The pull on the electron and push of the positron

Ah, 3 in the morning.  What would we do without the sleeplessness of being apart, where would the time otherwise be spent?
This is fairly important conceptually but is a first draft of sorts, so take it for what it shows and expect something more definitive (when it is not 3 in the morning) noting that it relies on drawings and concepts that are fairly old by AuT standards.

There is a different effect at play here,  however, based on AuT quantum perspective.  In a quantum state there is no real charge other than the tendency towards or away from compression between t4-7 and t4-9 but when examined, you pull apart these two loosely connected unbalanced results with the result of the charge are observed.
The act of looking at the long term or short term interaction between the two halves of the neutron/ct4 transition states yields the elimination (temporary or permanent) of unbalanced ct2-3 loading phenomena in the lighter state as negative and in the higher state as positive except in situations where there is an unstable amount of charge within the system when you can get the opposite charge and an antimatter result.
It may be supposed that if you are pulling the two in different directions and they are brought together, it is like pulling hard on a knot that can come apart, it comes apart.
The figures below were used to show conceptually how compressed states can be pulled by the expansion resulting from decompression and how this can pull all the embedded states with it to create these types of result.

Since charge is loading or unloading of ct2 onto ct3 information arms, the idea is that the surrounding system of the electron or proton can contribute loading or unloading of this type of information over different quantum states in the preferred net amount of negative for the electron towards one would suppose a higher speed movement because of the possibility of ct1 escape (through further decompression of ct2) and the proton exhibits a net loading towards a slower more compressed state which is observed.  
If you have the opposite (antimatter) effect you have a breaking down, faster moving proton or a compression, slowing down electron conceptually at least over a limited value of x keeping in mind that the “limited” value of x is of the nature of 10^39 changes per second and that the speed issue is tied to ct1 release of an entire system and not just the electron or positron which need not release any charge (and probably doesn’t in a super collider) but which only needs to have the tendency or the exchange, as it is dragged along an unraveling ct1 tangle, to give up ct2.
Its also worth considering that the scale of electron compression is great and what charge appears to be under this scenario is the effect of pulling ct1 and ct2 states through ct4 transitional state knots over values of x, that is you are looking at the interaction between a series of ct1 and ct2 states moving relative to a t4-7 which is relatively stable in the form of an electron.
The potentially less stable positron might result from the way the ct1 is pulled through it or it may be this altered mathematical tendency to take on ct2 states that are also being pulled or pushed by the net compression of the ct1 in the system.

Picture this: electron has the tendency to give up ct2 states and as a tangle of information is slowly pulled apart these entangled ct3 states have the ct2 states pulled by the ct1 leaving.  In the positron the tendency is to take on additional ct2 states and in the same pulling the positron pulls at the excess ct2 states on the ct1 leaving.

          It is likely that a careful study of antimatter in light of AuT principles would yield a more precise equation, but at least the most likely scenario is that there is a “natural” charge for T4(7) and T4(9) [transitional ct4 state for the electron and proton respectively] based on how the electrons are loaded, perhaps even based on any number above 8 arms being positive and any below being negative and those of the 8 or 16 arms being neutral.  The exact reason for this is not immediately apparent but may be inherent in the loading and unloading process that yields negative or positive meaning a growing un-entanglement associated with the fast moving electron may be negative while a growing compression or entanglement associated with a t49 and higher would be positive.