Change your air conditioner filters, the units are working hard this time of year and need whatever break they can get.
Pi is not something that exists, it is something that arises from a non-linear solution.
| -1 | conv vib | don't change | ||||||
| summed | to converg | f(pix) | pi for ac2 | |||||
| -1^x | x-1 | 2x(-1)^x-1 | f(pluspix) | % change | n/f(pluspix) | n+n/fx | n/(n+n/fx) | 4 |
| 1.00 | 1.00 | -4 | -3.00 | -1.333333333 | 2.666666667 | 1.5 | 2.666666667 | |
| -1.00 | 2.00 | 6 | 5.00 | -1.67 | 0.8 | 4.8 | 0.833333333 | 3.466666667 |
| 1.00 | 3.00 | -8 | -7.00 | -1.40 | -0.571428571 | 3.428571429 | 1.166666667 | 2.895238095 |
| -1.00 | 4.00 | 10 | 9.00 | -1.29 | 0.444444444 | 4.444444444 | 0.9 | 3.33968254 |
The importance of breaking
pi into its constituent parts is because we see the universe as only a positive
element, because it is solved as only a positive element. However, in building the universe to the point
of observation, pi begins with a unit which we’ve called 0’ which has both a positive
and a negative element potential. To understand
this we have to examine what is positive and what is negative.
Since we live in a mirror,
we know that what we see is backwards, so the first point we have to accept is that
the true basis of reality is a negative, which is defined as a state (0’) which
can be either positive or negative in terms of linearity. The exact math in this time/dimension independent
environment allows us to recognize that -1^x is merely the only way that we can
manipulate this environment but what it really says is that there is a regularity
to how 0’ expresses itself in the algorithm that underlines the universe. This demands that the algorithm we are coming up
with is not just a math equation, but has some alternate durable form in g-space.
The next few chapters
will discuss how this new vision of -1^x affects what we observe and how we get
to the geo function from this solution.
Hidden in the equations for AuT is the source of the inflection points.| conv vib | ||
| summed | to converg | |
| -1^x | n/f(pluspix) | n+n/fx |
| 1.00 | -1.333333333 | 2.666666667 |
| -1.00 | 0.8 | 4.8 |
| 1.00 | -0.571428571 | 3.428571429 |
| -1.00 | 0.444444444 | 4.444444444 |
The Sin Equation
If the spirals are
only offset by solution order at higher ct states (ct2,3,4,etc) then you have a
resting phase built into spiral solutions that are not built into vibrational
models, but this can be made up where ct1 spacing takes the place of the rest
phase of the spirals.
This relationship is related to how
sinx is calculated: (x=angle in radians)
Siny=y-(y^3)/3!+(y^5)/5!)-(y^7)/7!+… or
Sum (0,
max n) [(-1)^n/(2n+1)!]y^(2n+1)
So for this
equation when defining pi, it is essentially fixed, but not exactly fixed for
high values of x.
Converting radians
to degrees gives some interest results but neither provides a non-specific
result for quantum points.
In looking a this
equation it is important to note that radians requires a value for pi, but pi
is calculable for any value of x, at least in theory.
This equation for
sin shows that both of these results have effectively the same operative
features:
1) (-1)^n is present for both pi and for sin so
it can, in theory be removed easily
2) 2x(-1)^(x-1)
is partially mirrored mathematically by y^(2n+1). The between these two lies in the additional
variable y which to some extent is mirrored by the numerator variable of pi and
the two are related to some small extent which we will get to shortly.
3) (2n+1)!
Is mirrored by n+n/fx=n(1+1/fx) where f(x) is derived -1^x so that the
relationship is 1+n to 1+ 1/f(-1)^n.
The reason for pointing out these
relationships is not because of the identity of the equations. If you are looking for a solution to a pi
based (radians) angle you are going to get to a related solution. Instead the reason is because the key
equations are used in the algorithm to define curvature, to derive curvature
from non-dimensional space by applying a comparative algorithm to the solution.
This
comparative solution describes the addition of multiple places of necessity (going
from 1 to 11 to 111).
So
we have one more derivation to go. How
do you get multiple dimensions to change at once. This requires an examination of the f-series.
In
base 10 this looks like this:
1*10+1=11. 1*100+1*10+1=111 and so on to infinity or
1+1*10+1*10^2….
Using
n for 1 we get
N+n*10^n-1+n*10^2n…=n(1+10^n+10^2n…). The part in parenthesis mirrors, of necessity
the factorial part of pi or sin so, for example, it is the equivalent of
(2n+1)!
The
universe does not, however have base numbers so we have
n(1+y^n+y^2n….) Another way to write this is: n+[y^(n+1)!]
which is surprisingly similar to this portion of the sin function [(-1)^n/(2n+1)!]. Y, of
course, varies with F(x) which is also 2(f(x)) or 2 times the Fibonacci number. Y is merely a substitution for a non-base number which varies according to the solution order relative to other similar states. Since you need 256 ct1 states to make a ct2 state, the solution suggests that 11, the dimensional state of ct2 corresponds to a base value of y=f(n)=4 and n corresponds to 2^n for n=4.
We will explore these relationships to arrive at the interface between curvature and compression, the final piece of Algorithm Universe Theory.
This
result, a tautology for all intents and purposes, ties curvature more or less
directly to compression states and suggests that a growing curvature correlates in
a growing compression state which is observed.
book 3 ready
No comments:
Post a Comment