The AuT matter mystery and the mystery of charge in antimatter

The AuT matter mystery

          One of the great mysteries of AuT is where T4(1-6) and t4(10-15) exist.  The solution appears to be that they are dwarfed in size compared to the t41-6 states and that everything collapses into at least a proto neutron at t4 and higher.  There are other possible solutions but these appear to be the better ones odds on.

the mystery of charge in antimatter

The mystery of charge has a couple of elements and we'll have to look at an old drawing and remember that charge requires a change over time and since all forces result from information arm loading or unloading we have to think in terms of how this gives us charged matter and antimatter.  Friction gives us a good model, but not a perfect one, but it just so happens we've been using a model that works pretty well:

This drawing, as you recall shows the pulling apart of entangled information that gives rise to all the motion of the expanding universe in terms of entropy, remembering that anti-entropy effects can be found locally and that eventually everything will entangle again.
I've blown up the drawing so we can look a little closer at it.  if x and g unravel away from each other you get the charge qualities of matter.  But what if they pull over one another?  Essentially tangling and untangling at the same time.  That can create an aberrational result, an antimatter result at high levels of compression.  So you can have untangled decompression and compression yielding positive and negative values and entangled values giving the other result.  Its just a model, but an intriguing one.

          Net positive and negative features suggest that adjacent, dimension independent ct1 states cancel each other out, so that only the net values of ct1 control the charge of the universe at any point in time.  This raises idea of “dual universes” yielding the universe that we experience which is what we observe locally where antimatter is present.

          It is likely that a careful study of antimatter in light of AuT principles would yield a more precise equation, but at least the most likely scenario is that there is a “natural” charge for T4(7) and T4(9) [transitional ct4 state for the electron and proton respectively] based on how the electrons are loaded, perhaps even based on any number above 8 arms being positive and any below being negative and those of the 8 or 16 arms being neutral.  The exact reason for this is not immediately apparent but may be inherent in the loading and unloading process that yields negative or positive meaning a growing unentanglement associated with the fast moving electron may be negative while a growing compression or entanglement associated with a t49 and higher would be positive.

          The attractive idea that above 8 and below 8 states have different charges is attractive because it might provide that the t4(7) and t4(9) are just averages with actual mass being some average feature between those two extremes.If we look at the model there are two sides of each arm, the 2 if the 2f(x) portion of the compression equation.

          We can assume these arms are alternating positive and negative fpix states for ct1 loaded onto ct2.  The logical is that on one side of the arm was +/-/+ etc and the opposite arm would be -/+/- but states trapped within the folds and this can vary and whether this variance can give rise to the matter/antimatter difference, are only theoretical and not certain results. 

There are extensive discussions regarding this already set out in books 1-6 of Algorithm Universe theory. 

While there is no net charge visible in this model, Fig 26 it is understood that transitions constant between solutions and the net value of trapped states provides ample opportunity for net charge or neutrality, however there is no net charge inherent in the breakdown of Figure 27.

Figure 27

Folding can be seen in terms of charge in Figure 27.

THEORY:  The most important aspect is that if you pick a range of solutions anywhere within this matrix, you will have a net value as positive or negative and for that area of space, this is the charge state of the space.  Whether matter or antimatter is formed at that point in space is controlled by that net charge for the entire space around a given particle and if it is not properly balanced, the two states cancel each other out and compression loading cannot occur, and it remains as space.

CONCLUSION:  In conclusion the argument is that the positive and negative values form some net arrangement locally and overall that defines how much loading occurs based on a net negative value of fpix regionally and how much loading occurs based compression possible within that space is matter or anti-matter based on a net charge value of that same space.

This, when rewritten with a little clarity will be the next audio to go with the matter antimatter portion of "the list" video presentation, currently available in rough form on youtube.