The problem with physics up till quantum time was the question of space-time.
Non-linear time theory defines quantum time and the resulting quantum gravity which allows space to appear.
Up till now, physics was trapped trying to find "Matrix Theory"; some way of defining how space exists without "real instances" when in fact, those are all that exist. The problem with the prior theory was a search for a quantum state representing space time at this non-existent "instant". Under Non-Linear Time theory, the problems with Matrix theory are eliminated in favor of the problems of non-linear time; but at least they are eliminated.
Quantum time solves this problem by creating quantum instances yielding both gravity and dimensions following a model reflected in conversion of matter to energy (e=mc^2). The "matrix" is created at the same time that linear time is created at the planck length level.
In effect you can say that e=sc'^2 where energy derives from space times a squared unit (c') which could be the speed of light but is more likely derived from planck length dimensions. Similarly s=tc''^2 which allows space to be similarly defined by quantum time times a squared unit (c''); similarly derived (for an idea of where this leads backwards, see the earlier discussion of planck length dimensions and the origin of space in the universe.
Note that the extremely small size suggested for time (a single unit of space requires tc''^2 under this analysis of time) and the consequent small size of gravity (gravity being the unit given to the force required for time to go from being linear to non-linear) if we can assume that the mass to energy conversion carries backwards (is a reflection of the universal origins) can explain why quantum time is so difficult to observe. It's very small.
Measurements of gravity give some insight into this force of time.
(m1xm2)/r^2 is the gravitational relationship.
The "Force" for gravity is (G*m1*m2)/r^2 where the Force is defined by the gravitational constant of 6.673x10^-11Nm^2kg^-2. To put these numbers in perspective, you need to solve them for time; but to simplify this, we can compare this to electromagnetic forces (energy generates electro-magnetic forces so it's a good measure) and the relative strength is on the magnitude of 10^-36 for gravity. That is, if you were to buy into the idea of a graviton (Non-linear time replaces gravitons with single times going non-linear) you would need 1*10^36 gravitons to equal the minimal measure of electromagnetic force. This factor is important for purposes of this discussion.
Since we are dealing in meters/second with gravity, we'll look at the speed of light in terms of meters/second which is 300,000,000 meters in one second or 3*10^8 meters per second (approximately). The speed of light squared is roughly 9*10^16. This is the c(squared) you see in the energy to mass equation.
Squaring this again you get a factor of 81*10^32 or 8.1^10^33. This is surprisingly "close" to the order of magnitude (10^-36) you see for the relative force of electromagnetic force to gravity which is what you would expect to find for the equation e=sc''^2 if c''=speed of light.
Note that we have not yet gone to the orders of magnitude "if" you were to have to create space from time (10^64); but we are still looking at a measure that could reflect either gravity coming from the creation of linearity because if gravity is the tendency of time to become non-linear, it is easy to imagine that this would be a simultaneous (from an energy standpoint) from the creation of energy from space since the measure to create space itself from time could be either (1) inherent in the creation of energy from space or (2) due to forces which are outside of the so called "matrix" of "Matrix theory"; which means forces that are not forces as we understand them at all.
Also note that 10^3 (the rough difference in orders of magnitude) is only along the magnitude of 1000 times). We'll solve this with the creation of 3 dimensions of space, by the way, but before we do that, let's talk about why we can expect the ratio to be based on light squared (intuitively) as opposed to light cubed. You might think that we need to look at three dimensions of space but the truth is very different in a quantum time universe. The reason is that dimension is only defined in terms of two dimensions at a time because clock time can only move in a linear fashion between two points.
Going back to our concept of the creation of the universe we have no space and non-linear time. Then time achieves non-linearity and we have a planck length line containing everything. This super concentrated line (the entire universe in a planck length line) only achieves the third dimension (the planck diameter sphere) through the action of time along lengths at planck length; a measurement that prior to time going linear had no meaning. Planck length is, as a result of a very similar derivation, equal to 1.6x10^-35 meters which (by virtue of similar derivation as much as "coincidence") is the same order of magnitude as we decided by virtue of the other derivation; i.e. that quantum time becomes linear yielding a plank length minimal building block (string in string theory).
More on this later.
Now, I mentioned that this should be getting finished more quickly; and there are several reasons this isn't happening. I'm only going to mention one. There is someone who is intentionally slowing down the process by misinterpreting everything I do; well not everything, but enough to slow this process down. It doesn't help that CERN and Stanford aren't working on it. After the rose bowl, maybe I should go to Michigan; but that doesn't solve the bigger problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment