AuT Lumpy time 10

With this post you get caught up to where I jumped ahead.  I am supposed to pick up my notes next week, a monumental week capable of dissolving largely over the weekend.   We're still several weeks (at this rate) away from series and time dilation, the post after the lumpy time series that defines the structure.  We'll discuss line slopes and tangents before that and not spend a little time Of shoes--and ships--and sealing-wax--Of cabbages--and kings--And why the sea is boiling hot--
And whether pigs have wings."

Putting these features together and looking for the most likely feature of aging relative to speed we have to remember that the “carrier” F-series intersecting spiral algorithms get very long indeed.  This can be “centuries” or “eons” in length.  Rather than look at one that is eons, lets look at stacked ct1 states that go 1,1,2,3,5,8 and we’ll focus on just the 8.  This is less than the blink of the fastest eye since it would take 1.07x10^39/8 of these to make a second but we can use this for purposes of figuring out the relationship of acceleration to aging.  First we need a second one and this one will be 3,5,8,13 not because the 13 is significant, but just to distinguish between the two.

Next we will take a matter quanta, but rather than pay attention to the 10^16 matter or even the 6^8 waves, we’re going to focus on the photons (256) that make up the matter and we’re going to look at this as 255+1.  As this 1 travels along the 8 units in the first ct1 the ct1 is aging 8 to one.  That is the ct1 only changes at the 90 degree turns in the spiral.  As long as the 1 of the 256 travels in conjunction with the 8 parts of the ct1 it ages 8 to 1.  If the ct1 was very long, say 3.3x10^15 it would age at the rate of 3.3x10^15 to 1 as long as it traveled along that one ct1 state carrier and only at the end of that very long number (3.3x10^15 + 1) would the ct1 change state (e.g. 0 to 1 or 1 to 1 or 1 to 0). 

Not let’s look at our forgotten friend, the ct1 at the 13 state.  If instead of moving along the ct1 all 5 places it was instead to “jump” to the 13, it would change its rate of aging relative the first ct1 from 1:8 to 1:13.  It would “stop” aging relative to the first and would instead only age relative to the second.  Further, the transition from one to the other would involve not aging along a ct1 carrier line, but instead a transition from one ct1 to another ct1 which would not age it at all relative to ct1.  This unusual process is the reason that Einstein mistakenly said we each have our own time, true time being the change in x that causes this relative to change to function, and also the events that constantly happen to change relativity.  It is possible that ct1 changes occur notwithstanding the other features (0,1,1,0) every quantum point but this would not change the aging process.  It is also possible that all transitions are driven by ct1 changes, that is all velocity (transition between two carriers) occurs when either the ct1 state transitions (0,1,1,0) or when the ct1 state “turns” (1,1,2,3,5…) the latter making more sense for the simple reason that the curvature changes in space that accompany the transitions (m1+m2/r) seem more related to curvature changes associated with these changes and keeps them localized.