Please make sure to cite spirals in amber in all your comments, I need to press. This comes from the yet unpublished 2nd edition.
AuT-Lumpy time 1
There are two separate
universes. One is the "true" universe which has a clock based
on the quantum changes in a single variable.
The second universe is
the relativistic universe that we call space time.
The division between
these two can be understood as follows:
The relative comparison
of unbroken ct states to a broken ct state is recorded by stacking each
solution to get the next solution. The theory runs as follows;
1) 1 compared to 1,1 or
2 for photonic state. 1 compared to 1,2,3 for wave energy, etc.
2) The same process
occurs and the two solutions are added to get a recorded event.
3) 0 compared with 1,1,
or 2 for photonic states which creates a defect in the operation. This
defect gives rise to time and provides a mechanism for separating points giving
rise to dimension and standard clock time.
4) X continues one quantum
change at a time so that time is changed into two separate parts: x time which
is true time; sct (which is relativistic space-time).
Also, if all times are
built on the prior times, then it may be possible to mine the present for the
past. It might require “rehabilitating” past data which has changed in
response to the changing value of x which is presumed to be the reason that
history fades so quickly, that past information “degrades” from the state it
was in when history was made to successive states one quantum instant of
information at a time until it is completely degraded.
There are certainly some
"elements" of time information preservation. For example, light carrying old times, often
billions of years old, into our telescopes.
This suggests that degradation is potentially slower (or even
non-existent) for lower ct states (2 and 3), yet another element of ct states
which suggests additional examination.
One suggestion is that the higher the ct state the faster the
degradation of time carried so very little occurs with photons and waves, but
it increases greatly with matter and ct5.
There is little question
that in Aut the present is built on the past, but the methodology requires that
standard clock time changes are relative to ct1 along with separation and
velocity which otherwise would not be perceived (but for changes relative to
ct1).
Time, as a relative
change against ct1 can be measured in quantum steps and hence must be quantum,
that is sct. If ct2 is 256 compressed ct1 states changing with one ct1
state (one ct1 exchanging position with one of the 256 compressed ct1 states
(or 1 ct2 state) at a time; then at ct3 for the “speed of light” there would be
“either” (1) 6^2^3 (6^6) ct2 states changing at a time or (2) that same number
of ct1 states changing at a time; either giving the same result of 1 in 256 for
ct1-2 for the speed of light.
Now some of you are
wondering, ‘why an even exchange?’ There
doesn’t have to be an even exchange or even any exchange at all. But we do have “movement” based on relative
comparison of ct1 to ct2. That is where
all of Einstein’s work comes from. He
had space-time down pat. The real
question is why didn’t he see where space time arose since if it were any more
obvious it would jump out and bite everyone.
The answer, is that it only became obvious from a better understanding
of information theory and the breakdown of information at certain boundaries. It did, after all, take almost 3 years to
burrow down to that once the boundary problems was mathematically obvious.
The even exchange comes
about because movement is “quantum.” We
know that ct1 changes relative to ct2, otherwise there would be no
movement. We know that ct2 appears to
travel based on being at one ct1 point one quantum instant and another ct1
point at another quantum instant and even Einstein figured out how long a
quantum instant was although he largely ignored his finding in favor of
ignoring the ct1-ct2 interface for whatever reason.
There are only so many
ways to have this exchange. (1) One is for ct2 states (which we have to remember
are only aligned ct1 states) to move along a line of ct1s. This is not attractive because it is bulky. This, however, the traditional method of
observing movement. The problem with this
traditional method is that is requires linear space time and we know based on
information theory that space time has to be quantum, otherwise there is no
minimum size, even Planck would have some problems there. While we now know
that Planck was wrong (minimum length is information not length at all) he did
at least look as far back in space time as he could without leaving it entirely
like AuT. (2)The other is for one of these ct2 states to change by
substitution. There are two forms of
substitution, but they amount to the same thing, one is the exchange of one ct1
state for a ct1 within the ct2 ‘matrix’ and the other is for all of the ct1’s
in the ct2 matrix to shift together from one quantum universe to the next
stacked one. Both occur together and the
math is similar. The passing through of
a common ct1, exchanging with one of the ct1’s within the ct 1 matrix, over
time, this means that the “compressed” ct2 state appears to be a lump even
though it isn’t. Instead the ct1 being
exchanged “moves through all the “compressed” ct1s and this common movement makes
them appear together. This fits well in
the 1 to 11 F model and explains why that model works. From 1 to 11 you get the exponential exchange
as discussed in detail herein comparing F series compression to information
theory compression. In other words, a
compressed ct2 is merely a matrix of ct1’s that exchanges sequentially with a
ct1.
This suggests that ct2
and ct1 may interchange like ct3 and ct4.
It may be that there is some mathematical reason this is unlikely; but
expansion/compression inflection point theory of AuT suggests that this conversion
actually happens on massive scales, otherwise there would not be big bangs and
the opposite inflection points which we can call “big unbangs.”
This requires a further
discussion.
No comments:
Post a Comment