AuT Lumpy time 8 AuT SMIT 4

I am forcing my way through this.  The more I see the reality the more difficult it is to describe it, the more pointless the more distractions.  I have to drive for 12 hours next week in an attempt to find something that I cannot explain to you, defying odds.  But I have found that nothing is impossible, because what we call reality is shadows, the possibility for something greater lies beyond it.  It is in your hands as well as mine, how can I reach out to you if you don't understand that.  What happens next is as much your choice as mine.

I will give this gift for you because it is because of you that I see this, and for what purpose?  If there is truly nothing we can do with this, then why is it so clear to me.  Why have the answers to the real world; if I am not mad, why allow me to see what is behind the curtain?  Why do I have to give up so much to see this if the reward for this is not you?  Is the universe so cruel that it only reveals its secrets to taunt you, to taunt me?

One thing that I have learned is all the stupidity and cruelty of man is merely to move from some past moment to a future moment when some math formula hidden far behind what we think is reality dictates that we are to arrive there.  But if the curtain is pulled aside for me, and I am compelled to tell you, what is the purpose if not to bring me closer to you somehow?

The non-linear aspect of space may be the flaw in ct1 which allows the universe to be recorded.

What you are reading are perhaps one of the most important posts to date although if you haven't read the others, if you are not familiar with the equation that drives the universe and F-series stacking of prior universes to get to the present universe it will be missing pieces; but since it is about a missing piece that is altogether appropriate, so I encourage you to read on.

This work in its entirety is an amalgam of Greek teachings, which I was given and the modern work of coincidentally Jewish and Christian physicists.  Since much of the Greek teachings were preserved by Muslims or moors it represents an amalgam of western cultures and perhaps it points out the binding nature of the spiral methodology.  I owe much to the Greek who pointed out some of the flaws in the earlier work directly and indirectly which allowed to refinement of the original, inaccurate work which was mistakenly tied to Einsteinian and Hawkinian physics which were defective.  Only by looking at the more fundamental work and examining the flaws reflected by modern work was it possible to see how unbalanced the universe was and how it relies so extensively on diverging/converging infinite series to progress.

In this way, not only do we solve for all the big mysteries of modern physics, either by eliminating them or by explaining them; but we also see our place in the universe.  While our place is not particularly glorious, e.g. we explode bombs as part of the compression/decompression cycle while thinking we are gloriously discovering things, the fact that the universe gives us the ability to solve for our place is fascinating and can only be explained by the ironies that gave rise to this seminal work, the first of its kind which defines these features.

You don't have to believe it, but I don't have to care.  

The exact mechanism of the linearity to nonlinearity of space is hard fully understand from a dimensional perspective since space is pre-dimensional, but the algorithm of Space resets at least every two changes of x.  

Let me explain.  One way of looking at space is 0,1,1.  But there is another way which would be -1,0,1.  The -1 is not necessarily a negative but when stacked to form ct2 it becomes the negative arm of the spiral solution defining whether the particular solution is a compressive one or a decompressive one or a steady state one.

This gives the same ration of 0,1,1 up to a point.  While it vibrates around zero there are two 1’s for the 0 which in the information embodiment would be yes, zero, no or positive, neutral, negative.  By strictly linear mathematics such a result is an aberration; but space is nonlinear, pre space-time so it doesn’t make a distinction between positive and negative in the same way that we do. 

The stacking of space allows for two things.  First it allows that positives and negatives are relative to zeros and, in turn, this matching of positives, negatives and zeros gives rise to dimensional characteristics like pi.

By resetting between states, space gives a bench mark against which other changes which do not reset can be measured (relativity) and against which the changes can be compared (distance and velocity).

Compression past the initial ct1 state can, in this event, be seen as "not resetting" over a period of time and the stacking of ct states along with the failure to reset to zero, provides a mechanism to prevent higher states from degrading.  There is no mechanism for them to reset. You have -1,0,1 and when stacked using the F-series it first goes to 1,1,2 and -1,-1,-2 which combines the f-series of initial spatial creation to the f-series of continuity.

The transition from a -1,0,1 net zero state to a set of -1 and 1 states stacked according to a secondary F-series is what allows for relativity and space time from a non-dimensional matrix of space.  The question of whether this means there is a single space for all higher ct states or multiple space states is not adequately answered by dimensional mathematics.  While we revolt at the idea of a single space working with all higher ct states, there is no time or dimension for that single ct1 state to worry with so it can be where and when it needs to be relative to the higher F-series solutions.

This model helps explain why higher ct states do not obviously degrade to space.  To allow degradation past photonic, they would go to zero.  The higher ct states don’t have a null state (0) because they are “built” from stacking either 1 or negative 1 or a solution embodying both 1 and negative 1 offset based on the value of pi which evolves presumably in both directions but always according to a converging series.

Stacked zero states may exist in the universe as F-series of zeros but how they would be perceived and how they interact with other states is uncertain but may represent what we “perceive” as separation and “space” as the black stuff in the sky at night and might be part of the offset between higher ct states.

The methodology for this could be changing places with a ct1 state which allows for velocity and separation to become possible or it could be that only the comparative changes against the three step heartbeat yes, yes, nothing, yes, yes, nothing of ct1 is important.

Just as apparent lengthening with speed, a relativistic concept, or the shrinking of slower moving objects, can be seen as reflecting with greater speed and increased substitution of reset states, it is possible that the fewer the less of the high ct state that is exposed to the effects of reset.

In any event relativity has to be in reference to some defect in ct1 and the obvious one is the zero point in the 0,1,1 cycle.

F-series addition of universes assures us that the features of the defect are preserved.  The fact that it is every third point in the cycle ensures that it is an odd and not an even function which might produce a universe too uniform to give rise to what we observe.  Indeed the two positives before the negative may be what give rise to the unique definition of pi:

x/1+(x/3)-x/5+x/7 skipping two beats in the denominator and starting off as two positive beats.

One can think of this as an old fashioned film where every third frame is blank.

One would expect the universe to flicker, but since there is a change every 1.07x10-39th of a second it cannot be easily observed with our primitive tools on the macro level and we need to look for the indirect consequences, such as how it is reflected in observed physics.

The hand of fate having written moves on, but it preserves each of the pulse changes and the defect in every third pulse of ct1 which is not present in the higher ct states allows for a quantum notch in the universe like the notches that run a player piano.  We are the song, intangible, not the piano or roll of music.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6cdPeYJh0s