Electron/Positron: Part IV-Thru 5/14/18

It takes a lot of time to do this, the science and the writing.
Its a full time job.
So the question becomes, do the job or do the writing.
I have several options in this regard, the r one, the o one and the more desperate, high risk options.  Any one of these could well absorb all of my time and basically kill my work writing and tracing the universe back to its fundamentals.

What do you do, continue the life of drudgery or pursue your dreams.
I find myself failing to mellow in my old age, continuing to be jealous of things which I know do not matter and some that do.

I am constantly coming up with ideas that interest me, certain a few westerns come to mind, I have half a dozen novels to finish at one stage or another in addition to the ones which I considered finished before but which I find myself picking up again, ah sam, will we ever be done?

I am, at least for now, two unexpected events and perhaps two or three years away from a catesstrophic failure.I can use those years wisely or foolishly, I can pursue my dreams and  continue to delve deeper and deeper into time and space or I can pull back into the safety of what has always protected me.

I know the answer to this quandry, just as you do, but do I, do either of us, have the courage to do what we need to do?

I sort of starting at the end and moving backwards,but this is issue is at the part where things are at their most complex.

The transitional states suffered by matter are pretty easy to look at in the abstract.

However this issue of charge, even in fairly simple systems is much more complicated.

 How systems combine to form dimension turns out to be pretty easy to envision

But the building from balanced units leading to unbalanced charges seem most likely to come  from trapped states and transitional features.

So I made a stab at this recording because othewise I figured I would dwell on this for too long and delay both the audio book and the list and compression videos.

https://soundcloud.com/greg-friedlander/listslidematterantimatter

Part IV-Thru 5/14/18

          AuT charge as a series of quantum states.  To see how charge occurs, we must look (1) at how the localized compression states (primarily positrons) pulls apart (net) from surrounding states and (2) see how the individual ct3,2 and 1 states making up the electron/positron compression state to see where compression changes occur and how underlying states of the ct1 states change or both.

          Charge appears largely to be a function of a relatively stable system reacting to gross surrounding changes in compression which prevent net compression or decompression locally while experiencing a localized net rate of ct1 charges or an absence of gross ct1 charge changes.

          It seems likely that an electron has a net moving towards compression of an underlying state on a higher state along with a net moving towards a particular charge in the fundamental ct1; and the positron is the opposite net effect.

          These two sets overlap only at the ct1 level.

I think the net moving towards a particular charge - going positive for protons and going negative for neutrons makes the most logical sense if a single feature is at work.

          The equally important question is why electrons break off where they do in compression when things are going negative and protons break where they do when going positive

          Why are the charges moving towards positive values at the ct1 level, the ct1 component parts for positrons?

          This suggests that the net values, assuming dissolving of opposite solutions, of going towards positive for protons and negative for neutrons are at a certain balance at the ct4 arm loading state, the transition being fairly regular and not destructive because on unbalanced information arms, perhaps the reason that T4-8 arms don't exist, one would be going positive and the other negative at equal rates which would interact, like having unbalanced wave lengths for t4-7 and t4-9 but balanced, opposites cancelling at t4-8. (T4 refers to the transitional states of ct4 information arms and the number following the dash refers to the number of information arms involved).

          The underlying math of these fundamental constructs and how the negative and positive charges balance as opposed to one being greater and the other lesser is quite worth of extended analysis.

          The positron-electron interaction can be see as dissolving because of the polarity identity and perhaps this same feature works with other states like the t4-6 and t410 although alignment is not suggested.  Indeed, if they do somehow dissolve at those levels it would explain a lot.