NLT the next step Part 23-Time Orbits

I won't talk of love
but that doesn't mean
that it doesn't exist
I'll not talk of the future
but we all have one
Now we'll talk of orbits
Should I hope or dispair
that ours come together
or has your left already

It's only natural that someone who invents time states with a chemistry degree would find orbits as a conceptual resting place.  Orbits speak to dimension and we need to avoid that, but for now lets allow that coordinate changes can move to different states of time.

TIME AS ORBITS: The question has to be answered as to how time Points combine in higher states. One seductive dimensional model would be the atomic and molecular model. A single full one (gravity) followed by a single time orbit but with a series of excited states, or perhaps increasingly unexcited states.

The problem with the model is that it requires dimensional characteristics, but the value of the model is too strong to ignore. Let us discuss this.

First lets ignore the dimensional problems and look at how the model could work. There may be seen as two separate “orbits”. The first is the CT0 to CT1 orbit. This one is vastly different from the following three orbits. This is similar to the circular orbit reflected in atoms. It would be the “gravity” orbit and would have a single state. Each orbit allows for existence of all coordinate changes within the orbit.

The second orbit is this first rendition of the model would be the next higher orbit, one that allows nearby Point times to combine in a cloud. This would cover CT1 to CT2 and would have an excited state which allowed CT2 to CT3 changes.

The connection between points in these time states is not close and allows division of points easily.

Ignoring the potential for intervening “time states in the second orbit”, the next time state would be for CT3 to CT4, the state allowing for matter and standard clock time. This orbit would be different, more dispersed to allow for a stronger “sharing” of the coordinate changes between points.

It is possible that one “orbit” might have to be filled in some way before the second one could be reached, but this seems inconsistent with conservation of time arguments. Also, there is the question of “what” would “fill” an orbit.

The differences between the strength of different orbits or form of orbits would account for the vast differences between gravity and energy and perhaps the differences between energy and matter.

An examination of what allows orbits without dimension is the examination of nothing more complex than different states of Time and how time may share coordinate change.