nlc NLC-time orbits after the application of Fibonacci F-series part 4 Inward moving spirals in an expanding universe

I am a horrible person, really.  I did play a big role in building my own private hell, and for that I have what I deserve, but a better person would not have so many other souls suffering as a result, nor would the result have so little logic.  I am a little, bitter man, but of course I know more about black holes than anyone at nasa, so there's that.  Or maybe I don't.  For the last couple of weeks I have spent much of my time dealing with issues that are quite far removed.  They were forced on me to try to get my theory to fit into observations.  The damned black holes not fading to the same place.  That would be more easily addressed by saying it is merely perspective, perhaps blaming it on some cosmological constant like einstein and his steady state universe.  But that would be a sissy's way out; perhaps it would be right for me.  I shocked my pool and was too impatient to wait for the chlorine level to go down, so I will likely dissolve tonight and you'll have to find some other blog to follow.  The universe will again become murky, there is that.  Come hell, come for me.

I'm sure after reading the last post, some of you are questioning my fidelity.  This is unfair.  If anyone's fidelity should be in question it is yours.  There are many excuses that can be made, but excuses are like octopus arms, although I'm not sure why.
You're thinking that I cannot easily estimate the amount of force generated by the last intersection and where that leaves  us in terms of what place in a current cycle.  It's actually pretty easy to at least come up with a rough idea of how it would be interpreted in terms of current mass and the relationship to black hole or post black hole ct6 states is not particularly relevant.

It is really nothing more than determining the mass of matter that is observed in the universe which is 10% of that required for a secondary (in this case a quartenary or sequential otherwise collaspse) and we can assume that 90% of the matter therefore exists in the form of ct6 and higher.  NLC, unfortunately, assumes that space, being spread out (and possibly moving in the wrong direction in the spiral) hides much of the space.  But these are merely variables in the equation.
What we do have is a series of equations that convert specific amounts of whatever came before and we know those from the exponential compression formula.  To be specific we have to estimate how much time is moving in each of the two intersecting spirals, but what we do know is that over 55% of the intersection (in spiral theory which we're accepting for the sake of argument and not because its the solution to the algorithm driving the display of the singularity where everything happens at once) that compression of the next stage happens.  We also know the first time, that only a single strand of time is reversed and carried forward to the next intersection and that this increases by a factor of two based on the new number of dimensions carried forward on the spiral that we consider to be our time, even though it is only a distance.
Assuming that at each state there is an exponential change, we can take this mater and apply the energy equations for fusion reactions to determine a very rough approximation of how much of an explosion in terms of ct4-ct3 would result from the fusion/compression reaction for each of the states of matter and then try to match that particular explosion with what we observe.  This allows us to understand the force that led to the latest expansion of the universe.
We now have to look at our universe again.  The universe should be a spiral at the point where gravity takes over and reverses the direction.  This indicates we are still in the post explosion state which makes perfect sense as we observe the universe continuing to expand.  If you drain water through a hole, you get the same spiral you get from matter falling into a black hole, but if you set off an explosion at the hole the spiral will be disrupted.  This same process on a large scale occurs with matter falling into black holes and, presumably, with sequential big bangs.  Hence by examining the state of our universe compared to what inward moving spirals would look like we should be able to estimate where we are in the cycle of the explosion and therefore along the spiral.
Estimates say there are at least 100,000 million galaxies with an average of 100 million stars with each galaxy rotating each 1000 million years with 10,000 million years of expansion so far; but in NLC these are stagnant figures and the original rotation continues to exist in theory, the time frame that matters is the single quantum instant referred to previously.  We need to discuss the missing matter next, but for now it's important to note only that space doesn't look like it has gravity because it is spread out over not just the current big bang, but the others too.  There's just so much of it that we think it goes further than it does, but the universe has an outer limit even according to non-expanding universe theories outside of NLC and NLC must, of course, match with the accurate part of those.
"Black holes" are not that difficult to see, but they don't look like other matter so ct6 and higher states can be considered even harder to observe.
I am going to address the issues set out in the prior blog, but some things have to wait because of the problems that I face and you may or may not get more,  Tonight, instead of finishing, I'm striving not to loose my mind and I'm waiting to see if I dissolve or not.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1gLGjPFkRA

And don't we all,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGzgoSg5OZg