Pages

Saturday, December 10, 2016

AuT Lumpy Time 7-Two pis for the price of one

I'm looking out of a cabin window looking at a remote lake.  Some military people doing communications are here with me, no one else.  There is no internet connection, but I've made a mobile hotspot with a mobile device so I can share this post this morning.  I have been up since 4:00am and even now the sun has just risen.
I'm dealing with some complicated issues this morning drinking the very bad coffee that these military people are listening too.  It sounds a little like a airport terminal here so I'm distracted by the static. it's a very quiet and lonely place to work, but there are no distractions and it is good for what I am doing.  Later,perhaps, I will walk the trail that is supposed to go around the lake.  It is very cold.

AuT Lumpy Time 7-Two pis for one


Since space exists independent of mass, energy independent of black holes and the like without dimension this suggests that pi is also a function of the relative change of ct(high state) to ct1.  What this suggests is that pi does not fit into the ct0-ct1 equation but only arises at the ct1-ct2 interface.  While not convincing alone, there is little reason for pi in a non-dimensional, non-space time environment.
You may, however, still require pi in order to go from ct1 to ct2.   This is not the approximately 22/7 pi, of course, because numbers are dimensional constructs.  Instead it is the pi that is derived from offsetting 1,1,1 space to get 11,11,11 photonic information states.
The next offset goes from 11,11,11 to 111,111,111 in conjunction with the F-series growth of information states which also leads to an information theory based outcome as discussed herein or perhaps the information based outcome results in the F-series. It is not a purely theoretical distinction.
There is little curvature of space because of the rate of separation between photons and because photons do not cling together.  These two feature are identical since the rate of substitution of ct1 for ct2 means that no further substitution can occur lest the ct2 “break down” to ct1 because of the relationship of the F-series to information theory and the resulting observed stability of the photon state to space.  This does not mean that the speed of light has a maximum speed, it merely means that photons break down into space when they are accelerated past 1:256 substitution rates.
Higher states, beginning with wave energy do cling together.  Waves cling together weakly.  This suggests something unusual.  The curvature of light, the wave form of energy, should be greater than the curvature of photonic energy and the change in curvature should be observable at the levels that we measure things.  The bending of light does vary by wave-length, but this “K-physics” observation is a reflection of something within an algorithm.
The value of pi seems to be the feature of the algorithm which allows for what we observe as localized curvature changes based on the solution of pi in a localized environment which in turn is based on stacking features of information other than “orbital jumps”.  I use “orbital jumps” in place of “quantum jumps” which distinguishes different informational state changes to give some clarity and not because one is quantum and the other is not since all change in quantum change in a single variable universe.
This gradual orbital change in pi is, of course, observed in the curvature of space-time in proximity to larger masses.
The change in curvature of space may change without pi changing, however.  The reason is that curvature is a relativistic feature and therefore is based on the relationship of ct(higher) to ct1.
To understand how a change in mass can reflect increased curvature in space in the absence of a change in the value of pi one need only look to the interaction of ct1 and ct4.  At a given speed (substitution of ct1 for the higher ct state, the amount of CT1 that has to change places increases depending on how much CT4 is present.  This is a tautology of sorts, defining the equation based on observed phenomena as opposed to prediction, but since AuT is predictive of everything from the series of big bangs, to the universe shrinking without an increase in mass (although x does increase), to the mass of black holes and what they are, in short, predicting essentially everything, allowing that the universe can function in a way consistent with the theory as well as the theory functioning in conjunction with the universe just makes sense.
The next question is whether pi increases steadily between states or all at once mathematically.  The exact equation for velocity is generally known as 1:256 (ct1 to ct2) is the speed of light.1:512 is ½ the speed of light, presumably.  Therefore, the more ct4 moving at a given speed the greater the amount of ct1 that has to be present meaning that “space” has to increase to supply the increased substitution/consumption in the equation.  This suggests that curvature of space is nothing more than the increase in the value of aligned ct(higher states) and the quantity of substitution (speed) both of which are derived from the stacked solution of prior F-series solutions offset by a constant value of pi for each separate state, presumably the value of pi going to zero for space or at least the non-linear equivalent of zero since space is not required to be curved in this solution.
That is, the definition of pi remains constant for any state, but the amount of curvature varies based on the amount of ct1 relative to ct2,3 or 4 and since ct2 does not vary relative to ct1 there is no variation.
There are two ways that ct1 interacts with higher ct states.  One is velocity in a line the other is vibrational but these two are only distinguished by solutions that take into account one ct1 repetitively solved relative to one ct(higher state) and we observe this as heat which is dissipated by having more ct1 come into the equation which forces the ct(higher states) apart as is observed which is one way that the algorithm solutions are reflected in the “shadow forces” of K-physics.
The only indication that space exists in multiple forms other than the observed size of it comes from the one non-relativistic force, gravity which is theorized to be the force of moving either towards or away from non-linearity.  There is another indication of gravity which is the movement towards or away from overlap.  The length of time indicates that this is a result of the preserved state along the carrier F-series formed by stacking which is an indicator that the state of gravity (and therefore all other states in the f-series) are preserved until there is a change in the carrier algorithm towards or away from overlap.  Gravity may, despite the positive and negative spirals exist without spiral interaction since it has two arms which in higher states form the two spirals (under the -1,0,1 model).
While this is an interesting view of pi, it isn’t necessarily the only way to look at pi.
Pi may vary at different levels just as the F-equation changes.  That is, it may increase in curvature steadily based on concentrations of information relative to the number of ct1 states being shared under the methodology set out herein which as taught herein is a function of the amount of information aligned with any set of ct1 states. 
Pi changing explains many phenomena.  We cannot accelerate to the speed of light, theoretically before the speed of light the organization of ct2 and therefore the geometry of space would change due the changing value of pi.
While using our physics, this means that matter could not exist and it would turn into energy, there are alternatives in AuT.  While the information state would change, there is no reason why the information state could not change back the same way opening up the possibility of moving information at light speed and possibly much faster.  Since we have the ratio of 1:256 as light speed and 1:512 as halve light speed, we should have 1:128 being double the speed of light and 1:64 being 4 times the speed of light and so on so that multiples of light speed as we observe it should be relatively trivial to create, at least on paper.  How to form the transformation without permanently changing to space or changing to space and reforming with the same structure is where the “warp speed” vs “warp destruction (information never actually being destroyed)” are differentiated.

The opportunities in manipulating the algorithm as opposed to things outside of the algorithm provides for things like speeds greater than light, barriers that are impenetrable, and more or less free energy.  Now it may be impossible for a pre-ordained to affect such items, but we do so indirectly now, so a more direct manipulation is not out of the question.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD5_-euWcho&list=RDMMsD5_-euWcho

No comments:

Post a Comment