompressed state followed thereafter by another partial compression state approximately 1/2 of 45% of the way into the next cycle which will, appear the next stage of the compressed universe as another big bang.
These "explosive" collisions, contemplated by this potential outcome would "blow" each universe outward until the gravity of the super dense state and the reduced size (length) of the collision state would allow the successive universes to start shrinking; thereby providing a model for an expanding universe followed by a shrinking universe whether done explosively or by way of systemic changes.  In any case, the amount of "free space" showing up as separation gradually decreases as more compression occurs.
It is a compelling model, but as I've indicated, it is only one way of approaching a problem which suggests solutions, but any one approach can be given a life of its own without being the best approach.  While I am serious when I tell you that I will never move on, I am going to have to move on from here or this treatise will never be finished.  Arrivederci adesso Fibonacci.  For you, I don't know why you say goodbye, I say ciao.

nlc part dodici-pi, phi and the anti-big bang Part tre

One of the curious features of NLC in an intersecting F-series line/spiral is that the big bang now comes at the "end" of the universe instead of the "beginning."
Just like with us, there is no true beginning or end, just a series of highs and lows reflecting the amount of intellect I do or don't bring to things, you being the more constant, no, I'm just kidding, I'm more consistent.  That being said, we can ignore any part of this, the past, you can ignore the future, I can't; but there is an underlying truth and whatever that is, that is perhaps what I need to look for, more than the past, more than the present, for that will define the future.
Before I get too far into this, the F-series model leaves the possibility of "missing information."  In this view of the universe, even with 170 stages of compression (remember that puts us around 3.5% where we are today), the amount of information forming the universe is even more finite (at any quantum moment) than we'd be comfortable in a very, very big universe.  The algorithm is working with a finite amount of information which includes all times, past, present and future, but at any one point, only a certain amount of this information is selected by the algorithm and this amount remains constant.
There isn't one answer to this issue, but there are a number of possible answers. The key to the analysis is that we are talking about a "background" algorithm for "populating" a "static" universe.  Later, not now, we will deal with each of these issues together; but essentially in a static universe of the type suggested by NLC what we're looking at is that the multi-dimensional informational framework that is static is in a singularity.  The algorithm that populates any one point or any group of points does so according to some pattern represented by the math and physics we observe, but there is still no true movement and this means there is a higher order that maintains the physics and this higher order is, most easily, a fixed system. But let's save that for later and instead look to the interesting features of a F-series defined universe.
The Anti-big bang: The "big bang" occurs at the far end of compression based on 55% of "space" converting the the far edge of the universe into photonic energy.  Note that the overall change between "each" stage of an F series is around 61.03% (the increase in the F-number) (another series solution, for those of you keeping track around 38.2% if you skip one) which is significant if you want to include the non-overlapping data section in the overall calculation.
Now those of you asking about the possibility of a "pre-space" universe are perfectly correct in assuming that a 171rst, or 1 billionth compression state is possible.  This means that there may be far more information (potentially an infinite amount) than what we have in our universe.  There is no reason why compression states have to end because an F-series doesn't have to end.  The "ending" that NLC envisions is where information as we understand it runs out.  If there is information in another sense, another "orbit" of information, these might well run out to infinity. Because of a limit in gravity (made up of quantum units of length) we experience, there appears to be a limit of the type of information which is significant to us and this limit can be calculated with great specificity based on (1) the total amount of gravity; (2) the conversion rate to linearity (length) and (3) the compression rate represented by the F-series (or other compression model).
Missing information-how much: How much information at once is capable but where is the missing information? The missing information, to the extent any is missing can come from many places or all of them.
There are parallel intersecting F-lines, there are perpendicular intersecting F-lines, these lines may overlap a primary line, there may be curves or apparent curves in the form of shorter F-lines within the orbits or areas defined by the primary F-lines, the dimensions past 3 (and we already have identified 5 or 6 different linear dimension (black holes and super-massive black holes being 5 and 6) almost assure that there is more going on than a simple change of orbit.
Selecting which or which combination has to wait for later, but for the moment let's look at one of the most simple models which is referenced in the data calculation given earlier.
First look at the flat two dimensional drawing which is provided for the F-series described previously. Now imagine a third dimension in which an identical looking line can run beside the F-series but not overlap it.   Then imagine a fourth dimension where a line can run equal distance from both of the parallel lines and beside both, then a fifth dimension forming a cube of such lines.  These, if we accept a single ct1 as the intersection of all other times could represent matter through black hole type compression.  Movement is possible between these which may be separated by no more than quantum spacing to allow fission and fusion.
Missing information and time:  There is a limited amount of time in the universe in NLT, it's a fixed amount of time.  The universe, however, is made up of quantum moments.  Imagine how much information is contained in even a short video compared to a still picture.  This is what allows our universe to be made of such a limited amount of information, it is the variation that matters to us, but there is very little information needed for that tiny fraction of a second identified as an instant earlier.
What about us creating a black hole of information?  What we call information is a different type of information than that taking up quantum instants.  We are only using that data to concentrate or alter the information in the universe.  The exchange (which is fixed) from one quantum moment to the next is nothing more than rearranging data of a fixed amount, even according to traditional physics.
  This doesn't mean that the price of wheat in England in 1800 isn't important; but under the conservation of mass theories as well as the NLC conservation of change concepts this increase in data, doesn't change the amount of information underlying these records.
What if there still isn't enough information?  Do we need to extend the F series out further than the 170 turns we discussed above?  Not necessarily.  There are many different options
Imagine a universe with sudden transitions where higher time states occur only after extremely long period (the areas where there is no overlap) next.  Alternatively, imagine that the periods of overlap are offset on each of the four defined F-series running parallel so that at any time at least one of them has overlap-note that this is unlikely given the overhangs, but for the moment we can ignore those issues.
Assume that curves connect the portions that have no overlap.  Imagine each fixed F-series surrounded by corresponding curves.
Shortly, I will provide the updated view of time orbits (the original, less specific version can be found in Non-linear time theory) based on a quantum, overlapping F-series algorithm, but we have to focus on this as an algorithm, quantum steps within the framework.  What the "picture" suggests is that there could be periods of compression followed by periods without compression, but this focuses on a very simple view and utilizes a single F-series algorithm for the entire universe.  The ideas set out above with multiple F series, the ideas of systems with an area defined by one or more F series all should play into this. It is also important to distinguish between the image of movement and an algorithm which does not rely on movement.
The idea behind this is that the intersecting F series defines one model for construction "time orbits" where there is a transition between one time state (e.g. ct2) and the next (ct3).  The exact structure of the model must be determined by what gives the best results, but there are many, many models to chose from and none of them need provide the basis for an algorithm (remembering that the actual movement does not exist, everything being fixed, everything happening at once, the algorithm merely defines the relationship in a way that allows us to perceive them.

nlc part undici-pi, phi and other series converging on information theory Part due

Sometimes, I feel so disoriented in the morning, it is like floating.
You see, because of you, I have to swim 3000 yards a day just to get to sleep.  Don't try to blame this on me.
You probably picture me in a room with strange drawings on the walls and a desk littered with papers, the top most being Fibonacci curves and the related math formulas and you are correct.  I live in a pretty strange place, the important things are ignored, I even have to remind myself to drink coffee.  The intellectual pursuits only weakly allow me to maintain my sanity, or perhaps it is something else I'm clinging to.
needless to say, other than the ravages of old age, I have not a scrap of fat on me.  That doesn't mean that I look good or feel particularly healthy.  I am more like a skeleton, essentially bald, with a thin layer of toughened skin stretched over it in no particular fashion.
Today, for example, i had to force one of my feet to the floor, as if gravity were uncertain of its hold on me or I on it and we had to work together lest my other foot leave the floor and I float off like a balloon.
The presence of Fibonacci curves is probably less significant than the quantum 3/5 straight lines turning 90 degrees (in the same direction) along with the F series (after 3, after 5, after 8, after 13, etc.  Since we are at the outermost point on the algorithm so expressed (if you get stuck on movement, you miss the elegance of the solution) the lines are so long that they appear as straight lines, even 5% of the way in from the far exterior.  In fact, using the "digital" format suggested by quantum theory, for extremely long F-series you are travelling, not essentially in a straight line, but in an actual straight line.  If the coordinates were represented by separate F-series curves, then at these extremely low compression states, they would be made of long, straight lines. changing relative to one another.  Since we are a ct4 state and, assuming ct1 is the outward moving spiral (quantum, non-curving spiral) then you have the three cadinal dimensions represented by lines, not curves.
The number of interactions can increase rapidly depending on the direction of the second spiral outward.  The 180 degree interaction is only a function of the two curves coming off at identical mirror image angles.  The others are worth exploring.  For the moment, however, we're only going to examine the 3/5 ratio grid lines (those moving according to F series in opposite directions from a common starting point.
These "right angle" lines (turning at each F series, still overlap at the 180 degree marks, but unlike the curves which overlap at a point, the grids overlap along alternating lines.  In this way you see overlap according to a formula where the overlap is the amount of overhang (on either side) added up plus the amount of overlap for each succeeding alternate F series.
Hence for the 1-2 series you have "zero" overlap, and one quantum unit extension on either side of the zero point so that for the 3-5 (skipping 2-3 because there's no overlap) the overlap is 2.  Given the length (The F number) you can get the overhang by subtracting the F number from the overlap previously calculated. Why do we care?
Maybe we shouldn't care, but a pattern forms based on succeeding layers.  The overlap can be seen as compression in this case and, because it is a F-series, it comes out as a percentage overlap vrs compression that approaches, but never reaches, a number along the lines of 55.2786405%. This suggests a level of compression  (doubling the number of coordinates changing or increasing exponentially) at each turn of 55%  The "cumulative effect" (starting not at the center but at an extreme) is that you have compression of a little more than half of the remaining matter at each stage until you get to the very beginning (non-linearity) when the final combination is of 40% which gives us insight (if we accept this model as having any value at all) that immediately before we go to non-linearity (everything happening at once) we have 5 states going down to two as a result of compression of two very very dense clock times (ctx-2; where x is the second to last compression state and is, according to this model the total amount of information in the universe/5 going to the total amount of information in the universe divided by two; then absolute linearity before going back outward again on the ct1 spiral.)
Just to give you an idea of what this says in terms of compression (keeping in mind that compression occurs at every other F-series number and if you are looking in the opposite direction, going out around 340 spirals (170 overlaps of around 55% each) you're at the state where the compressed vrs uncompressed matter is along the scale of 2.1x10^71 vs 1.2x10^71 which is a very small part of the total amount of quantum information in the universe.  Notwithstanding that, at 5% (where we're living) you have enormous amounts of uncompressed information.  Now I know what you're thinking. This would mean that at 5% we should have 5% energy/matter/black hole and beyond stuff and the rest would be dark matter and that this represents many more than the 4-6 (super massive black holes) than we experience, but let's look at this another way and let's pick, at random, the starting point of 340 which means to get to full compression there would be a total of 170 compression states, far more than the 5 or 6 we see.
For the sake of argument, let's say that we are, therefore according to a F series at 6 of 170 steps towards non-linearity.  This translates to 3.5% of the way there which is within the range we might consider (it's close enough to the observed 5% to be worth considering).  Now some of you are asking, how much information was there before and the total amount (going out an additional 6 steps is only 3.8654x10^72.  The difference, however, has to do with how much compression takes place at each step.  Even though the maximum 1 step of compression is 2.1x10^72, the total compression over these 6 steps is around 3.3x10^72 of a starting amount of information of 3.8x10^72 bytes of information and over time the total compression is in this same range since the beginning. Not much info you say?  But now remember that at each stage of compression you have an exponential 2^n amount of processing possible and you have 2^170 stages of compression.  This gets you (conceivably anyway), over 5x10^123 bits of information possible at any quantum moment in the universe although to be sure I need to check my math.

And if you want, you can get to this massive number (ct1) by looking at this single quantum needle (the line running up the top rectangle in the drawing below) going in one direction, meeting a dead end before going to the other  like a metronome thereby creating the first step in the quantum box then going in the opposite direction.  In this way the information is built out as an algorithm which forms all the data in the universe (going out, coming back in is the opposite process, what we're calling compression).
And, of course, you want some idea of what this looks like?  A little underwhelming.

nlc part dix-pi, phi and other series converging on information theory

Pi and Phi are to two common features of converging series within a logarithmic spiral according to the golden ration (3/5).
Pi converges utilizing a series of increasing numbers according to the formula 1, 3, 5, 7 utilizing the formula 4/1-4/3+4/5-4/7.
Phi converges utilizing division with F series of numbers (x,a,a+a,a+a+a,(a+a+a+a+a),(a+a+a+a+a+a+a+a),etc basically adding each of the two prior numbers to get to the next number: 0,1,1,2,3,5,8,etc  You'll note in the initial formulation zero is excluded in favor of x.
This can be revisited, but we're dealing with a quantum length and x represents g-space or a non-informational state in NLC.  the convergent series (phi-how clever, pi to phi=fi) in this case is one number divided by the prior number:
1/x, 1/1, 2/1,3/2,f/f-1 for the entire series.
In such a system, the "quantum" size is found at the initial point in the series (having a ratio of 1/2) with a radius of 1 (therefore a length of pi*1 where 1 is the quantum length.  This is a unique relationship since all other arcs are a function of r=fibrunicci(pi/2).
so  you initially have:
1,1,2,3,5,8,13 etc as the F series.  The first step in the series 1:1 is not seen any more than the first stop in determining pi (4/(-1)) for the simple reason that there is no length beyond 1, you cannot cut a quantum distance in half.  In terms of information theory, this is one bit.  Half a bit (yes/no) would be neither yes or no, instead it would be half yes and half no which I presume means it would be a "maybe".  For those of you looking for randomness in NLC theory, perhaps you've found it.
No perfect circle or perfect spiral can be drawn unless drawn to this minimum size because the two are represented by converging (but never arriving).
The quantum point in an F series converges with pi for several reasons.  At this minimum length the arc is a whole arc, as opposed to a half arc.  It is also half a sphere with radius 1.  The "area" of this arc/half circle is pi*r.
This unique relationship (a function of quantum math as much as anything) changes radically where the 3/5 ratio is established at the second step in the series from 1:2 to 2:3. which results from the shifting of the center of the arc which has a new center shifted 1 space, the next center being shifted...2 spaces, the next 3 and so on in a mirror of the series.  The difference being that in the unique 1:2 space the arc originates from the center and that never happens again.  Technically, this is because you have to start each line at a corner and the arc has to contact with the prior arc.  At least one of you is wondering about this initial arc, and you're well advised to do so.  The 1:1 and 1:2 arcs are two halves which are identical.  In the language above we are having information multiply.
At least one of you is asking about the 0-1 arc and if you want to see what it doesn't exist (in two dimensional space) try drawing it, it has nowhere to go.  In this case it is a quantum length so you can't divide it, so don't try.  You are thinking right now "but I can cut any space in half" but this is information and if you cut it in half you only have a maybe and we have to save maybe math for later.  If you are uncomfortable with this, you need to come up with your own theory of the universe, this is mine.  Anyway, for the 1:1 part of the series it is the only place where the two arcs have the same point of origin and hence the 1:1 and 1:2 can be drawn without "lifting" the central pivot of the arc.  The remaining arcs shift with the F series (if you don't believe me, try it).
 The relationship of the two infinite series and phi is shown at this point according to this equation:
The length of the arc is equal to quantum length at this point and the gold ratio at this point is one so at the quantum length (unlike everywhere else in the universe) the length is pi*r/2, r=1, and phi is one.  At this quantum length, then pi*r/2=pi*phi/2 and r=phi.  Phi alters past the quantum length and approaches  1.61803399 but never ends until the far end of the spectrum where pi is solved based on the number of places out that pi goes and phi is solved by going out as many places both being a function of the total amount of information in space.
The two are related outside of quantum space by the equations: 2cos(pi/5)=phi or 2sin(pi/5)=(3-phi)^1/2 which is the mathematical relationship between the arcs described above and the movement of the center point according to the fibrunicci equation (The "pointer" of  a compass starts in the center and moves one quantum space around boxes drawn according to the 3/5 (golden) ratio.  0 spaces, 1 space (from the zero space), 2 spaces (from the prior center point of one space movement), 3 spaces from the second starting point, etc so that you can draw a F "expanding quantum line, taking a 90 degree turn after each F quantum points which encompasses the curve of the spiral which are sequentially defined by r=next number in the F series and a starting point at the end of the prior corresponding F series along the quantum line.
If you draw out this first quantum 1:1 and 1:2 location you are struck with the only curve within the pantheon of curves of the gold triangle that seems to vibrate from the common starting point, as if uncertain in which direction to travel.  It is almost like a fickle lover, in love one day, the next callous and cold, one day ready to love forever, the next full of scorn and disdain.
One can see at this unique point in a sprial universe, that it is the only place where curves traveling in both directions could originate and one can well imagine before the unwinding of time within this 180 degree curve, all of the event of time, all of the information moving back and forth like a metronome as linearity begins it crucial first steps as a vibrating needle with its apex at the center of the two 1x1 squares, all the yeses and nos of the fickle lover balanced in the algorithm.  Yes and no, and in between maybe.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Vajq-UK2aE