As we move forward to discuss the expansion of space, many of the scoffers are hacking (scoffing?) their hearts out, but they are providing little in the way of alternatives. Also, while I was not aware that Zeno had plowed this field (without the benefit of relativity) long before String theory started dreaming up holograms, I'd point out that it's really a continuation of the Greek mistakes, rather than mine (Ha! bet you didn't see that coming).
Anyway, today we'll talk more about expansion and why it appears to occur outside of gravity wells when you would expect just the opposite (from the big bang). This "suggests" that spatial expansion at the time of the big bang must have been something very special. It further suggests that some "rate" must have been present in high concentrations of space that is not present today where there are high concentrations of space that have accumulated into matter (where c1 has gone from zero to positive number). This suggests that energy can exist within rate change (where c1 is zero) but matter cannot. Or it suggests the opposite, space can be created in the presence of energy (which it surely is given the fact that energy travels through space being created) but space is not created in the presence of linear clock time!
Those of you who actually follow this (probably no one) have just fallen out of your chairs. Everyone else is probably scoffing up your lunch.
First, under NLT theory, there is no space and hence the expansion of the universe into something that makes no sense (some other dimension, some unspace like material, etc) is irrelevant, wrong and in the words of Zeno, an illusion. Likewise, the so-called acceleration of the universe is merely dimensions coordinates changing in favor (or over) conserved clock time. However the increased amount of space (which is linear time) must either be an expansion of space or the creation of additional quantum space and if there is conservation, then some other quantum elements must be exchanged. Of course, this makes traditional questions of dark energy irrelevant and dank matter can be reflected as nothing more than space itself which in this theory is a diluted (by c^2) form of energy and has mass related to its tendency to return to non-linear forms.
As the volume of the universe changes, the amount of change of the space coordinates and the rate of creation of quantum space (if such in fact occurs) can be calculated with a surprising amount of accuracy for an estimation.
The exact change rate, is much more complicated because every point on earth is changing relative to the spin of the earth, the spin of the solar system, the spin of the galaxy and the spin of the universe itself so it is not a clear or linear expansion matrix. Also the speed with which something spins would affect the overall rate of change. However, with conservation issues, these rates are not changing, the only metric of the matrix which is changing on a gross scale is volume, the other coordinate changes being more or less constant. Hence we can "measure" the change of volume and we should find this to reflect the other constants, but we're not giving anything away.
If you look at the universe as an "expanding" universe, what all the other methodologies require, light doesn't get to travel straight because it is also affected by this expansion. But if the universe is based on changing coordinates, and the creation of additional space with new coordinates, it is more like filling a container. And movement of everything, even light, is a function of changing coordinates as opposed o expanding space. This means the movement of light in an expanding universe would be similar but act very differently than in existing models. But in truth, if there is no distance, then the type of expansion we are discussing is only a change in coordinates.
Objects "drop out" of expansion when the coalesce, that is, there is enough gravity to prevent time from expanding linearly at the same rate. This gradually increases with the concentration of gravity until it stops being linear at all and the coordinates cease to change. Yet time coordinates change for black holes until they leave the universe. The theory, in NLT today, is that the observed portion of the black hole is the information before it has actually dropped out of the universe which is part of the equation 1/(1-x) as x approaches 1 which happens not at all in our time frame, but is a function of quantum gravity.
The increase of expansion which gives so much strangeness (relativity) is not as critical as if expansion is only an illusion (which doesn't make it any less important) since the speed of light controls rate change and relative coordinate change can happen without reference to distance (see the discussion as to "where" black holes go earlier in NLT theory). 7x10^-7m/s^2 is hubble acceleration which is observed.
constant
http://essayweb.net/astronomy/sizeofuniverse.shtml defines the dimension
The universe doubles in size of universe in 11.4 billion years at an accelerating rate and these entries, including the next one, will explain several methodologies which not only allow for this but provide post linearity explanations for this which are absent from physics which does not provide for Einsteinian pre-universe/pre-time physics..
No comments:
Post a Comment