Building an algorithm 14: ct1-speed and gravity and a non-steady state universe

I'm jumping around quite a bit this weekend.  It's not all clean sailing although I'm at page 91 of 151 of the edits.  I hope this morning to get started on the last 1/3 of the edits.  Part of the complexity is that I'm writing this in reverse, for example chapter 14 which follows is being edited before 13.  This is because the theory came together more at the end than at the beginning.

I'm not happy for the short time to be over, but work is building like a pressure cooker and I may have to publish the second edition unfinished to some extent because I may be torn away from this for some time.  I think everything critical has been done now although the final formulas, the e=mc^2 moment remains to be finished even though it appears in large parts scattered through this work.

I have a February grant deadline and a compacted version of this needs to be put together and Id like to have a hard copy to work from and there are the ditches I have to dig to eat in the interim.

Building an algorithm 14: ct1-speed and gravity and a non-steady state universe

Newton and Einstein math models predict that a static universe would not work.  In this way they are partially correct in the belief that the universe must be either expanding or contracting and not static.  The change in x means it must be moving, but at quantum instances it is not moving at all and dimension, the movement, that they work with doesn’t exist except as a relative change between non-dimensional elements.

AuT correctly points out that the universe is not static at all, that change is an absolute requirement in the solution to the single variable universe although any particular solution defies both Newton and Einstein by remaining quantum and therefor static.

AuT suggest that the "universe" is not expanding nor contracting but that it merely defines an average which reaches inflection  points according to an algorithm and that at the inflection points the effect being localized as either expanding or contracting and overall being net expansion or contraction.

However, at any point the universe is unbalanced because the change in information is based on converging series and diverging series which are defined by infinite series by definition.

It is suggested by the model that the amount of ct1 contacted over time by a "higher compression state (e.g. ct4)  increases speed.  That is between F(x) and F(x-n) if a ct4 has a common solution within a series of adjacent solutions with more ct1 states as opposed to the same ct1 states then it moves faster (compare if it contacts more -ct1 (the opposite spiral solution).  As a corollary if the shared ct1 states repeat between two different ct4 states then things are vibrational in nature.  If the number of ct1 states contacted shifts between a common set of ct4 states in vibration you get the same result which explains gravity giving rise to the same phenomena of time dilation, since it reflects a concentration of shared ct1 states with the same velocity.

The incomprehensibly long carriers of ct3 that give rise to ct4 have foreseeable but unusual effects:

1)     Matter exists in stable forms over very long periods of time.  With (and possibly without) stable substitution of ct1 states (matter not decomposing to energy because shared ct1 states keep it from dissipating), a given ct4 state may exceed the 40 billion year cycle of the current universe, i.e. even at one change per 1.07x10-37^th of second, some of these carriers may (individually or through substitution of common ct1 states between matter) be so long that there are 40billion years worth of seconds before the next “net” turn in the ct3 carriers forming the4;

2)     Matter forms large compressive cycles sharing large successive ct1 states so that it appears to move through space through a sharing of ct1 states

3)     Ct1 state substitution (sharing) is so immediate that (a) states are shared to give rise to vibration between the same ct4 states to give the appearance of solidity and (b) common movement through space. 

4)     This is in contrast to waves (and more so with photons) where sharing is in two and one dimension respectively giving rise to the appearance of movement in one direction at the maximum substitution rate of 1:256 for waves and all direction for photons except that both waves and photons, in the presences of ct4 experience such compressed sharing of ct1 states that the bending of apparent space exists changing the sharing rate to stop absorbed ct3 and 2 states in a manner where “absorption” equals a longer term sharing of common states to cause a common movement through space while not requiring a change in substitution rate; a phenomena that probably occurs (absorption) when matter, waves or light are in the presence of black holes

5)     All forms of clock time experience an end where they break into lower ct states and this is experienced with stars when they explode and other examples of state transformation on a smaller level.  Presumably unstable black holes would exist for the same reason unless a cycle of compression comes to exist where they continually recycle shared ct1 states to prevent a net localized change.

Each of these phenomena should be discussed separately to get a better understanding of the universe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKR-7iIpvmc

https://www.inverse.com/article/25714-gravitational-waves-ligo-einstein