--2/33 and 9 Black Holes and space and time as we now know them: A review of non-linear time with some extra stuff-part 9

Slept better than I should with megadroughts, wildfires, volcanos, hurricanes, pandemics and whatever other clear indications we're in the middle of the apocalypse happen to be out there.

I'm too busy for this.

Monday is the day for me to follow up on my calendar, but then it will be a -5, it is a busy day already.  What is there and what isn't?  The silence is deafening.

My "budget" remains in flux for this.  There's a lot to deal with in the next 33 days, more than can be done in 40 days.  It would be nice to get some cushion for what is, after all, a fairly short period of time in the grand scheme of things.

Is it time to explore higher (sea level) places to live?  

Apparently so according to Jesse Kennan (Tulane): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GE3N1f2XgGQ

And is there some place where can find a cheap lunch on the way?  I don't know and it depends on where you're going, but there are indications...

https://www.layerculture.com/blog/is-juarez-safe/

https://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurants-g150780-Ciudad_Juarez_Northern_Mexico.html

Makes the alternative of not doing it seem illogical?

On the science front, the paperback version of the NPTE is finally ready, cover issues which were pretty easy to deal with but took 7 or 8 days because of poor approaches and waiting for feedback.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09BYDH2BP

Looks like the cover ended up PG, but I think the paperback is different after all of whatever happened.  I don't like it as much, but I can change the cover in the next edition now that I understand the process problems and options and that will make the second edition rare like the first.

Sometimes there is nothing on this feed, sometimes it makes iceland, well iceland.

volcano feed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd05OQxG3gA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1I-0PUhFmU

So what was going on 2/13/14?  It's early in the conceptualization of time, most of this is nonsense today; but it does show some evolution, the first use of "ct" in this series of posts that I can recall; even though it isn't being used the right way.  Very interesting.

2/13/14

From USA TODAY Why can't we move faster than the speed of light? Why can't we move faster than the speed of light? Well, the reader's question was a tad more complicated than this, but it all boils down to the same thing. He wanted to know what would happen to someone if they were on a train that was already moving at the speed of light. If that person walked down the aisle, would they be moving faster than the speed of light? The short answer is, no. But it turns out, the real answer is more complicated than that. Physicists tell us that it's impossible to move at the speed of light, let alone faster than the speed of light. That's because, in part, mass and energy are really the same thing (even though we don't perceive them that way). And, as objects get closer and closer to the speed of light, odd things start to happen. What are those odd things? Watch this video of science reporter Elizabeth Weise's answer to this reader question. http://usat.ly/1kWbjTr Get USA TODAY on your mobile device: http://www.usatoday.com/mobile-apps

Let's talk about what is right and what is wrong about this from a NLT theory.
One thing that NLT tells us, based on a conservation of coordinate change, is that clock time 1 ceases as you approach the speed of light.  Since you would need clock time 1 in order to step forward on the train, it just makes sense that you would not be able to move from the speed of light (which is really only coordinates changing at a set speed) because there would be no clock time to use up to make the move.
Going back to the data-base model of our universe, we operate with a given set of hertz and cannot depart from it.