The space-non space time interface is largely solved; but I've had to expand the lumpy time section to cover this.
I have 8 of these right now and the number increases as the lumpy time series is edited prior to publication.  This gives you an idea of what you'll get in spirals in amber second edition.
It was worthwhile to me because it gave me some room to stretch and put these theories into one place where they make sense without getting too high fluting (pronounced High-Faluting).

 AuT-Lumpy Time 2 the even exchange

Now some of you are wondering, ‘why an even exchange?’  There doesn’t have to be an even exchange or even any exchange at all.  But we do have “movement” based on relative comparison of ct1 to ct2.  That is where all of Einstein’s work comes from.  He had space-time down pat.  The real question is why didn’t he see where space time arose since if it were any more obvious it would jump out and bite everyone.  The answer, is that it only became obvious from a better understanding of information theory and the breakdown of information at certain boundaries.  It did, after all, take almost 3 years to burrow down to that once the boundary problems was mathematically obvious.

The even exchange comes about because movement is “quantum.”  We know that ct1 changes relative to ct2, otherwise there would be no movement.  We know that ct2 appears to travel based on being at one ct1 point one quantum instant and another ct1 point at another quantum instant and even Einstein figured out how long a quantum instant was although he largely ignored his finding in favor of ignoring the ct1-ct2 interface for whatever reason.

There are only so many ways to have this exchange. (1) One is for ct2 states (which we have to remember are only aligned ct1 states) to move along a line of ct1s.  This is not attractive because it is bulky.  This, however, the traditional method of observing movement.  The problem with this traditional method is that is requires linear space time and we know based on information theory that space time has to be quantum, otherwise there is no minimum size, even Planck would have some problems there. While we now know that Planck was wrong (minimum length is information not length at all) he did at least look as far back in space time as he could without leaving it entirely like AuT. (2)The other is for one of these ct2 states to change by substitution.  There are two forms of substitution, but they amount to the same thing, one is the exchange of one ct1 state for a ct1 within the ct2 ‘matrix’ and the other is for all of the ct1’s in the ct2 matrix to shift together from one quantum universe to the next stacked one.  Both occur together and the math is similar.  The passing through of a common ct1, exchanging with one of the ct1’s within the ct 1 matrix, over time, this means that the “compressed” ct2 state appears to be a lump even though it isn’t.  Instead the ct1 being exchanged “moves through all the “compressed” ct1s and this common movement makes them appear together.  This fits well in the 1 to 11 F model and explains why that model works.  From 1 to 11 you get the exponential exchange as discussed in detail herein comparing F series compression to information theory compression.  In other words, a compressed ct2 is merely a matrix of ct1’s that exchanges sequentially with a ct1.

This suggests that ct2 and ct1 may interchange like ct3 and ct4.  It may be that there is some mathematical reason this is unlikely; but expansion/compression inflection point theory of AuT suggests that this conversion actually happens on massive scales, otherwise there would not be big bangs and the opposite inflection points which we can call “big unbangs.”