I'm very happy with where we are right now in Non-linear time theory. I'm not very happy with my personal life which is in shambles, dare I say as usual? Perhaps it is the company I keep or don't keep, but that is a topic I've agreed to avoid.
The question of whether I had given away the farm already in NLT was asked, but I can assure you the best is yet to come. It needs more ground work, but we'll be getting back the CT5, evolution, predestination and we'll even get a little farther into the layers of the onion which traditional science says is unreachable. So those of you who wonder whether there is any place yet to go with NLT, all I can say is buckle your seatbelts.
But first, lets go away from what I want to talk about, which has nothing to do with time, and lay some additional groundwork.
I guess we should all lighten up a little, the universe is not as dense as it appears, in fact it isn't dense at all, it's just a matter of change.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0LAs7X5ybE
RATE OF CHANGE: There is a great deal of separation possible, infinite length in two dimensions. These would be limited if the universe does not have a width corresponding to this arrangement. You have P(CT1, CT2) at this time with the “rate of change” of coordinates being conserved. That is, the rate of change of coordinates is no greater than the changes seen for CT1 alone. These two dimensional features change the Force. It is F1(x,y,z)dx gravity force to F2(x,y,z)dxdy photon force (theorized). What can be seen is that as multiple Force dimensional features change, so do the force features. This process continues for all dimensional qualities and force qualities.
The question of whether I had given away the farm already in NLT was asked, but I can assure you the best is yet to come. It needs more ground work, but we'll be getting back the CT5, evolution, predestination and we'll even get a little farther into the layers of the onion which traditional science says is unreachable. So those of you who wonder whether there is any place yet to go with NLT, all I can say is buckle your seatbelts.
But first, lets go away from what I want to talk about, which has nothing to do with time, and lay some additional groundwork.
I guess we should all lighten up a little, the universe is not as dense as it appears, in fact it isn't dense at all, it's just a matter of change.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0LAs7X5ybE
RATE OF CHANGE: There is a great deal of separation possible, infinite length in two dimensions. These would be limited if the universe does not have a width corresponding to this arrangement. You have P(CT1, CT2) at this time with the “rate of change” of coordinates being conserved. That is, the rate of change of coordinates is no greater than the changes seen for CT1 alone. These two dimensional features change the Force. It is F1(x,y,z)dx gravity force to F2(x,y,z)dxdy photon force (theorized). What can be seen is that as multiple Force dimensional features change, so do the force features. This process continues for all dimensional qualities and force qualities.
This envisions CT1-CT4, only one force
is created by a single change in coordinate sets. This is not necessarily the case. The idea
that interim coordinate changes are possible remains. What makes this work, is that NLT is not
restricted to changes in dimension that we envision as matter beings. Changes that are force related, those that
occur simultaneously with dimensional changes, something so foreign to us it is
a different at energy is to matter. What
we blindly accept as “force” characteristics are so vastly different from dimensional
characteristics that to accept them, but what they really represent are
features of Clock Time changes that are as different as gravity is from light,
light from electromagnetic energy, those from nuclear forces, nuclear forces
from matter, CT1 from Standard Clock time.
They exist sequentially and together.
Unlike the predecessor theory based more closely on Einstein, under NLT
time always exists, just the coordinates do not change in some states, in those
states or in those coordinate sets time is non-linear.
No comments:
Post a Comment