AuT-compression through solution position

Book 3 is "in the can" as they say, on to book 4.
  The number of walls with the overlap allows for a method of building this out.  Positive on one side and negative on the other.
Let's look at this more closely at transient states within a process.

Getting more specific

Change occurs in a dimension free environment, but it manifests itself as dimension much as information is stored in one way and projected in another.  This is much like Hologram theory it occurs in a dimensionless environment, but occurs based on the order of movement.

            Let’s look at Compression a new way:

In book 3 we looked at the F-series linearity building from this vantage point.

Figure 1

This shows a non-linear type of information generating a positive and negative state or perhaps both and providing separation based on solution order (a, b, c, etc) so that a is at one point of separation from zero and d is 4 places removed, but d is only one place removed from at least one of the c places.  In this way even though each “circle” changes with x, the order of the change provides the potential for defining a separation of points in space once a higher information state is involved.

Figure 3 shows something different, the ct1 to ct5 exchange.

Let’s say we want to move a quantum black hole by one quantum length.  This is the process that would take place.

The first thing is that you have ct1 in place.  Conceptually based on Figure 1, you have lots of ct1 in a linear format, one ct1 state generated from the prior ct state.  This is largely considered a historical matrix based on solution order, rather than anything solid. There is no solid framework involved.  The generation of additional information is merely the stacking of solutions, but the preservation of history suggests that the linear versions of ct1 maintain the historical locations and position may be determined from there or compression may arise from there, but the preservation of history remains.

Compression theory suggests that every ct1 is comprised of (0,1,1)^2^1 which is 2^2=4 ct0 states (0,0,1)^2^0=1^1.  There can also be a negative one value of this, but that negative value is of uncertain value since -2^2=4 just as 2^2=4 according to our math.  What value our math has in this world of preserved history is uncertain.

The generation of pi suggests that there must be positive and negative states in some fashion, that information must have two different states generated from the original non-state of matter.

Figure 2

As was discussed in book 3, the drawing above shows the positive and negative aspects of information added together in order to achieve perceived curvature and this in turn comes from the f(pix) equations that can be used to generate the two converging solutions found in the examination of dimension.  (note that the inner circle is actually a consequence of the building of positive and negative states).

That being said, in some way, ct1 exists in conjunction with the higher states.  The suggestion of movement is shown in the drawing below.

A single ct1 linear state is shown.  In this version of the operation, the higher states are generated by stacking within the higher state. I.E. the transition states are shown as part of the building of the state.  So you start here with ct1 space composed of 4 ct0 states tied together.  This begins the transitional process innocently enough

 But the solution involves a prearranged solution, an inevitable solution that winds this ct1 state with 15 others to make 16. This effectively means you have a transitional state, a first transitional photon state where 4 groups of 4 get together.  Next you see 4 of those first transitional states get together to form a second transitional state and finally 4 of those second get together to form a fully compressed state of ct 2.

            This process, occurs with each subsequent state to form different matter states.  This building process is the basis for the 5 different structures shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3

            Something else is happening, movement and exchange.  The free ct1 state shown can go to two places.  The most receptive one is at the beginning of the ct2 photon state where building the ct2 began. It could, however, also substitute from one of the built sets of 4 (transition 1), sets of 16 (transition 2),  64 (transition 3) or even the set of 256. The two extremes are shown as a1 and a2 and the conceptual framework of lightspeed says that for ct2 you have one substitution for each quantum change in x which suggests the substitution occurs before the first transition state for one of the 4 transitions in the next state.  The alternative would allow for ct1 exchange to occur at a rate faster than 1:256.  In this case, it could occur 1:4, 1:16, 1:64, or 1:256.  Light doesn’t change at different speeds, so the conclusion is that it occurs at the first location if this manner of building information controls and this suggests that you transition ct1 states and rebuild ct2 from scratch at each change in the value of x.

            Now let’s take this up the chain.

            In this model, you have to change an entire photon’s worth of ct1 (256 ct1’s to make a single ct2 photon) to have a single movement of a wave.  This suggests that wave change would occur at a rate 1ct2:1.68x10^6 which would be considerably slower than the exchange rate observed.

            What we are looking at in terms of “place change” is: ct1: 1, ct2: 2, ct3: 3.  In book 1 it is suggested that the two dimensional and one dimensional aspects of ct2 and two dimensional aspects of ct3 allow substitution to occur to all ct3 at the same rate as substitution of ct2 but that when we inject 3 dimensional ct4 aspects we can and necessarily do slow down the wave exchange and rate of movement.  While observed, the mathematical supersymmetry of this result is troubling and is one of the primary issues addressed in Book 4.

            It will be seen that another feature suggested, is that while we observe ct3 as moving at the same speed as ct2, it is actually moving in other directions at the same time, generating waves, that render its movement effectively slower as some of it moves at the speed of light while other parts of it move slower and that we see this as a cloud of ct3 made up of particles of ct2.

            The same process appears to occur in the movement of ct4 and ct5 as shown which suggests that ct1 does not directly transition, but instead forms transitional states for transitions of movement and for this reason ct4 and ct5 are exponentially slower than ct3. The suggestion is that no matter how much energy you apply to ct4, the actual transition point would be less than the speed of light, i.e. if you accelerate matter to 11 ct3 changes per 1x10^16 ct3 states matter would  break down into a transitional state.
     This analysis will lead  to investigations into maximum and minimum changes, internal exchange rates, curvature, and many other facinating features of AuT, but I highly recommend that you  buy all three books to follow along, not for their particular insight although they are quite inciteful, but so that I won't starve to death halfway through the nex.....