Aut-BAA-1; the absence of symmetry-New Drawings

Welcome to Sunday in the Eastern Hemisphere.  As usual, something special is being provided for your entertainment.  Soon we will discuss these drawings, but first we have to cover some other material.  These drawings will be used to show the development of relative time.  The first in the next long series begins below these drawings.  We will discuss time, discuss how there is another offset of time that provides for separation in addition to the offset of layers.

The figures below show the origin of this offset, but the explanation goes beyond these drawings and the ones that follow.

Perhaps the most important remaining issue is about to be addressed; the discussion of a mechanism for generating compression at higher ct states, the missing link in AuT!  While the math has not been worked out completely for this compression mechanism; it provides a mechanism for creating higher ct states separated dimensionally from the enormous amounts of raw data generated by staked universe.  It is another one of those classic moments when this disclosure blows away all physics that came before it and you are about to read it for the first time anywhere.  Woohoo.

AuT-Building an algorithm 1 absence of symmetry and the big bang

The idea of a "true" big bang from a singularity is a pretty unlikely idea.  The "big bounce" concept is close, but flawed.

What is "proved," really proved mathematically, by AuT is that the universe only partially compresses.  This is because the compression process is necessarily like the converging pi series and hence it only goes partially compressed and then partially expanded between inflection points.  This suggests that even though the amount of information increases, the maximum size of the universe tends towards a higher compression but the amount of information increases.

The K-P ignorance can only partially explain this.  Increasing compression in AuT allows for infinite increase in information while decreasing towards but never reaching zero space, i.e. two fully compressed states but each with increasing amounts of information.

Another alternative is that inflection points are inflection points for higher states of information (higher ct states) but that ct1 doesn't have inflection points but continually gets larger.

The math for this model is more complex, but as shown below, while the basic model is fairly easy to define; the asymmetric model of AuT gets complicated fairly quickly.

Unlike K-P, there is predictability and symmetry at quantum points, but no overall symmetry by definition in AuT since it is based on converging series.

Each universe changes based on the two before which changes the overall symmetry.

It is also positive that what converging symmetry exists in AuT uses "both" positive and negative spirals at each convergence.

Perhaps the most likely method of an ever increasing size and convergence is that the % of space (to higher ct states?) steadily decreases at maximum compression even while the total amount increases for ever.  The same may be true of divergence. The universe as a % grows less while the total growth increases.  This latter satisfies the increase in heavier (higher ct state) manifestations of information while the overall growth as a percentage (of space?) decreases.  This also maintains the relativity of the space time universe to ct1.

The degree of convergence is also capable of multiple renditions.

Let's look at just the first three convergence models using both positive and negative spirals about a single point of origin without "aging" any of the involved spirals.

This shows f-series addition of dual (positive and 

negative) spirals with opposite converging series.  Even at 3 it is vastly more complex

and continues to get exponentially more complicated.

                

Perhaps one of the most significant features of this stacked universe is that when the relative change occurs, no two F-series carriers will be exactly the same length, no relative change will be the same and no SCT will be exactly the same as another.  This occurs via a complicated process, potentially involving like sized spirals that are generated at times to create the stacking mechanism which is so illusive.  While this is discussed in detail later, it is so important it will be touched on here.
The spirals are generated as set forth herein, then the results are stacked in order to generate carrier spirals.  This process continues on so many different levels that it is possible that the compression states are generated when 256 ct1 spirals align at the same time to generate a single photon and the same process occurs at the enormous values of x required to get similar concentrations of ct2 to get to ct3 and so on as x increases towards infinity.

These models work for both fundamental algorithms and the so called “carrier algorithms” formed by stacking prior states in order to form subsequent universes.  If you add the aging of the spirals (moving a spiral along its length) about the simple model, it quickly gets complicated enough to explain the diverse universe and the illusion of randomness that we experience.  A study of the model shows that entropy is balanced by anti-entropy (or slightly overcome by anti-entropy before the A-E is overcome by entropy again) so that the universe functions like a converging series as reflected by pi which eliminates randomness and at the true quantum level.