This is a complicated section that requires a great deal of groundwork just to understand the transition point even if every conceivable shortcut is used.
This piece is so complicated, bringing many pieces together. Therefore, I'll take this post as an opportunity to lay some foundation for the foundation. As written it takes "theories" or models of NLT and just accepts them. Selection one or another and discarding the rest to make the points related to the transition even though some other model for some part of the equation may work better. An example are the multiple ways that a black hole can be treated which I "repeat" below in conjunction with an article that shows how NLT is the proper theory even though it is a prediction based on quantum loop gravity theory.
Assumptions are assumed, and changes accepted without regard to even whether they are the best suppported. Even so, the answers are riddles that need to be solved to have this. And if we succeed in understanding that we are trapped in Non-linear time, free to do what we have always done and always will do, then what? Is it madness? Do we assume we can break the code, reprogram the universe to our liking and if we can does that mean that we've always done it. Is that what happens when we reach CT5 or CT6 of CTinfinity? Doe we get to the point where we can change the script, where everything does not happen at once? Do we find a place where non-linearity of time is linear after all? And can we reach that point without changing fundamentally what we are, either something less than photons or more than black holes. Something that changes so fast it doesn't change at all, it happens all at once, or something that changes so slowly that it can manipulate the fabric of non-linearity itself.
http://huff.to/1yBePcO One of the items that lends credence to NLT is reconciling of other theories and articles like this one that predict, using loop quantum gravity in this case, the same result that is predicted in NLT. If you read earlier posts you'll see several versions of this predicted depending on whether there is expansion of space (the expansion of the matrix through quantum time coordinates being added) outside of gravity wells through the conversion of matter to energy to space in black holes or whether there is not (Gavin Wince and his predecessors predicting a steady state universe) in which case the transition is to a near non-linear status (even the relative incompleteness is predicted by NLT due to the equation 1/t-x as x approaches t being a part of the black hole experience just as its part of the energy to matter observed experience or a second alternative being the black holes represent a different time state entirely, namely CT5 which is discussed later but which has been discussed briefly in prior posts.
The point is that these other methodologies are little more than moving towards NLT from space time and NLT is movement from a place where everything happens at once towards the appearance of space time which, of course, doesn't really exist as rationalized by Parminedes 2500 years ago, to whom Einstein was appropriately compared to even though Einstein didn't have the tools to take his solution to Parminedes and turn it into the theory of NLT.
No comments:
Post a Comment