One of the curious features of NLC in an intersecting F-series line/spiral is that the big bang now comes at the "end" of the universe instead of the "beginning."
Just like with us, there is no true beginning or end, just a series of highs and lows reflecting the amount of intellect I do or don't bring to things, you being the more constant, no, I'm just kidding, I'm more consistent. That being said, we can ignore any part of this, the past, you can ignore the future, I can't; but there is an underlying truth and whatever that is, that is perhaps what I need to look for, more than the past, more than the present, for that will define the future.
Before I get too far into this, the F-series model leaves the possibility of "missing information." In this view of the universe, even with 170 stages of compression (remember that puts us around 3.5% where we are today), the amount of information forming the universe is even more finite (at any quantum moment) than we'd be comfortable in a very, very big universe. The algorithm is working with a finite amount of information which includes all times, past, present and future, but at any one point, only a certain amount of this information is selected by the algorithm and this amount remains constant.
There isn't one answer to this issue, but there are a number of possible answers. The key to the analysis is that we are talking about a "background" algorithm for "populating" a "static" universe. Later, not now, we will deal with each of these issues together; but essentially in a static universe of the type suggested by NLC what we're looking at is that the multi-dimensional informational framework that is static is in a singularity. The algorithm that populates any one point or any group of points does so according to some pattern represented by the math and physics we observe, but there is still no true movement and this means there is a higher order that maintains the physics and this higher order is, most easily, a fixed system. But let's save that for later and instead look to the interesting features of a F-series defined universe.
The Anti-big bang: The "big bang" occurs at the far end of compression based on 55% of "space" converting the the far edge of the universe into photonic energy. Note that the overall change between "each" stage of an F series is around 61.03% (the increase in the F-number) (another series solution, for those of you keeping track around 38.2% if you skip one) which is significant if you want to include the non-overlapping data section in the overall calculation.
Now those of you asking about the possibility of a "pre-space" universe are perfectly correct in assuming that a 171rst, or 1 billionth compression state is possible. This means that there may be far more information (potentially an infinite amount) than what we have in our universe. There is no reason why compression states have to end because an F-series doesn't have to end. The "ending" that NLC envisions is where information as we understand it runs out. If there is information in another sense, another "orbit" of information, these might well run out to infinity. Because of a limit in gravity (made up of quantum units of length) we experience, there appears to be a limit of the type of information which is significant to us and this limit can be calculated with great specificity based on (1) the total amount of gravity; (2) the conversion rate to linearity (length) and (3) the compression rate represented by the F-series (or other compression model).
Missing information-how much: How much information at once is capable but where is the missing information? The missing information, to the extent any is missing can come from many places or all of them.
There are parallel intersecting F-lines, there are perpendicular intersecting F-lines, these lines may overlap a primary line, there may be curves or apparent curves in the form of shorter F-lines within the orbits or areas defined by the primary F-lines, the dimensions past 3 (and we already have identified 5 or 6 different linear dimension (black holes and super-massive black holes being 5 and 6) almost assure that there is more going on than a simple change of orbit.
Selecting which or which combination has to wait for later, but for the moment let's look at one of the most simple models which is referenced in the data calculation given earlier.
First look at the flat two dimensional drawing which is provided for the F-series described previously. Now imagine a third dimension in which an identical looking line can run beside the F-series but not overlap it. Then imagine a fourth dimension where a line can run equal distance from both of the parallel lines and beside both, then a fifth dimension forming a cube of such lines. These, if we accept a single ct1 as the intersection of all other times could represent matter through black hole type compression. Movement is possible between these which may be separated by no more than quantum spacing to allow fission and fusion.
Missing information and time: There is a limited amount of time in the universe in NLT, it's a fixed amount of time. The universe, however, is made up of quantum moments. Imagine how much information is contained in even a short video compared to a still picture. This is what allows our universe to be made of such a limited amount of information, it is the variation that matters to us, but there is very little information needed for that tiny fraction of a second identified as an instant earlier.
What about us creating a black hole of information? What we call information is a different type of information than that taking up quantum instants. We are only using that data to concentrate or alter the information in the universe. The exchange (which is fixed) from one quantum moment to the next is nothing more than rearranging data of a fixed amount, even according to traditional physics.
This doesn't mean that the price of wheat in England in 1800 isn't important; but under the conservation of mass theories as well as the NLC conservation of change concepts this increase in data, doesn't change the amount of information underlying these records.
What if there still isn't enough information? Do we need to extend the F series out further than the 170 turns we discussed above? Not necessarily. There are many different options
Imagine a universe with sudden transitions where higher time states occur only after extremely long period (the areas where there is no overlap) next. Alternatively, imagine that the periods of overlap are offset on each of the four defined F-series running parallel so that at any time at least one of them has overlap-note that this is unlikely given the overhangs, but for the moment we can ignore those issues.
Assume that curves connect the portions that have no overlap. Imagine each fixed F-series surrounded by corresponding curves.
Shortly, I will provide the updated view of time orbits (the original, less specific version can be found in Non-linear time theory) based on a quantum, overlapping F-series algorithm, but we have to focus on this as an algorithm, quantum steps within the framework. What the "picture" suggests is that there could be periods of compression followed by periods without compression, but this focuses on a very simple view and utilizes a single F-series algorithm for the entire universe. The ideas set out above with multiple F series, the ideas of systems with an area defined by one or more F series all should play into this. It is also important to distinguish between the image of movement and an algorithm which does not rely on movement.
The idea behind this is that the intersecting F series defines one model for construction "time orbits" where there is a transition between one time state (e.g. ct2) and the next (ct3). The exact structure of the model must be determined by what gives the best results, but there are many, many models to chose from and none of them need provide the basis for an algorithm (remembering that the actual movement does not exist, everything being fixed, everything happening at once, the algorithm merely defines the relationship in a way that allows us to perceive them.
No comments:
Post a Comment