It discusses pre-existing information theory which was the basis for the early versions of AuT.
It is not, perhaps, a fair discussion of the underlying article, but from the standpoint of AuT it is accurate, much more so now that it's been edited for Book 3. Coming in July maybe, by August for sure.
Each of the obvious information states,
whether ct1-ct6 or beyond have their own pi so interactions must be averaged in
determining the effect of the geo function on any collection of points.
Conceptually, strong nuclear forces
suggest the pi for the nucleus of an atom, the one we have to deal with, is
based on 5, while the surrounding space, presumably where we apply it is based
on 4.
Logic (of AuT) governs the minimum
transition size is at maximum acceleration because slowing is equal to sharing
of ct1 so compression to a proton or neutron is the result of increased sharing
of ct1 state, which means increased aging and relative slowing to the surround
ct1 matrix.
Again, the primary problem here is not
that information physics is not on the right track. Other than not have
the specific model incorporated into AuT and other than not seeing the role of
information for what it is, it does recognize information as a part of the
universe.
The main problem is that other
informational theories are stuck in space time. Peter Hanggi has discussed
the universe as "a giant quantum information processor instead of a
physical thing." G-space indicates
that the quantum processor is an algorithm operating outside of what we
consider the universe and what we see as the universe is a reflection.
https://www.wired.com/2017/05/happens-mix-thermodynamics-quantum-world-revolution/
which was republished from Quanta Magazine, which is somehow related to the Simons Foundation.
The rough ideas of the prior art are
worth discussing in light of AuT:
1) "... that energy spreads to cold objects from hot
ones because of the way information spreads between particles."
This is accurate and inaccurate under
AuT. First thermodynamics are a result
and not a condition. Information
exchanges are mathematical results and space-time spreading cannot exist in the
absolute environment defining the features.
Even Energy is a feature of thermodynamics so looking at energy
“spreading” is missing the whole point behind an information based universe.
Nevertheless,
the statement is true because the results of the algorithm govern all things,
including heat transfer which, of necessity, happens along ct1 exchanges,
fundamentally and relative to relative solution order.
2) "According to quantum theory, the physical
properties of particles are probabilistic; instead of being representable as 1
or 0, they can have some probability of being 1 and some probability of being 0
at the same time."
This statement is Wrong. There
is no probability in AuT. There is supersymmetry. In supersymmetry, there is only a solution.
Probability is replaced with certainty.
just means the non-AuT information theorists see information as
something that is part of things, instead of things being the result of equation
generating the information. Moreover in
AuT there is not some massive amount of true information, there is only the
single variable which when applied to the algorithm generates the foreground
information that confuses other information theory.
3) "A central pillar of quantum theory is that the
information—the probabilistic 1s and 0s representing particles’ states—is never
lost."
Under F-series definitions, the
present state of the universe preserves all information about the past,
although its relevance becomes less important and the ability to follow it
backwards is complex because of the offsets inherent and because of how the
information is buried and outweighed.
Preservation of information in low ct
states, ct1 for example, seems to be complete since ct1 substitution does not
change the overall makeup. At higher ct
states, a rock shows preserved history, but the substitutions that occur are
more complex and can create a more confused history. We preserve information, as in books, which
is a very short term preservation of history that reflects what is going on in
the basic ct states. The suggestion is
that the higher the ct state, the less information is preserved in an easily
followed manner but the more precisely it can be followed over a short period
of time.
For any quantum state, only
fundamental space remains unaffected in this analysis and that is a very small
part of what is observed.
AuT suggests this is accomplished with
sequential quantum states.
4) "Over time, however, as particles interact and
become increasingly entangled, information about their individual states
spreads and becomes shuffled and shared among more and more particles."
Tue
and false. Ct state sharing is envisioned (see figures 3,4 and 5) but the
exact mechanism suggests that entanglement is based on the predecessor
solutions to the algorithm.
There is comparatively dense amount of
overlap at successively compressed states, possibly including and even related
to common origin states.
Moreover, this process works both
ways. During decompression, the current net state of the universe, the net
“entanglement” or (in AuT) the net “sharing of common ct1 state solutions from
prior quantum states” may decrease.
5) "the arrow of increasing quantum entanglement
underlies the expected rise in entropy"
This
is inconsistent with AuT and points out the major difference between AuT and
prior information theory. Prior
information theory assumes that thermodynamic principles apply to the universe
at the quantum level. AuT proves that they do not since that would destroy two
things; 1) supersymmetry and 2) true information theory. In this pre-AuT view, information theory
continues to be a driving feature and not a result.
There is no "rise in
entropy" in AuT because there is no entropy. Yes, a hot cup of
coffee gets cold, but that is a localized result of the algorithm solution over
different values of a single variable.
The universe is made up of solutions to an algorithm generating diverging
infinite series (the increase in x) and a converging infinite series (increased
compression). Within this model the net compression or decompression
cycle occurs so that at times things expand and at times they contract, but the
two controlling series provide a supersymmetry so that entropy is an illusion.
6) "the global entropy of the universe stays forever
zero..."
This is correct, there is no entropy,
so it is at zero. This quote correctly
points out the inconsistency in the idea of actual entropy at any quantum
level. This inherently recognizes an
algorithm generating diverging and converging series which is defined with
particularity in AuT.
7) "Now in information theory, we wouldn’t say
entropy is a property of a system, but a property of an observer who describes
a system."
This is intriguing, but it also looks
at the resulting system as having entropy which is an illusion generated from
by the underlying supersymmetry. Moreover
and perhaps more important, there is no independent observer in the universe
who is not a part of the overall supersymmetry.
There can be an observer outside of the algorithm and there are
approximations within the algorithm that allow observation of
supersymmetry. The individual attributes
of the solutions to the algorithm are solved for quantum values of a single
variable. Relativity of observation is important to the observer within
the algorithm but there is no underlying entropy.
The solution for any point may be
solved in theory and estimated in reality because the numbers are too large to
truly solve it except at the beginning values of x. Time is irrelevant at these early values of
n. The states have nothing to do with
any observer within or without the system.
8) "information, energy and other “conserved
quantities,” which can change hands but never be destroyed,"
Conservation is not accurate because
the amount of resulting information changes with every change in the value of
x. Again, this is ego-centric reasoning
and fails to acknowledge that the universe is a result and not a thing. Information changes. It increases in
quantity. Energy is also an effect of the algorithm and a red herring for
anyone wanting to understand the underlying symmetry. This is the concept by Einstein that without
time, everything happens at once. The
problem is that AuT ultimately had to reject this concept since time was a
result, not an underlying part of symmetry.
9) "a hypothetical quantum system that uses
information as a sort of currency for trading between the other, more material
resources."
This is largely a correct statement,
except that it assumes there are “material resources” other than information
which renders it as inaccurate as any other statement within the article.
10)
"...the quantum information
describing the particles’ energy and spin states can act as a kind of currency
that enables trading between the reservoir’s energy and angular momentum
supplies."
Again, this suffers from the same
problem, it assumes that there are “reservoirs” of something other than results
from algorithmic solutions. There are no
such reservoirs in the universe.
The idea is tantalizingly close, but
energy and state (call it spin if you must, ct state is more accurate) are not really
things. They are just manifestations of solutions to the equation.
And finally…
11)
"...many theorists have come
to believe that space-time, the bendy fabric of the universe, and the matter
and energy within it might be a hologram that arises from a network of entangled quantum information.
The earliest
manifestations of AuT were based on this hologram idea. This statement is largely accurate among all
the other statements. Space-time is, in
fact, something that arises from an algorithm that generates information. There
is only one step missing which is that the quantum information states are
generated from a single variable algorithm.
No comments:
Post a Comment